>For example, the way the system is designed, if even one barcode on one ballot in a bulk mailing of 10,000 ballots failed to properly scan during the verification process, the entire batch is rejected and sent back to the state, effectively stopping the ballots from being mailed to voters and depriving them of their vote.https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/whistleblower-usps-systems-mail-ballots-flawed-rcna595361An anonymous federal official warned in a whistleblower complaint this week that the technical system the U.S. Postal Service built for mail voting is flawed, untested and likely to cause major disruptions in this fall’s midterm elections if it is implemented.President Donald Trump signed an executive order in March that directed his administration to create federal lists of citizens and asked the Postal Service to transmit mail ballots to only those people. A federal judge has blocked the order from going into effect amid ongoing litigation over its constitutionality; the whistleblower complaint highlights potential issues that could arise if the courts ultimately declare it lawful.The USPS typically is responsible only for transporting mail ballots between election officials and voters, and the federal government has never kept a central list of all American citizens. Trump ordered the agency to take on an unprecedented and complex role in the process this year amid a broader attempt to exert greater control over the country’s elections and his continued unfounded claims of widespread voter fraud.The technical system the USPS assembled to vet voters was developed in a “rushed, chaotic, and fundamentally flawed process,” according to a whistleblower complaint sent to the office of Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., a member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Blumenthal sent the complaint to Postmaster General David Steiner on Monday asking for more information.
“This administration seems hell-bent on changing the framework of casting ballots in this country, clearly for political reasons,” Blumenthal said on a call with reporters Monday. “It is unconstitutional, as is argued in the courts by the litigation that is ongoing, but this disclosure indicates that it is also blatantly incompetent and incapable of actually delivering ballots that are lawful in this midterm election.”The whistleblower is identified as an anonymous federal official who is being represented by Whistleblower Aid, a nonprofit group that represents public- and private-sector employees making such complaints. They allege that the USPS didn’t begin building its portal for verifying ballots “in earnest” until June, giving itself less than three months to complete a system that would ordinarily take at least nine to 12 months to build.The agency last month finalized the rule for how it would implement the changes, which would create a massive new workload for election officials and put up hurdles for millions of voters to cast ballots by mail.Large batches of ballots would be rejected by the portal if even a single ballot couldn’t be verified, the whistleblower said.“As presently designed, if even one bar code on one single ballot in a bulk-mailing of 10,000 ballots fails to properly scan during the verification process, the entire batch is rejected and sent back to the state — effectively stopping the ballots from being mailed to voters,” the complaint reads. “Even under ordinary circumstances this would be problematic because of predictable errors in any barcode scanning process.”
The whistleblower said workers involved in developing the USPS system feared it would crash and described the process just days before the project was originally scheduled to be released to the public Tuesday as a “s--- show,” according to the complaint.The whistleblower also said the USPS had ordered workers to continue developing its system, despite court orders blocking implementation of the project.A federal court order Monday stated that the government could continue building its portal as long as the states aren’t required to participate.
>whistleblower You mean liggeral operative trying to facilitate illegal voting and stealing the election from MAGA?
>>1533485Sound like it'll be the safest and most secure election since 2020 to me
>>1533495So you're saying the 2016 and 2024 were unsecured and stolen by trump and his co-conspirators, the Russians.
>>1533485Why stop at 10,000? Why not 50,000?
Pure fascism. 2026 will be a trial run for 2028.
fun fact for conspiracy theorists: paper ballots, especially from overseas military and government employees, are not counted unless a race is close. Most states count most domestic mail-in ballots but many do not bother in races and issues won by large enough margins. It has always been this way.Not too long ago, nearly all voting was in person with the exception of active-duty military and federal employees far from their home districts. This goes back to the early 1796 and there was a huge increase in absentee voting during the Civil War. Civilian absentee voting had been very minor prior to the 1970.So get off your lazy ass and go vote.
>>1533485>and the federal government has never kept a central list of all American citizensYou can tell the goal isn't to actually get a list of noncitizens, because it would be incredibly easy for the Federal government to make this list.
>>15335021968 was a trial run for every subsequent election.2000 was a trial run for every presidential election of this century.The day after Trump won the election in November 2024, three things happened:1) Project 2025 handbook was published. It was called "By Dawn's Early Light" and it was ghosted by JD Vance.2) President Trump announced that he would "have to be a dicator for awhile"3) Trump stated that this was the last time anyone had to vote for president.
