a
The crowd quickly rushed Lang’s vehicles as Lang, standing in the back of a pickup truck, hoisted a sign with the N-word. People threw liquids onto one of the vehicles as Minneapolis police tried to keep Lang’s crowd and the rush of counter-protesters separated, often resulting in shoving matches.

Chemical irritants wafted across several blocks of downtown Minneapolis Saturday as Vikings fans arriving for a noon home game tried to navigate the chaotic scene. Peterson later said he believed the irritants were used by both Lang’s side and the counter protesters, but not police.

The slow procession continued for the entire block as individuals squared off in occasional fisticuffs and skirmishes of lobbed water bottles or other objects before Lang’s two vehicles sped off.

Peterson said three officers were injured, ranging from an ankle rolled over by one of Lang’s vehicles to an officer being hit in the head with a “hard object.” One was hospitalized and released.

The two vehicles with Lang and six occupants split up, Peterson said. The Minnesota State Patrol stopped one in Minneapolis and Bloomington Police stopped the other in Bloomington, and Minneapolis police officers arrested both groups and impounded the vehicles. The names of others arrested weren’t available early Saturday evening.

Damn. It's my understanding that driving a car towards someone is attempted murder. Shame we're having to waste court time on this.

>>1531603
Didn't he also do this while having a bunch of retards dressed up as ICE agents accompany him? They weren't real ones. Isn't that also impersonating federal officers?

>>1531604
>Peterson said three officers were injured, ranging from an ankle rolled over by one of Lang’s vehicles
And this officer didn't immediately go AIIIIEEE and shoot the driver to death? Wow, crazy.

>>1531622
Genuinely why do authorities keep treating this motherfucker with kids gloves? Repubs will go on and on about activists judges letting criminals out on the streets but nothing about cops letting this guy go with a warning dozens of times across multiple states even though he's made it very clear he's going to keep agitating, threatening, and assaulting people until he gets someone killed. He's literally out on bond in like 4 states and he's still pulling this shit.

>>1531603
Man, I sure hope this anon bought the grifter's book.

I don't care what your politics are; this story is objectively hilarious.

He failed to mention the ass beating Long took at the hands of Spider Man

>Minneapolis
Gonna reserve judgement on this one.
>He arrived here Saturday to advocate for a Rochester woman who called a Black autistic child a racial slur, according to a profane-ridden post on his twitter account.
Fun fact: the child was such a problem to society that he had an ankle monitor.

>>1531641
>Fun fact: the child was such a problem to society that he had an ankle monitor.
Yeah that doesn't let you call autistic children slurs.

Reminder this retard hit 3 cops with his car and is also out on bond in both Texas and Minneapolis itself.

>>1531643
>Yeah that doesn't let you call autistic children slurs.
The first amendment does.
Also, the guy recording the entire thing was a convicted sexual predator at a children's park. He fled the country shortly after the entire spat for obvious reasons.

>>1531644
i'm not surprised that you'd defend this faggot with a clear humiliation fetish, given your situation

>>1531645
I'm talking about Shiloh specifically. No idea what's going to happen to the other guy.
The notion that our own most foundational legal principles should be amended because 'muh racism' is borderline treasonous.

>>1531646
ok racist lol

>>1531647
>racist!
Who cares?
Epstein? Hello? What was that? Shut up idiot.

>>1531622
Turns out the police are allies with the far right wing, who'd have thought.

>>1531644
>The first amendment does.
Yeah that doesn't give you a right to harass children in public.

>>1531648
who indoctrinated you to think most people are ok with blatant racism?

>>1531622
Well you see, the driver wasn't a liberal lesbian or a Mexican with his kid in the car, so they couldn't shoot to kill.

>>1531603
>its fine when democrats do it though

>>1531653
He asked her to say the slur anon.

>>1531654
The Epstein Files.

>>1531671
Funny how we were told dems driving a car near law enforcement was grounds for them to be shot yet this retard got arrested peacefully even after actually hitting three of them.

>>1531676
Are you outraged?

>>1531677
Do you ever get to go outside

>>1531676
and how many dems survived police encounters when they should've been put down.

>>1531679
So you're saying they should've just killed him?

>>1531680
If you agree renne and alex prati were justified then sure

>>1531703
They weren't.

