>>1533622
So Vance admits trump is the anti-christ and is willingly working for him.
He's going to get a deep spot in hell.

Ok but it's antisemitic to NOT bring about the apocalypse. have you considered that?

>>1533622
So, true believers (Democrats) will it happen?

>>1533673
No because it's all made up nonsense. But he helping to make things a lot worse here in this country.

>>1533622
And this retard calls himself catholic.

>>1533622
>In another portion of the interview, Vance claimed he’s focused on “doing as much of God’s work as possible,” shrugging that “if that leads to the end times, OK.”
ohwowitsfuckingnothing

>>1533703
Why angery then?

>>1533706
How is not applying any of the lessons in the bible gods work?

>>1533722
when the shills have to defend takes this egregious, all they can do is gaslight. or the usual off topic deflection

>>1533622
>In our latest news from far-left dogshit website newrepublic.com, JD Vance said THIS!!!
Wow, must be a really slow news night. Thanks Trump for keeping everything safe and boring so shills have to work at it.

see how the shills can't defend it

Christianity is a mental illness

>>1533722
>lessons in the bible
The bible (Christ specifically) says that a person is known by the fruits of the labors.
What are the fruits that MAGA has produced?

>>1533730
they're more prone to the act of deflowering than bearing fruit

>>1533730
A locked down border with illegals getting tossed out and less 2A restrictions.

Low gas prices would've been nice, but once again Jews had to go and fuck everything up.

>>1533722
>you're not being a good Christian
>t. notachristian

>>1533738
psst, esl shill, the bible can be read by anyone, not just christians

>>1533738
>aha I posit that which cannot be proven thus ensuring my victory
>how dare you expect me to respond to the actual topic like some gaytheist?!

>>1533712
>angery

>>1533734
>A locked down border with illegals getting tossed out
lmao, you believe this

>>1533745
Are illegal border crossings at their lowest since disco was a thing? Yes or no.

>I am stupid enough to believe it, and I can prove it!

>No the government is lying! And so is the media! And so is every fact-checker in the world! And so is the Mexican government! And so is the UN. I'm not crazy! You're the one that's crazy! I'll kill you!

>>No the government is lying! And so is the media! And so is every fact-checker in the world! And so is the Mexican government! And so is the UN. I'm not crazy!
Have you payed attention to literally anything that has happened in these last six years?

Do you have any proof beyond "just trust me, bro" and "orange man bad"? No? Well then I'm going to believe CBS News over you when they tell me that the most anti-immigration president we've had in this entire century almost completely stopped illegal border crossings at numbers we haven't seen since the 70s.

>esl delusions are real

>I get my news from TikTok

>>1533750
Imagine being this far gone up the orange man's ass. How does someone get this bad?

>>1533753
You're the one obsessed with dRumpf, you stupid whore. Didn't you realize?

>>1533622
Doesn’t the Bible say trying to predict or bring about the end times is a sin?
Isn’t he supposed to be a catholic?

>>1533774
It says that nobody except God knows the 'appointed time'.
The belief that humans can bring God to earth by checking all the boxes on a list is a belief that originated from eastern european jews. The entire point of Christianity is leaving your fate to the hands of God.

>>1533759
Look at a mirror while you say this.

>>1533775
>The fucking Pope himself calls you one of the worst living Christians and a disgrace to Catholicism 20 minutes before he dies
>Still pretends to be a Christian
I cannot think of anyone alive more spineless and embarrassing than this fat ugly faggot

>>1533777
Why? I haven't been obsessed with getting dRumpf for a decade.
I suppose you didn't realize the world didn't end between 2016 and 2020, and barely anything changed between 2024 and 2026.
A decade of
>The sky is falling
And in 2020 when the sky was actually falling and things were actually going to shit, you sat there and still complained about getting dRumpf.

>>1533774
"Hey JD Vance aren't you worried that war in the middle east will bring about rapture and the second coming of Christ?"
"If my work with Trump leads to the end times, that is OK"
>JD VANCE IS PREDICTING THE END TIMES HE MUST BE A SINNER
???

>>1533779
>caring what the pope says unironically
The pope can say whatever he wants. Christians are supposed to worship God only.

>>1533780
But did you factor in that you're a retarded esl shill obsessively posting on this board because of your terminal TDS brainrot?

>>1533782
and mega churches, the way G*D intended

JD is Bean counting here.

this comment will get a few votes from religious right and won't hurt them too much elsewhere.