>>1533507Sounds good. I'm voting Trump 2028, BTW. Hope he wins, because it'll be hilarious to see Democrats complain about democracy.
>>1533485That makes sense because Democrats ship out pallets of fake votes. Send them all back and manually verify it. That's how the 2020 election was stolen
Shills out in force tonight. Whistleblower must be dead-on.
>>1533504It would be very easy, but every time the US Gov asks the states say no. Weird.
>>1533522>Just have them send all the ballots back>And also only ballots we get on election day count
>>1533526Yes. Problem?
>>1533496There's verified evidence that the Clintons and Obama were spying on the Trump campaign.
>>1533485>For example, the way the system is designed, if even one barcode on one ballot in a bulk mailing of 10,000 ballots failed to properly scan during the verification process, the entire batch is rejected and sent back to the state, effectively stopping the ballots from being mailed to voters and depriving them of their vote.I would live to know what the supposed reason for this is.
>>1533529maybe because he's a foreign asset and criminal. nixon bitched about the same thing
>>1533503People don't understand just how few people show up to vote for non presidential elections. South Carolina is suffering from voter fatigue for all of the elections and only 1,800 people turned out in the largest city for the senate run off. One subdivision worth of people in the largest city in a state
>>1533529There’s also verified evidence that the Russians were assisting the Trump campaign.
>>1533530Why do people do this? You just take the statement of an anonymous whistleblower as being the absolute truth. >>1533531>maybe because he's a foreign asset and criminal2016+10 and you're still with this shit?
>>1533531Surely you have proof of those claims
>>1533534excited to die for israel? (it's sarcasm, we all know you're literally not american)
>>1533536>excited to die for israel?>we all know you're literally not americanIronically, a very turdie thing to say
>>1533534It matches the pattern of voter suppression MAGA is following.
>>1533538I think the problem is that you uncritically consume media which confirms your biases, thereby amplifying your biases and creating a self-perpetuating radicalization-loop.
>>1533537you're projecting again. i wonder if brian mcginnis' arm healed properly
>>1533539Projection.
>>1533534>You just take the statement of an anonymous whistleblower as being the absolute truth.So then will the Trump admin say come out and say they're wrong? Surely it should be easy to do if they're lying.
>>1533540>absolutely incoherent response >>1533541>Projection.No, not really. My politics are the same they have been since I was in college. You, on the other hand, are spouting resist-lib nonsense.
>>1533543blatantly admitting you don't know how to read doesn't win arguments you know
>>1533542>So then will the Trump admin say come out and say they're wrong? Surely it should be easy to do if they're lying.99% sure that this story, like tens of thousands before will be resolved as yet another nothingburger. However, it wont stop you spazzing out about it for the next 24 hours, and deepening your radicalization, until you completely forget about it and move onto the next psyop.
>>1533530During the Bush vs Gore election, one of the biggest claims of voter fraud was that the "samples" of ballots given for recounts appeared to have been sorted and tampered with. Now there was no proof to substanstiate that claim, but in retrospect, it was probably true based on the fact that now they know that they have to reject entire lots of ballots because the chances of the entire lot being tampered is probably guaranteed.
>>1533544>you dont know how to read>he says to someone >on a text-based forum The incoherence grows stronger.
>>1533547well, esl shill, we accept your concession. thanks for playing
>>1533546Probably this. If ballots are sent out with sequenced barcodes. And you get an sequenced ballot in the batch, then someone has probably done something to it. Its no big deal, you just send out a different batch of ballots.
>>1533548>esl shillthere it is, he's starting to get upset.> we accept your concession.Again, totally incoherent response. Its like talking to a mid-2000's chatbot.
esl shill is projecting again
>>1533551>esl shill is projecting againAgain, totally incoherent. What am I projecting? That I'm a mid-2000's chatbot?
at least esl shill comes when called
>>1533554>at least esl shill comes when calledAgain, no coherence whatsoever. I was posting in the thread long before you called me esl shill. How can the person who was here before you be "come" if they are present before you?
how is esl shill so upset with his name when it's how he identifies himself by now
>>1533546That’s nonsense.