>>1531714
why not? you're complaining about some guy being violent with a car when they're a righty but its fine if it's a democrat huh

>>1531715
why can't you get a real job

>>1531715
No, we're not.

>>1531644
I just learned about this incident from you (I live under a rock). So they charged this woman with disorderly conduct for saying the naughty word. But the guy filming lured a 16 year old girl into his trailer and raped her along with another guy, and the charges were dropped. Wtf?

Are we going to learn about rape gangs roaming around America soon? Like the British rape gangs?

>>1531734
>So they charged this woman with disorderly conduct for saying the naughty word.
She was found guilty of disorderly conduct for yelling slurs at an autistic child on a playground.

>But the guy filming lured a 16 year old girl into his trailer and raped her along with another guy, and the charges were dropped.
1. Source?
2. Not relevant to what the woman herself did.

>>1531761
>She was found guilty of disorderly conduct for yelling slurs at an autistic child on a playground.
No, it was disorderly conduct towards the child rapist.

>Do you have a source on that?
>Source?
>A source. I need a source.
>Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
>No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
>You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
>Do you have a degree in that field?
>A college degree? In that field?
>Then your arguments are invalid.
>No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
>Correlation does not equal causation.
>CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
>You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
>Nope, still haven't.
>I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

The shithole known as Minnesota would rather violate the first amendment than deal with child rapists.

>>1531766
Ok so you're just saying the guy recording was a child rapist without actually showing any evidence he was.

>>1531767
No he's the child rapist, and now I know for certain you're just here to deliberately waste my time.

>>1531768
Literally where are you getting this info from?

>>1531769
I will not waste any time doing Google searches for you. If you want to leave 4chan and fuck around, go ahead. I'm staying right here.

>>1531770
>If you want to leave 4chan and fuck around, go ahead. I'm staying right here.
Christ dude no need to be so fucking dramatic, I'm literally just asking you to actually show you're not just making shit up.

>>1531771
Yeah and you can kiss my ass, I know exactly where it leads, you're literally the copypasta

>>1531734
>But the guy filming lured a 16 year old girl into his trailer and raped her along with another guy, and the charges were dropped.
So looking into this, apparently this guy was accused of raping a 16 year old a few years ago, but the charges got completely dropped "in the interests of justice". What this means is kinda unclear but apparently the victim literally left the state and refused to cooperate with the investigation any further. Whether this means it was a false accusation or not is anyone's guess, but in either case it's kinda impossible to make a case when your only witness just fucks off and refuses to even testify remotely.

But anyways, it's not like the woman could've known that, she just decided to start hurling slurs on a playground.

>>1531772
Anon literally all you had to do was find a report saying he was a child rapist. You're spurging out over basic "wait is that true?" questions.

>>1531773
I think it's more likely that the girl was just tired of reliving her trauma and didn't want to deal with it anymore. But like you said, it's anyone's guess. It took over three years for the attorney's office to get around to a rape case, but it took just over year to prosecute a woman who said naughty words, which is insane. A man who shouldn't even be allowed on a children's playground was recording a woman who said naughty words, and the woman was the one who got in trouble. The priorities of the district attorney are completely fucked up to say the least.

This case is going to be slapped down so hard be the appeals courts. I'm wondering how much money she's going to milk from the DA violating her first amendment rights.

>>1531774
The other anon was able to Google search, why can't you? Get on it retard.

>>1531775
>This case is going to be slapped down so hard be the appeals courts. I'm wondering how much money she's going to milk from the DA violating her first amendment rights.
Not really because she had no way of knowing any of this backstory and you can't just start randomly calling people slurs in public, especially around children.

Like if I go and punch someone in the back of the head, it turning out that person murdered someone 10 years ago doesn't change the fact I assaulted them. You don't get a free pass just because you got lucky and hit a bad person when you had no idea about their past.

>It took over three years for the attorney's office to get around to a rape case, but it took just over year to prosecute a woman who said naughty words, which is insane
One of these cases was on video fuckwit. It's far easier to make a case when you have firsthand evidence, especially when the accuser doesn't fucking vanish.

>>1531775
>I make claims and then don't support them but its your fault I can't provide a 5 second google search I would've already had to make to make the claim in the first place
ok retard.

