Trump scores major win as Supreme Court clears way for mail-in voting order ahead of 2026 midtermshttps://nypost.com/2026/08/24/us-news/supreme-court-clears-the-way-for-trump-mail-voting-order-in-advance-of-midterms/Fake news link, featuring statement from, notable retard and obvious activist shitlord, Ketanji:"Brown" Jacksonhttps://apnews.com/article/trump-mail-voting-supreme-court-157afc3c195ce0a62c522da5ce904b04And since AP is crap, if you chose to read it, here's what's going on:https://apnews.com/article/postal-service-midterms-trump-mail-voting-b4b9ef095b4d6bceab18adbb34814640Real new:The Supreme Court ruled Monday that President Trump’s executive order tightening the rules around mail-in voting can be implemented ahead of the November midterm elections.The 6-3 decision — with liberal Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor dissenting — marks a major victory for Trump, but appears to leave room for future legal challenges that could delay the president’s order. In its ruling, the high court overturned a lower court order that blocked the Trump administration from enforcing the March 31 mail-in voting order in response to a lawsuit filed by 23 Democratic-led states, who argued the directive unconstitutionally infringes on their authority to administer elections. The Supreme Court did not rule on whether Trump’s order was lawful, but determined it was too early for states to sue over it because harms must be “concrete” rather than “conjectural or hypothetical.” The majority further noted that federal courts are barred from adjudicating disputes dependent on “contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all.”The injunction lifted by the high court had applied to the 23 states challenging the president’s order.Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James, who was part of the lawsuit, vowed that the “fight is far from over.”
The obvious cheater who lacks morals continued, “This decision is a painful setback, but it will not be the final word,” James said in a statement. “The right to vote is sacred, and no administration should be allowed to put that right in jeopardy by making it harder for eligible voters to cast their ballots.“This fight is far from over. We are exploring our legal options."Similarly, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro pledged, “We’ll see the Trump Administration in court.” “Not so fast,” the democratic swing-state governor wrote on X after the Supreme Court ruling. “Today’s SCOTUS decision does NOT deal with the substance of Trump’s unconstitutional Executive Order and does not mean his illegal attempt to restrict mail-in voting will go forward. “Donald Trump does not run elections here in Pennsylvania — or in any state.” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) called the ruling “a disgrace” and likened it to thrusting a “dagger into the heart of our democracy.”“Trump’s effort to turn the Postal Service into a voter suppression machine is blatantly unconstitutional – yet his MAGA Supreme Court is refusing to stop it from going forward,” Schumer raged on X. “Trump’s malicious effort to stop mail-in voting is nothing but election interference in broad daylight.”Trump’s executive order calls for the creation of a list of eligible voters and directed the US Postal Service (USPS) to deliver mail ballots only to people on those lists.“I believe it’s foolproof, and maybe it’ll be tested. Maybe it won’t,” Trump said at the signing ceremony. “It’s about voter integrity; we want to have honest voting in our country.”The order called for the Department of Homeland Security, working in conjunction with the Social Security Administration, to create the voter lists.Meanwhile, the Department of Justice is tasked with investigating any wrongdoing in mail-in ballot distribution.
esl shill is larping as an american again
States that disobey the order may lose federal funds.The USPS on Friday published a rule that would require states to provide them with lists of voters who received mail-in ballots at least 60 days before the midterm elections.Under the rule, the Postal Service will not send mail ballots from any state that does not comply with Trump’s order.When the rule was proposed in June, USPS Postmaster General David Steiner said it would allow his agency to “match the ballots that a state believes they’re sending out to what actually gets sent out.”Trump has long been a staunch critic of mail-in voting, despite using the process himself to cast an absentee ballot in last week’s Florida primary election. The president and his allies argue mail-in voting is susceptible to fraud. In dissent, Sotomayor and Kagan argued the 23 states did have standing to sue ‘based on the credible threat that the Government will initiate investigations and prosecutions because they refuse to use the lists.” Jackson, in a separate dissent, warned that the ruling “injects additional unknowns into the already fraught pre-election period,” including whether future challenges to the mail-in voting order, or other election-related matters, may come “too late” in the cycle.The Supreme Court previously ruled against the Trump administration in a different mail-in voting matter.In June, the high court ruled that states can count ballots that arrive after polls closed as long as they were postmarked by Election Day.Unlike Monday’s ruling, that case was not part of the court’s emergency docket. About 30% of all ballots cast in the 2024 presidential election were mail-in votes, according to federal data reviewed by the Associated Press.