>>1533558>how is esl shill so upset with his name when it's how he identifies himself by nowThis statement makes absolutely no sense, and who the fuck are you posting to?
hi esl shill. never get a real job
>>1533554gotta indulge the humiliation fetishthey're getting less and less hits on grindr as word spreads about them
>>1533558>his>he>himselfdon't indulge their delusions
>>1533563You know I enjoy this right? Like, I just dissect your posts and eventually you get so flustered you stop replying and start samefagging. Its too easy.
esl shill thinks the revelation of his humiliation fetish is novel information
>>1533568I think its hilarious that you're developing lore for this non-entity you chase around the internet. Does it give your life meaning?
hmm, esl shill considers himself a non-entity. maybe the coward's way out is closer than we think
>>1533566>samefaggingBut don't let that ruin your schizo sense of achievement
>>1533571>>1533572look how desperate you are for attention. I just ignore your post and immediatly you (You) me. lol. lmao even.
god esl shill's life is humiliating. surely he doesn't even believe his lies
>>1533575>he>his
>>1533529So you admit he was conspiring with the Russians and a traitor.
>>1533549>no big dealExcept it's on a deadline and odds are people who don't vote for trump loyalists are going to fidn their barcodes magically not working.
I hope President Trump runs again. I want another 4 years.
>>1533532Deferred responsibility; the mentality that someone else will do it. Also probably just political fatigue. Thats still wild to hear about how few people actually voted though
>>1533549>Its no big deal, you just send out a different batch of ballots.Except they're also trying to make it so that the only ballots that count are the ones that arrive on election day. Oh, it just so happens that one ballot in this entire bulk didn't scan? Send the whole thing back. Oh, it's literally the day before election day? Welp, guess this poling place in a conveniently blue area is going to be shut down :)
>>1533581I don't followHow is Clinton & Obama spying on Trump proof of his guilt?Wouldn't it prove Clinton & Obama's guilt in espionage?
>>1533611They didn't spy on trump, they were exposing him conspiring with the Russians. Don't steal elections and conspire with enemy nations like trump does. Also don't stage coups the times you do lose legitimately. Like trump does.
>>1533614I didn't realize his campaign conspired with the RussiansI was following the Mueller investigation closely, and I never heard about a go between exchanging messages between Trump's campaign and Russia. Could you share those details with me?
>>1533620>Russia if you're listening
>>1533620>and I never heard about a go between exchanging messages between Trump's campaign and Russia. Could you share those details with me?>https://www.npr.org/2020/08/18/903512647/senate-report-former-trump-aide-paul-manafort-shared-campaign-info-with-russia
>>1533614>they were exposing him conspiring with the Russians.2016+10 and still pushing the wholly debunked muh Russia? Lol. Lmao even. >>1533628>Oh no the shared internal polling data with a covert agent they didn't know worked for the Russians Bruh
>>1533629>Already moving the goalposts As expecting of trump/russian conspirators apologists
>>1533629>covert agent they didn't know worked for the RussiansYeah sure they didn't.Also you do realize that still means Obama was correct in that parts of the Trump campaign were communicating with Russia.Oh, and also:>https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/16/us/politics/rick-gates-russia.html>https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/us/politics/carter-page-trump-russia.html>https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-campaign-emails-show-aides-repeated-efforts-to-set-up-russia-meetings/2017/08/14/54d08da6-7dc2-11e7-83c7-5bd5460f0d7e_story.htmlYou know it's weird that this campaign that supposedly never had any links to Russia determined literally had so many members caught talking with Russian officials there's a whole fucking wiki page about it.
>>1533627Do you have the rest of the quote or the context it was said?
>>1533628This article doesn't actually provide any context about the meeting between Paul Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik. It doesn't say when the meeting happened, where it happened, why it happened. What a useless article
>>1533632lol NY Times and WaPo reporting on Russiagate.Ignored.
>>1533635>ew I don't wanna actually address the multiple Trump campaign members caught with links or directly communicating with Russian officials
>>1533636Sure, the AI model ESL shill uses to translate and create shitposts is programmed to not acknowledge it.
>>1533633>Trying to pretend he wasn't conspiring with the Russians.
>>1533643So you do not. It's another hoax, like the very fine people hoaxhttps://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/
>>1533647>No guys he didn't call the Nazis "very fine people", he just said "very fine people on both sides" when one of the sides was nazis and traitor sympathizers
