“After four years of litigation across every level of the federal court system, it is time for this case to end,” lead Carroll attorney Roberta Kaplan argued in court filings. “And under the Court’s Stipulation and Order, Carroll is now entitled to obtain payment of the money due under the judgment.”

Roberta Kaplan cited a June 2023 agreement between her and Trump’s lawyers that he would put funds in a court-controlled account while his appeals unfolded. She said in court papers that this agreement spelled out that money would be released upon certain definitive legal developments––such as the US Supreme Court refusing to hear his appeal.

In Trump’s push against an order that would release of these funds, the president’s legal team cited his 6 July petition for the supreme court to reconsider their denial.

An order releasing the money before then, his lawyers argued, “would cause President Trump irreparable harm while not improperly disadvantaging [Carroll’] in any way.”

Trump’s team claimed that Carroll’s lawyers made an “incorrect reading” of the agreement and that it “does not permit collection while the rehearing petition remains unresolved.” If the judge didn’t order releasing the funds, Trump’ said, Carroll “faces only temporary delay, fully compensable by interest, unless judgment is overturned on appeal.

“That has been the status quo throughout the appellate process in this case, and it must remain so pending resolution of the petition for rehearing,” they argued. “President Trump, however, faces unrecoverable loss: Plaintiff has repeatedly stated that she intends to give away all funds that she collects from him, and once those funds are distributed to third parties, they likely cannot be recovered.”

Trump asked Kaplan to deny Carroll’s request for an order releasing the funds or, if he doesn’t deny it, delay making a decision.

>Your honor you can't release the money my client owes to his victim because... uh... the Supreme Court might change their mind!
Imagine having to debase yourself like this for a man who isn't even going to pay you

>>1523188
>rapist
we're doing this again, so soon after you got BTFO in the last thread? Okay, let's get it over with:

What evidence is there that Trump raped E. Jean Carroll?

btw if your answer is just
>other people said they think he's a rapist, which is enough """evidence""" for me because I'm an NPC and am therefore incapable of independent thought
then I will take that as a concession.

>why should Trump be labeled a rapist just because he raped someone?
esl shill is lubed up and ready for another humiliation beatdown

>>1523195
>SHIT, I got proven objectively wrong YET AGAIN!
>I know, I'll just resort to obnoxious shitposting again
You realize when you do that all you're actually doing is admitting that you know you're wrong, right?
And the whole
>I won't actually reply to them... maybe then they won't notice and I can save myself the embarassment
doesn't work either.

>esl shill shadowboxes a strawman and still loses
embarrassing

>>1523194

https://archive.is/20260508045553/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

>Kaplan roundly rejected Trump’s motion Tuesday, calling that argument “entirely unpersuasive.”
>“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
>He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
>Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”
>The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department, which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”
>Kaplan also flatly rejected the Trump team’s suggestion that the conduct Trump was found liable for might have been as limited as groping of the breasts.
>The reason? Trump was not accused of that, so the only alleged offense that would have qualified as “sexual abuse” was forced digital penetration. Beyond that, Trump was accused of putting his mouth on Carroll’s mouth and pulling down her tights, which Kaplan noted were not treated as alleged sexual abuse at trial.
>“The jury’s finding of sexual abuse therefore necessarily implies that it found that Mr. Trump forcibly penetrated her vagina,” Kaplan wrote, calling it the “only remaining conclusion.”

>>1523188
Pretty sure the money is just going to have to be seized from him.
In fact any money he has right now should be seized because it's been made in violation of the emolument's clause

>>1523199
They already made Trump give up the money, it's just been sitting in a court supervised account pending appeal. Now that SCOTUS has declined to take up the case and allowed the ruling of the lower court to stand, the money goes from the account to Carroll.
Trump and his team were trying to play legal games to avoid the money being transferred, but no judge other than maybe Aileen Cannon is going to humor him on this.
The real fun starts when SCOTUS tells Trump to fuck off over his appeal of his second defamation ruling and he has to fork over 83 million dollars to her because he couldn't keep his fat mouth shut even after the trial was over so she sued him again.

>>1523199
>socialist handrubbing intensifies

>migger seething intensifies
Anti-Trumpist schadenfreude intensifies.

>>1523198
Shigger sigger wigger y'all.

I jest tuk a brake from "raping" my little sister (wat, u gonna tell me finger-fucking her against her will is rape too?! Fucking liberals!!) too tipe dat: so wat?

So wat trump raped some lady? He no rape her cordin to de strictest standards of the defimit-in under da law, so just like my sister, who da fuck cares he raped her by any sane and reasonable person's defimit-in?

Getting my ass kicked in every thread on the sub didn't put me off the wrinkled pedo diaper dick, I just pivot and declare myself the victor. I'm such a massive faggot I'm going to pre-emptively declare my win even here. Hearing him talk about how he likes to assault women didn't put me off of him. You think him unambiguously raping a woman in a court of law is going to put me off of him? Yeah, and my sister's a fucking virgin too you stupid inbred miggeral figgeral quiggeral.

>esl shill having a melty over not knowing what words mean

>>1523211
yore esl

>>1523188
>Within an hour, Trump filed paperwork indicating that he is appealing this decision.
To who, idiot? The Supreme Court already told you to fuck off.

>>1523221
He thinks if he whines hard enough they'll change their minds
Or possibly he's going to start threatening them and their families, given that now he's also whining that he wants them to rehear the 14th amendment case as well.