>>1533782
So maybe they shouldn't worship Trump and actually hold him to Christian morals. Because he does not follow that moral code in the slightest

>>1533794
>21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.
>22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’
>23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’
Matthew 7:20-23

>>1533781
It goes against scripture, but keep calling yourself a Christian. All it does is make slandering real believers way fucking easier

>>1533796
>“Do I think we are in the end times? I don’t know,” Vance said in the interview released Monday, noting that it would be bad for him spiritually if he were to spend too much time thinking about that query. “While I’m fascinated by it, I think that focusing on it too much can be very bad.

>“I think there are things about the world that make feel like not shocked if the Antichrist was walking among us,” Vance added.

>In another portion of the interview, Vance claimed he’s focused on “doing as much of God’s work as possible,” shrugging that “if that leads to the end times, OK.”
What goes against scripture?

>>1533797
You don't see it?

Its the part where you're a retarded esl shill supporting pedophiles. Go back to your containment board

>>1533797
Facilitating pain and suffering across the globe in the pursuit of bring about the end times, probably.
Just a guess.

>>1533798
>>1533799
Strange deflection but whatever helps you sleep at night
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCpBXzEoG00
JD Vance is a devout Catholic. He hasn't been turned away at the eucharist
https://www.catholicherald.com/article/national/biden-denied-communion-at-mass-in-south-carolina/

>I'm a dumbass esl shill supporting shitty American priests in opposition to the pope
You earned your tranny hooker today, esl shill

>>1533800
>He hasn't been turned away at the eucharist
He puts his trust in man over his faith in God.
Your local bishop isn't God. The pope isn't God. God is God.
>What is God?
God is Truth. And the truth is that Vance is facilitating widespread suffering because he trusts the zionist lobby over his own scripture.
The bible is categorical in the way it differentiates people that are truly faithful to God.
Good fruit is born from good trees. Bad fruit comes from bad trees. The actions you take are indicative of your character, and Vance has lied about doing God's work.

>>1533800
Standard practice for people who support infanticide openly.

>>1533784
Hello jew.

>>1533729
>Christianity is a mental illness
>Also men can get pregnant.

>esl shill got triggered into bringing up their tranny fetish again

>>1533805
Have you considered it is not truly infanticide if you use mental gymnastics thus deflecting all criticism? Actually murdering innocents, protecting the wealthy and discriminating against the poor is what Jesus was teaching in the New Testament all along!

>>1533814
Nope. and nope.
That's why I'll never vote Democrat again.

>>1533814
Murdering the innocent, like the unborn
Protecting the wealthy, like big pharma, Moderna and Pfizer are above reproach, their products are so safe it is illegal to sue them for damages

>>1533803
That is a lot of words to say JD Vance is sinning because he doesn't agree with my politics or political objectives

esl shill is samefagging again

>>1533824
>see because you abort children we have free reign to murder them
You’re right though, abortion goes against Christian teachings but the Democratic Party doesn’t sell itself as one
>muh big pharma
The audacity of this dumb nigger to imply big pharma plays a side in politics lmao
Remind me again which president authorized operation warp speed?

you're a faggot, esl shill

>>1533832
Technically we do have free reign to murdrer people who commit infanticide at least according to the teachings of the Catholic church.

>>1533832
Only one side voted to give trillions to companies via ACA.
Who was that again?

>>1533803
and Yahweh is a false lower ''god'' and Christianity is a man-made psyop

>>1533837
mitt romney?

>>1533839
Uh oh, now we're going to get esl logic that the GOP Presidential candidate for 2012 is actually a democrat

>>1533837
>giving healthcare to your fellow man is as unchristian as taking care of the poor!
I’d love to hear the logic of Jesus behind this one

>>1533844
The use of state force to redistribute capital is not the same as charitable giving.

>>1533832
That president didn't try to impose a Vaxx mandate on federal employees to the point of being blocked by the Supreme Court, only to apply the same mandate to the US military causing thousands of military personnel who were not at risk and at the peak of physical fitness to be fired from their jobs.
Also Joe Biden got huge amounts of money from big pharma, like he got money from the credit card industry

>>1533862
Wait until you find out the consequences for not following the rules laid out in the bible. I mean Trump and Vance are going to find out after they bring about their end times
>>1533871
>ok so our guys literally pushed through vaccines but whattabout Biden
That really was the best you could come up with huh

>>1533873
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cura_annonae
The grain dole existed during the time of Christ
Why did Jesus say give to the poor and render unto Caesar that which is Caesars if what he really meant is render unto Caesar so he can give to the poor?