>>1531776
>Not really because she had no way of knowing any of this backstory and you can't just start randomly calling people slurs in public, especially around children.
You absolutely can insult people in public, especially around children. That's what the first amendment is for. Now there are certain types of speech that are not protected, like threats "I'm going to kill you", speech that causes mass panic "FIRE FIRE!", or fighting words like "Come fight me bitch". But none of what she said falls under any of those exceptions. She was walking away from the child rapist the whole time while holding a baby. You may not like that she said "nigger", but the first amendment allows us to yell it as much as we want.

>Like if I go and punch someone in the back of the head, it turning out that person murdered someone 10 years ago doesn't change the fact I assaulted them. You don't get a free pass just because you got lucky and hit a bad person when you had no idea about their past.
You're conflating two different things. Punching someone in the back of the head is illegal, calling someone a nigger isn't.

>>1531777
Yeah I have a principle of not spending more time on my replies than I think the person I'm responding to did. The conversation I'm having with the other anon is much more interesting.

>>1531778
>You absolutely can insult people in public, especially around children. That's what the first amendment is for.
Disorderly conduct as a charge existing disagrees with you. As does the fact SHE WAS FOUND GUILTY BY A JURY YOU BRAINLET.

>You're conflating two different things. Punching someone in the back of the head is illegal, calling someone a nigger isn't.
Funny how she got convicted then.

>>1531779
>I can't be fucked to back up my claims that would take 5 seconds to prove
ok schizo.

>>1531778
>Now there are certain types of speech that are not protected, like threats "I'm going to kill you", speech that causes mass panic "FIRE FIRE!", or fighting words like "Come fight me bitch". But none of what she said falls under any of those exceptions.
You know except for the part where she said "mind your own fucking business" which qualifies as fighting words.

But hey keep defending this bitch that's gonna have to live off that fundraiser for the rest of her life considering how there's no way she gets a decent job with this as the face of her online presence.

>>1531780
Am I really going to be the first person to tell you that the government isn't perfect? That the government makes tons of mistakes? Juries make wrongful convictions all the time, and this is one of them. The appeals courts will absolutely slap this down.

>>1531783
What she was doing is textbook disorderly conduct anon. If I go to a public park and start loudly calling everyone slurs I'd probably have to do community service too.

>>1531782
"mind your own fucking business" qualifies as fighting words? What crack are you smoking?

She's gonna get an even bigger payout from the government for first amendment violations. Paid for by the taxpayers of Rochester.

>>1531769
He's projecting as usual, and doing anything he can to avoid the topic of the thread — the cringy faggot who keeps getting arrested for doing edgy stunts

>>1531784
She was textbook expressing her first amendment privileges. If you went to a public park and started yelling slurs, I would assume you were a member of the Westboro Baptist church.

>>1531641
And this justifies racial slurs how?

>>1531785
>She's gonna get an even bigger payout from the government for first amendment violations. Paid for by the taxpayers of Rochester.
Yeah anon, go argue that shouting the n word repeatedly in a public playground isn't disrupting the peace. I'm sure this'll go real well for you in court.

The irony is she got found not guilty in regards to the kid because she only said it once. But then she spurged the fuck out at a black guy recording her and started yelling it over and over, meaning it went from "one-off offensive statement" to "public disruption" which lands you squarely in disorderly conduct territory.

>>1531787
>https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.72
>Subdivision 1.Crime. Whoever does any of the following in a public or private place, including on a school bus, knowing, or having reasonable grounds to know that it will, or will tend to, alarm, anger or disturb others or provoke an assault or breach of the peace, is guilty of disorderly conduct, which is a misdemeanor:
>(3) engages in offensive, obscene, abusive, boisterous, or noisy conduct or in offensive, obscene, or abusive language tending reasonably to arouse alarm, anger, or resentment in others.
Pretty black and white in regards to what she was doing.

Interesting how any thread about a news report that makes conservatives gets derailed by conservatives.

>>1531792
Returning to the retard at hand; surely he's gonna be in prison again considering he's already out on bail in Minnesota for smashing a $6000 sculpture, right?