>>1523222
some poor intern is getting 'fired' and having to change their nametag every time Trump asks why they haven't forced the supreme court to make him not a rapist

>>1523194
this is /thread, this is always the question that ends these threads because the leftist NPCs can't answer it. Stop replying to this thread, the NPCs failing to answer this question already proved that they know they're wrong.
>>1523198
so the evidence is literally just:
>other people said they think he's a rapist, which is enough """evidence""" for me because I'm an NPC and am therefore incapable of independent thought
we accept your concession

FFS we've had this exact thread like 100 times now and it always ends the exact same way: We ask if there's evidence, NPCs say "there's no evidence but other people said they think it's true," we point out that this is not evidence, NPCs make it clear that they don't understand because they can't understand the idea of basing a decision on anything other than what they were told to believe, and then we have shitposting like this >>1523195 >>1523197 where they make it crystal clear that they know they lost.

so /thread, no need to post in this or any future Jean Carroll threads, the leftist NPCs have lost this debate 100 times now.

>>1523225
god you're esl

>>1523227
esl shill comes from some backwards culture that has 30 words for rape because they rape so much, and gets confused by their translation software mixing up definitions

It amazes me how proud of this trash liggerals are.
1. Decades old incident
2 Carrol waited until Trump ran for president.
3. Has a history of making sexual abuse claims
4. NYC changed the laws to hear the case
5. The judge was obviously biased
This is why no on likes piggeral scum scammers.

>esl shill continues melting down over Trump being a rapist

>>1523225
>>1523229
And SCOTUS didn't bother hearing the case and allowed the lower court rulings to stand
None of the pro Trump justices even bothered writing dissents saying the case should have been heard, even though they wrote dissents for other cases SCOTUS announced the same day they wouldn't be hearing
Seems like if this were such an obvious witch hunt at the very least Thomas or Alito would have said something
But they didn't

>>1523225
>>1523229
unlike India where rapists get away with raping 5-year-olds, raping 52 yr old E. Jean Carroll is a serious crime in America.

although considering my son Donny's proclivity for raping young teens, if I was on the jury, I will probably would have voted innocent.

but then maybe, any port in a storm.

my favorite part was when trump tried to claim he didn't find Carroll attractive, then identified her as an ex wife when shown a photograph.

my least favorite part is when the rapist donald j trump raped E. Jean Carroll

>>1523232
No idea on that one, but I don't believe the supreme court had the power to over rule the state in this case.
Despite it being obviously banana republic shit, it was in line with the modified laws of the state.
However, I'm no legal scholar and I don't even know on what grounds Trump was challenging it.
It was obviously a scummy case though.

>>1523237
>However, I'm no legal scholar and I don't even know on what grounds Trump was challenging it.
Yeah, because you're a retarded partisan shill

everyone else understands that Trump is a rapist

>>1523227
>>1523228
>LOL I'm shitposting, I'm such an epic troll XD XD XD
you know this doesn't actually make us forget that you're objectively wrong. It just let's us know that you're objectively wrong AND a Zoomer
>>1523232
>I am 20 years old and not American so I have no idea what the Supreme Court is or how it works
we know, you already said that last week in the other thread. You don't have to keep telling us.
>>1523236
My favorite part is when we keep asking you if there's evidence and you all have a meltdown and do nothing but shitpost and admit to being NPCs. Then we have a new thread a couple weeks later where it happens again. Over and over and over again.

My second favorite part is when anons like the one above admit that they don't even know what SCOTUS is, then act like we should care about their opinion.

You are so fucking mad, holy shit.

>>1523245
>I got so completely and utterly BTFO in this argument that not only do I have to resort to pure shitposting, but I can't even reply to anybody because of how embarrassing it would be
You are so fucking young and stupid, holy shit.
>>1523238
>everyone else understands that Trump is a rapist
We have had 100 of these threads and literally NOBODY except NPCs is saying that Trump is a rapist. Go ahead, point to a single person ITT who is an actual human being capable of forming an actual thought who believes Trump is a rapist.
Pro tip: You can't, which is why all of you just shitpost instead of answering the very simple question that has been asked 100 times before: >>1523194
>What evidence is there that Trump raped E. Jean Carroll?
You didn't answer it in previous threads. You can't answer it in this thread. You won't answer it in future threads. Instead it will just be
>You are obviously fluent in English but I have nothing to respond with so I will call you an ESL because I'm a child and think this is a clever and witty response
that's it. That's all of the evidence you have.

esl shill is setting a new record for billionaire dicksucking

>>1523247
i think being called an esl shill by everyone is starting to get to them

>>1523201
>Bankster sweating intensifies

>>1523246
Not even whatever anon you're thinking of, don't post in these threads at all, just holy shit, you're so fucking mad.
Pro tip, buddy. No point you make means a thing when you're seething this hard.

>>1523238
>Trump is a rapist
I don't think fingering an old lady's butthole constitutes rape, but sexual assault. And sometimes "sexual assault" is a misunderstanding. Men have to be aggressive to get women, sometimes women are butthurt about it.
I also think that Carrol spent decades proudly bragging about Trump sticking his pinky in her faghole as she watched him on TV.
She probably bragged about Trump digitizing her sphincter until her friends couldn't stand it.
Or it didn't even happen and she made the claim in a Blasey-esque gambit to lie to "save the country" for "the greater good".
This is why Dems are a cult. This is why no one likes you.

>>1523262
>Trump isn't a rapist. He just unambiguously raped this woman, c'mon guys.
>I think it makes sense to argue sexual assault vs rape in colloquial speech, because I learned English in a classroom.
>I wish Trump would rape my faghole, so I guess he didn't do anything wrong.
>I'm not in a cult, you are, I'm just sitting here denying basic facts proven to the highest courts in the land.

Kill yourself.