>>1533873
>Wait until you find out the consequences for not following the rules laid out in the bible. I mean Trump and Vance are going to find out after they bring about their end times
I'm not particularly interested in the opinions of some random atheist.

>>1533871
If you are in the military in peak physical condition, and you refused to get vaccinated, then you very literally are not in peak physical condition, you're a giant liability that puts the health of the people around you at risk. Removing you is literally the safest option for everyone who relies on you to be part of your unit. If you voluntarily resigned from your job at the military because you chose that over getting vaccinated, then you're literally too much of a fucking moron to go be a bullet sponge for a living.
>>1533881
>I'm not particularly interested in the opinions of some random atheist.
That's really, really funny you see. Because the 'consequences for not following the rules laid out in the bible' is that you're punished infinitely for finite crimes in hellfire.
So like, someone just said "do what the bible says or you'll go to hell," and you're like "shut-up atheist!" which is about the critical thinking ability I'd expect from a religious person, yeah.
>>1533875
>Why did Jesus say give to the poor and render unto Caesar that which is Caesars
1. There's no evidence outside the bible or good reason to believe jesus existed or said anything ever.
2. "Render unto Caesar" is about roman taxation, not charity. There is a theme in the new testament of submitting to roman authority, being politically passive, and waiting for your reward in heaven. Historical mythicists, historians who don't believe in a historical jesus, have hypothesized the Jesus figure was created as a response to Jewish resistance and messianic expectations, with a version of the messiah that redirects revolutionary expectations into submission to Rome.
In other words, the passage you're quoting can be interpreted as evidence that Jesus was a written fictional character. That's why he said that. Because he was propaganda, much like he still is today.

>>1533892
>That's really, really funny you see. Because the 'consequences for not following the rules laid out in the bible' is that you're punished infinitely for finite crimes in hellfire.
>So like, someone just said "do what the bible says or you'll go to hell," and you're like "shut-up atheist!" which is about the critical thinking ability I'd expect from a religious person, yeah.
I'm not playing the game where I get held to rules you don't believe in, or understand, and where those rules are bent to conveniently align with your ideology.

>>1533892
>If you are in the military in peak physical condition, and you refused to get vaccinated, then you very literally are not in peak physical condition, you're a giant liability that puts the health of the people around you at risk. Removing you is literally the safest option for everyone who relies on you to be part of your unit. If you voluntarily resigned from your job at the military because you chose that over getting vaccinated, then you're literally too much of a fucking moron to go be a bullet sponge for a living.
Get a load of this guy inadvertently defending the Tuskegee Syphilis Study

>>1533892
>There's no evidence outside the bible or good reason to believe jesus existed or said anything ever.
This is bait.

Tacitus and Josephus both confirmed his existence. There were also these 12 guys, kind of a big deal, who confirmed his existence.

>>1533895
>Outside the bible
>There were these twelve guys
You cannot possibly be this stupid.
>Tacitus and Josephus both confirmed his existence.
All three of those references are of dubious veracity, and even if they're authentic they aren't contemporary, coming about 90 years after the supposed execution. A later author repeating Christian tradition isn't an independent witness to the events described in the faith.
>I'm not playing the game where I get held to rules you don't believe in, or understand, and where those rules are bent to conveniently align with your ideology.
If you believe in the rules, and you believe god gave you the rules, you still have to follow them if I don't believe in them. You clearly don't believe in or understand them either, they're just arbitrary to you. So why are you even talking? You're clearly too dumb to be having this conversation. You probably are somebody who needs religion, yeah, the world's fucking confusing for you huh?
>>1533894
LOL. Tuskegee wasn't unethical because public health considerations are inherently illegitimate; it was unethical because the people involved were denied informed consent and treated as means to an institutional end.
Leave it to a fucking psycho to not understand morality and need religion to have a semblance of why an idea is wrong. Fuck you lizard-brain.

>>1533905
>>Outside the bible
>>There were these twelve guys
>You cannot possibly be this stupid.
You dispute the existence of the 12 disciples, eye-witnesses to the events in question?

>All three of those references are of dubious veracity
>Tacitus
>dubious veracity
So first it was "there are no sources outside the bible" and now its "no that source doesn't count". Also, nigger, do you know who the fuck Tacitus is? I dont think you do, because if you did you certainly would not define him as "dubious".

>f you believe in the rules, and you believe god gave you the rules, you still have to follow them
Yes. I have to follow the rules, not what you say the rules are.