>>1531915Why are Dems so butthurt about this? Is it possible they cheat with mail-in ballots?
>>1531923why do you always talk to yourself? is it because nobody actually agrees with you
>>1531924i know anon needs to quit samefagging after all there are only 3 posters on this board 1 esl shill and us making fun of him
>>1531923No, you cannot cheat with them. However, people who ordinarily have difficulty accessing voting places (jobs, disabilities, isolation, lack of transport access, etc.) NEED mail-in ballots and somewhat unsurprisingly those people tend to vote blue, hence the Republican obsession with destroying that particular institution of democracy.
>>1531924esl shill's brain damage has become worsei hope they don't figure out liberals would be triggered if they reported themselves to the nearest mental hospital and checked themselves inliberals would HATE IT and be SO TRIGGERED
>>1531960>Dead people need them to voteUnderstood. Why not look into how this slop-trash policy is implemented in blue states, the report back about the poor olds a cripples.
Gentle reminder: we're now at the point where we found illegals voting.However, it's supposedly not a big deal because it didn't influence the outcome of any election.
>>1531966Fuck off retard
>>1531984>No argumentConcession accepted. Thanks again.
>>1531915>The Supreme Court did not rule on whether Trump’s order was lawful, but determined it was too early for states to sue over it because harms must be “concrete” rather than “conjectural or hypothetical.” What a fucking joke. >>1531966Dead people aren't voting, ESL.
>>1531994Aha so it's just illegals using their identities.Makes sense.
>>1531996No.
>>1531997IDK we'll see what happens.
>>1531998>IDKI believe you.
>>1531915So basically:>Yeah it might be illegal but while we "debate" that he can just do itSpineless fucks. This court needs to go.
>>1531981>Gentle reminder: we're now at the point where we found illegals voting.This has and will be the case in literally every election ever held in any country on earth.
>>1532014So now we've entered a time where voter fraud does happen?Interesting. When did the worldlines shift?
>>1532016HELLO! Time traveler from the year 2018. I remember elections being safe and secure. I also remember when that 4 case of voter fraud happen every year, but they're all Republicans.
>>1532017I too have a memory longer than that of a retarded gebil.
>>1532016There's always some fraud. Not just in voting, in everything. Nothing's perfect, people gonna people. The question is how much and if it influences the result. This has always been the case. MAGA is arguing that there's massive amounts of fraud to the point it's flipping the results of elections. This has never been the case. There is no evidence of this being true.
>>1532010They're doing that with the ballroom too. Fucking traitors.
>>1532019Real trying to find evidence has never been tried. And any attempt to do so has caused a drastic reaction from Democrats.The circumstantial evidence is clear.
>>1532021Yes it has. They've been looking for years. There's nothing. They KNOW there's nothing. But they keep pushing this crap so they can have more restrictions on voting and reduce faith in the entire democratic process.
>>1532023No it hasn't.
>>1532024>nuh uh!Compelling.
>>1532027So, you're telling me there's nothing to find but every attempt to investigate is met with massive pushback from Dems?You do understand the problem there, right? And it's mostly that you're in a cult.
>>1532039I'm telling you there's nothing to find because in all of MAGAs searching they've found jack shit. >every attempt to investigate is met with massive pushback from Dems?That's not true.
>>1532040>That's not true.lol OK, faggot.
>>1532045Glad you agree with reality, anon. Please try to do that more often.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/white-house-defends-trumps-ability-vote-by-mail-2026-08-18/>“As President Trump has said, the SAVE America Act has commonsense exceptions for Americans to use mail-in ballots for (mental) illness, disability.." White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales said when asked about .. Trump
>>1531915>low IQ NYpost reader says the AP is crap>has no idea what's actually happening>doesn't realize states control elections at the county level and not the federal government or the post officelel what a moron
>>1531981>Gentle reminder: we're now at the point where we found illegals voting.source? how many voted?