>>1531791
>NOTE: In State v. Hensel, 901 N.W.2d 166 (Minn 2017), subdivision 1, clause (2), was held unconstitutional under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution because it is substantially overbroad.
Interesting. I expect the third clause will similarly get struck down too when this case reaches the appeals court.

This statute is ridiculous up and down. But the even more ridiculous thing is, is that this woman needed thousands of dollars of donations to even attempt to defend her first amendment rights. I'm sure there are many more people, however imperfect they may be, in Minnesota who've had there first amendment rights violated, but didn't have the funds necessary to defend themselves.

This is the end goal of far leftists, making all speech they don't like illegal. First they call all speech they don't like violence, then they get the government to prosecute people for inciting violence. It reminds me of that one political compass meme:

>auth left - the N-word is illegal
>auth right - fuck niggers
>lib left - my nigga!
>lib right - how much for the nigger?

Minnesota is auth left.

>>1531794
you're literally not american

>>1531794
>Interesting. I expect the third clause will similarly get struck down too when this case reaches the appeals court.
>Uh well, their whole law is wrong!
Anon you need to understand the FEDERAL definition of Disorderly Conduct is pretty much the same
>https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/36/2.34

>This statute is ridiculous up and down. But the even more ridiculous thing is, is that this woman needed thousands of dollars of donations to even attempt to defend her first amendment rights. I'm sure there are many more people, however imperfect they may be, in Minnesota who've had there first amendment rights violated, but didn't have the funds necessary to defend themselves.
Anon her final fine was 1k and 200 hours of community service. She didn't need all that money she just used it as a chance to grift.

>>1531794
>heh, a blatant violation of the first amendment, those activist juries are the only reasons he was found guilty
>Here's the legal definition that fits exactly what she did
>WELL THEN ITS THE LAW THAT IS WRONG AND SHE'LL WIN SO EPICALLY ON APPEAL THAT'LL GO AWAY!

>>1531796
It's pretty much _not_ the same. What she did does not fall under any of those clauses.

>Anon her final fine was 1k and 200 hours of community service
Wow! _ONLY_ 200 hours of community service! You also forgot to mention that she was also placed on probation, which means she needs to check in with a probation officer regularly, can't leave the state without permission, can't drink, and whatever other bullshit comes along with probation.

>>1531797
State laws get struck down for being unconstitutional all the time retard

>>1531799
>What she did does not fall under any of those clauses.
Really?
>Uses language, an utterance, or gesture, or engages in a display or act that is obscene, physically threatening or menacing, or done in a manner that is likely to inflict injury or incite an immediate breach of the peace.
>Makes noise that is unreasonable, considering the nature and purpose of the actor's conduct, location, time of day or night, and other factors that would govern the conduct of a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances.

I know you are fucking brainrotted, but reasonable noise does not include screeching slurs at a playground. And slurs are also considered pretty obscene by the general populace.

>>1531800
Yeah and I'm sure you're gonna get real far arguing that the entire concept of disorderly conduct is a violation of your first amendment rights.

Public spaces have rules retard.

>>1531799
your crocodile tears for this shitstirring karen amuse me, shill anon

>>1531799
>You also forgot to mention that she was also placed on probation, which means she needs to check in with a probation officer regularly, can't leave the state without permission, can't drink, and whatever other bullshit comes along with probation.
Fucking good. Don't start spurging out on a playground and you won't have to deal with this type of restriction.

Bitch is gonna need all that money she grifted btw because no respectable business is gonna want "Woman famous for yelling slurs at autistic child" on their payroll.

>>1531801
Alright let me spell it out for you:
>Uses language, an utterance, or gesture, or engages in a display or act that is obscene, physically threatening or menacing, or done in a manner that is likely to inflict injury or incite an immediate breach of the peace.
None of what she did or would have inflicted injury or breached the peace.
>Makes noise that is unreasonable, considering the nature and purpose of the actor's conduct, location, time of day or night, and other factors that would govern the conduct of a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances.
This regards stuff like playing loud music or honking your car horn in the middle of the night. Yelling nigger in the middle of the day doesn't count.

>And slurs are also considered pretty obscene by the general populace.
Obscene, yes. Illegal, no.

>>1531806
god your life is humiliating

>>1531806
>None of what she did or would have inflicted injury or breached the peace.
Yelling slurs at a playground is breaching the peace retard.