>>1533905
>it was unethical because the people involved were denied informed consent and treated as means to an institutional end.
Kinda like how servicemen did not have informed consent when they were forced to take an experimental mRNA vaccine, under an Emergency Use Authorization, using a whole new platform and that had undergone limited clinical testing as a means to an institutional end?

Conversational TKO.

>>1533892
There's no evidence to believe fags are human either,

>>1533750
source?

>>1533907
>You dispute the 12?
Yes. If they're eyewitnesses and wrote the gospels, why are there wild contradictions between them? If they existed, give me literally any evidence the 12 disciples existed that doesn't come from a Christian source.
>There are no sources outside the bible
A forgery isn't a source. If you want to defend forgeries as sources, sources become meaningless.
>you switched to "that source doesn't count"
Also not even close to what I said, as expected of a retard's reading comprehension. Dumbing it down for you I said the sources are likely forgeries, but even if they aren't they don't confirm the existence of jesus, they confirm the existence of christians generations after he was supposed to have existed.
>You would not define Tacitus as dubious
I didn't, I said the reference he made to jesus was a likely forgery you stupid faggot, pay attention.

>>1533908
>denied informed consent and treated as means to an institutional end
That's an incredibly broad standard for "unethical." By that logic, literally every compulsory military order is unethical if the institution benefits from it.
Tuskegee wasn't unethical because coercion or institutional interests are inherently wrong. It was unethical because the subjects were deliberately deceived about their condition, denied informed consent, and denied effective treatment so researchers could use them to study the disease.
The military vaccine mandate isn't analogous to that. Servicemembers weren't being deliberately kept ignorant of a diagnosis so researchers could observe an untreated disease, nor was an effective treatment being withheld from them for the sake of an experiment. The mandate was a force-health/readiness policy involving vaccines that had undergone clinical testing and, by the time the mandate was issued, Pfizer's vaccine had received full FDA approval. The mandate itself specified FDA-licensed vaccines, rather than requiring servicemembers to participate in clinical research.
So "they didn't have a choice and the military benefited from it" doesn't establish a Tuskegee analogy. You're going to have to establish that the relevant circumstances are actually comparable.
>Conversational TKO. I declare victory the same way I cum! Prematurely!

>>1533626
ahh yes, meanwhile trannies and male feminists who prey on kids will all be going to heaven

>>1533626
>So Vance admits trump is the anti-christ and is willingly working for him.
The anti-christ is supposed to be an extremely charismatic figure, that is universally beloved and unites the entire world under a new religion.
Trump is not the antichrist, and people who say that are biblically illiterate and ascribing far too much significance to a retarded faggot in the dark triad.
>>1533918
>ahh yes, meanwhile trannies and male feminists who prey on kids will all be going to heaven
The funny thing is, according to your religion they will if they're christian. Jesus directly says the only requirement to get into heaven is to believe in him and accept his divinity and sacrifice. You earn salvation "through faith alone" Good works don't get you into heaven. Your behavior does not matter, your salvation is dependent on you believing the narrative. That's why your morality is fucked and you're a fucking sheep. And you literally call your god a Shepard tending his flock. Shepard eat sheep, you fucking dumbass, they don't even try to hide it from you.

>>1533892
>1. There's no evidence outside the bible
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Jesus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus_on_Jesus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pliny_the_Younger_on_Christians

>>1533892
On the one hand you are saying Jesus believes everything you say
On the other hand you are saying Jesus is made up and everything he says is propaganda
Pick a lane. Either JD Vance and Trump are going to hell because Jesus is real or they're not because he isn't

>>1533963
i'm an atheist, also pretty sure people would consider unncessary body modifications and rape morally wrong. but what do i expect from a leftist politically and mentally challenged pig, I genuinely wish trump was the nazi you all make him out to be because when you die the world will be better off.

>>1534042
I love how you guys say openly evil and irredeemable shit like this and still pretend to be on some kind of moral high horse cuz
>What about Hasan
You’re gonna be reminded everyday how that boot tasted when Dear Leader isn’t around anymore

>>1534175
you're political party has educators who've spoken for the last decade saying its fine to assault students who don't vote democrat. I'd say look in the mirror but you'd just see yourself as a saint in every way imaginable even if you were the most vile person on earth. People are done with you, you should just hurry up and kill yourself that's the best thing you can do for the world.

>>1534042
>I'm an atheist

Good thing you let that be known immediately so I can ignore the rest of your post

>>1534196
>reddit spacing
subhumans like you deserve the rope

>>1533811
No it's a belief, but not the pregnant men thing. That's only for mostly pedos despite priests wanting to molest children, that's another story.

DERP HERPEPREREHERP