>>1532084>source? how many voted?"Every legitimate study ever done on the question shows that voting by noncitizens in state and federal elections is vanishingly rare. That includes the Brennan Center’s own study of 42 jurisdictions in the 2016 general election. We found that election officials in those places, who oversaw the tabulation of 23.5 million votes, referred only an estimated 30 incidents of suspected noncitizen voting for further investigation or prosecution. In other words, even suspected — not proven — noncitizen votes accounted for just 0.0001 percent of the votes cast."This is what you get with actual research"CLAIM: A Census Bureau report looking at 128 million voters proves that more than 24,000 noncitizens voted in the 2020 election.THE FACTS: This is false. The report says it checked data from a commercial voter file against federal records to identify noncitizens who allegedly voted in the election. According to experts, the methodology described in the report may have created false positives if, for example, an individual’s name was linked to the wrong address or their citizenship status hadn’t been updated in a certain database. Details about error rates and how the report ensured accurate results were not included.“This is the weakest methodology descriHmption I’ve ever seen in a Census Bureau publication,” said Mark Lindeman, policy and strategy director at Verified Voting, a nonpartisan group focused on election technology. “This document doesn’t tell us anything about elections. It just shows that the Census Bureau has gone off the rails.”He added that the Census Bureau is not clear about which databases it used in its analysis, which he said “exists essentially as a propaganda offering,” and that it does not explain likely sources of errors."This is what you get with MAGA retarded research
>>1532078Interesting. You do know the federal government controls the post office though, right?>>1532084I don't recall. Hundreds out of 10s of thousands "accidentally" registered.>>1532131Doesn't explain why Democrats always try to block attempts to investigate. Also most studies are fake and gay.
>>1532135>Doesn't explain why Democrats always try to block attempts to investigate. They don't.>Also most studies are fake and gay.And you were born after your dad had diarrhea in your mom's syphilis-ridden pussy. And now we all have to suffer your retardation because of them.
>>1532135Do you get paid to regurgitate debunked talking points or are you crazy enough to actually believe this shit?
>>1532135>I don't recall. Hundreds out of 10s of thousands "accidentally" registered.source?>>1532135>Doesn't explain why Democrats always try to block attempts to investigate. Also most studies are fake and gay.source?
>>1532144>source?It was posted here not too long ago.>>>Doesn't explain why Democrats always try to block attempts to investigate. Also most studies are fake and gay.Uh, bro... seriously? You're the source on this one.
>>1532179>It was posted here not too long ago.Link?>Uh, bro... seriously? You're the source on this one.Link?
>>1532188>LinkCheck the catalog.>LinkYou're seething about it in this thread.
>>1532246>Check the catalog.No, whore, I'm not going to make your argument for you. Prove your own fucking point. >You're seething about it in this thread.Nothing in this thread proves that Democrats blocking attempts to investigate election fraud, nor that most studies are fake and gay.
>>1532256Not my fault you're uninformed. There's little incentive for me to deal with the ill-informed fuckwits of the universe one at a time.
>>1532260So you're pulling it out of your ass and it's as full of shit as ever. As expected.
>>1532261>lazy>Ill-informed>pants shitting What do I get if I hold your little helpless baby hand?
>>1532265You could prove your point. Maybe win the argument.
>>1532267Worthless to do such a stupid fucking thing.Will this slay the gay demons inside you and cure you of your commie mind virus?I don't think so. You'll simply regroup and continue your shit.
>>1532269Then concession accepted, loser.
>>1532270A fine win via being wholly uneducated and entirely ill-informed. You can have the "win".
>>1532039What investigation? Every investigation made reveals the same thing: maybe double-digit cases of genuine fraud out of BILLIONS of votes cast. A rounding error. There hasn't been an investigation that shows what you want, yet you continue to push this bullshit. You think you'd get pushback if there was genuine evidence of fraud, if it turned out illegals are a problem? NO! The left worships institutions to a fault, the idea that the most basic one of them all is on shaky ground is abhorrent! But there's no evidence of that, and every time you pretend there is, it's clearly a naked attempt to ensure your side wins forevermore. Why close DMV offices in poor areas? Why only allow forms of ID that old rich people would have and not anything a young person would have? Why force people to work on election day, then make it the only day to vote? Why is there never a concession to make legitimate votes EASIER, or to raise proper participation in the democratic process? There's your 'pushback'. There's your 'fight'. It's to stop bullshit that tries to suppress the most basic and fundamental right of citizens in this republic.
>>1532317>demonrats for years: there is no fraud lalala i cant hear you lalala if i dont look at the fraud it isnt happening lalal>..o..ok maybe we are literally frauding elections because we are sack of shit democrats b..but that doesnt count c..cause its only a few cases or something.... and it doesnt matter that these case are just the ones discovered and we got away with more fraud... also just because we steal elections doesnt mean we need vote id... voter id is racist or something despite the rest of the developed world using it...move the goal post some more why dont you you sack of traitor shit
>>1532317voter id would solve all of this and make it beyond clear so the fact that you dont want it proves that you know you are stealing and frauding elections