>This regards stuff like playing loud music or honking your car horn in the middle of the night. Yelling nigger in the middle of the day doesn't count.
Again, don't yell slurs at a playground.

So why weren't these racist morons shot? I've been told that hitting an officer with your car and being disruptive is deserves being murdered, but despite actual proof an officer got hit by a protesters car the shills are claiming its free speech?

60 posts make it look like the ESL is crying and evading logic again

>>1531808
>Yelling slurs at a playground is breaching the peace retard.
No it's not. Especially not after being goaded to repeat the slurs by the guy filming. If anything, he was the one breaching the peace.
>Again, don't yell slurs at a playground.
Opinion noted.

>>1531812
watch out for spiderman nerd

>>1531813
They know that yelling slurs in public is illegal, it just comforts them to think they could if they weren't too cowardly.

>>1531814
My pronouns are she/her shitlord. Turn yourself into the nearest police station for misgendering me.

>>1531815
>misgendering me
No one on this board thinks you're a man, esl shill

>>1531816
Thank-you :^)

>>1531812
>Especially not after being goaded to repeat the slurs by the guy filming
"your honor, she was merely repeatedly saying the slur she already yelled at a child. And then directed at him while still screeching like a banshee."

To use your own example, if someone told me to honk my car repeatedly in the middle of the night, the fact I still fucking did it means I'm still responsible for doing so.

>>1531812
>No it's not
yeah it's really common to just go on a playground and scream slurs at people. Basically part of daily operations.

>>1531819
You're still under the wrong impression that calling someone a nigger is illegal in the United States. It's not. Blaring your horn in the middle of the night is illegal.

>>1531820
Yeah for me it's just called Monday afternoon.

>>1531821
>You're still under the wrong impression that calling someone a nigger is illegal in the United States. It's not. Blaring your horn in the middle of the night is illegal.
Being a public disturbance is illegal. Shrieking slurs at children and people watching is disturbing the public.

Now go donate the bitch another $500. She's gonna need it when she can't get a job because this is the first thing that turns up on any background check.

>>1531823
esl shill is aware that his opinion is wrong, but unless he gets a real job he will have to continue losing the same argument in a sisyphean manner. he definitely doesn't have 500 dollars to spare though

>>1531825
They're also not allowed within 1000 feet of a school to prove that it is legal to yell slurs at a child

Kinda gay how if I say it, I get banned for "racism outside of /b/" but no one else seems to.

>why am I the only one retarded enough to get banned for slurs

>>1531823
>Being a public disturbance is illegal. Shrieking slurs at children and people watching is disturbing the public.
No it's not. Otherwise the Westboro Baptist Church would have been banned long ago.

>>1531843
maybe if this goofy karen obtained a permit for calling little kids nigger like the WBC does, she wouldn't be in trouble. she did not though

>>1531844
>Oi mate, you got yer n-word loicense?
This isn't bongland retard, you don't need a loicense to call someone a nigger. God damn you're stupid.

>>1531845
you're the one who brought up the westboro baptist church esl shill, direct that anger inward

>>1531846
>you're
your

>>1531847
i rest my case

>>1531848
I rest my balls on your mom's face

wow, i guess esl shill doesn't just have gay rape fantasies

>>1531850
You're mom is a man?

never mind

Damn it feels good to win.

>>1531603
Has anyone ever been pardoned multiple times?

>>1531654
>me when I still dont realize everybody is racist and its a universal truth

>>1531781
Im not the other anon youre arguing with but I just wanted to let you know that you lost and he won

>>1531875
you're not very good at your job esl shill

>>1531873
Where do you people get this shit from?

>>1531888
you mom's scat videos.

as if his life couldn't get more humiliating, esl shill has revealed he has a scat fetish

>>1531907
esl is esl'ing again what esl-e would esl do

>>1531888
>Homos obsessed with killing whiteness can't believe it

>>1531910
>>1531913
here's your attention

>>1531914
omg thank you

>>1531775
>The other anon was able to Google search, why can't you? Get on it retard.
what he found in google search disagreed with you.

>>1531603
Texas actually just put out an active warrant for him because him doing this made them revoke his bond agreement. Good job numbnuts.