View Announcement
Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!
Anonymous Japan Spits on Constitution, P(...) 07/31/26(Fri)12:47:08 No. 1526703 https://www.businessinsider.com/japanese-destroyer-fires-tomahawk-missile-for-first-time-2026-7>A Japanese destroyer has launched a Tomahawk cruise missile for the first time, marking a major milestone in Tokyo's push to build out its long-range strike capability. >Tomahawk missiles give Japan a new ability to strike targets beyond the reach of some other weapons in its arsenal, equipping it with a proven combat capability that could prove valuable to its naval forces in a potential conflict. >The Japanese Ministry of Defense announced the successful test-fire of a Tomahawk Land-Attack Cruise Missile from the JS Chokai, a Kongo-class destroyer, earlier this week. >"This live-fire test demonstrates steady progress in the Tomahawk project, and the Ministry of Defense will continue to work towards the early establishment of stand-off defense capabilities," the ministry said in a press release. The test-fire occurred in the Pacific Ocean with support from the US Navy. >Chokai is Japan's first destroyer equipped to launch Tomahawk cruise missiles. The ship sailed to the US last fall to receive modifications for the weapon and training for its crew. >Prior to departing, Chokai's crew conducted a mock loading drill with US Navy personnel using dummy Tomahawks. Now, the ship has fired the real thing. >Japan has begun receiving initial deliveries of the Tomahawk missiles it ordered. The total sale of 400 Tomahawks — 200 Block IVs and 200 Block Vs — is expected to be completed next year. Despite reports that diminished US stockpiles following heavy Tomahawk use in the Iran war could impact deliveries, Japan's defense minister said in May that the ministry did not expect delays or changes to the delivery schedule. >Future Aegis-equipped Japanese destroyers will also be armed with Tomahawk missiles, building off of Tokyo's larger national defense strategy that emphasizes buying more standoff weapons for striking enemy forces at greater distances. >>
Anonymous 07/31/26(Fri)12:59:19 No. 1526707 >>1526703 Oh rearry?>>
Anonymous 07/31/26(Fri)13:19:47 No. 1526713 >>1526703 Shamefur dispray>>
Anonymous 07/31/26(Fri)18:31:01 No. 1526788 >>1526703 They've been trying to work around that limitation for decades, so we'll have to see if it sticks this time.>>
Anonymous 07/31/26(Fri)19:32:17 No. 1526800 >>1526703 >Japan Spits on Constitution, So are the Japanese ever allowed to build up their military, or do we hold WW2 over their heads forever like the Jews do with Germany?>>
Anonymous 08/01/26(Sat)01:24:35 No. 1526885 >>1526800 guilt is a scam, and in germany's case a whole industry. but both world wars should be a lesson in consequences. keeping only defensive equipment keeps japan safer than building up attack capabilities, especially if they have to rely on deceitful warmongers like burgistan>>
Anonymous 08/01/26(Sat)07:41:51 No. 1526913 I don't see what the big deal is. How is this spitting on the Constitution when they could be buying weapons simply for defense? You know the Chinese will be firing at the mainland from very far away. Testing these missiles will be able to strike the assailants. Spit on Constitution what are you talking about? >>
Anonymous 08/01/26(Sat)09:07:54 No. 1526926 >>1526913 Article 9:>land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained They have already twisted the interpretation to allow a standing military as long as it is purely for self-defence, then broadened that to defending allies as well. That excuse worked, because they are careful to only have interceptors, scanners, anti-mining equipment, etc, nothing that could be used to attack, therefore no "war potential", supposedly. The new missiles are pure aggression, a Tomahawk (Land ATTACK Missile) doesn't intercept or defend, it is an unambiguous violation of their constitution, and another step toward world war. Also a waste of money that makes them even more dependent on deranged burgers, but that's their problem.>>
Anonymous 08/01/26(Sat)15:22:09 No. 1526995 >>1526703 America helped write that Constitution. It was meant to keep Japan from re-arming and trying to attack America, not to keep them from genociding the Chinks. They're not people, its entirely okay.>>
Anonymous 08/01/26(Sat)16:15:28 No. 1526999 >>1526926 What about North Koreas Nuclear program? I don't think Japan wants to get targeted by Nuclear Weapons, so wouldn't it be justified for them to buy weapons which can blow up the North Korean nuclear program in self defense?>>
Anonymous 08/01/26(Sat)16:29:23 No. 1527007 >>1526999 justified or not, their constitution currently says >war potential will never be maintained and strategically, if you don't want to be targeted by nukes, don't make yourself a target by pointing missiles at your neighbours (or stationing US troops which threaten to invade your neighbours)>>
Anonymous 08/01/26(Sat)16:52:12 No. 1527014 >>1526995 true enough. pretty funny to watch them immediately backtrack and lobby Japan to reinterpret/abolish A9 ever since tho>>
Anonymous 08/02/26(Sun)16:13:00 No. 1527209 >>1527007 >be totally unarmed, that will prevent anyone from bullying you China's territorial expansion into the south Pacific has preyed on weak nation's unwillingness to fight back.
Delete Post: [ File Only] Style: Yotsuba Yotsuba B Futaba Burichan Tomorrow Photon
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.