https://www.city-journal.org/article/san-francisco-taxpayer-funded-houses-sex-offendersIt’s Tuesday morning at Little Learners Daycare in downtown San Francisco. Teacher Wendy herds bright-eyed toddlers, amped up after playtime in the courtyard, back inside. They’re laughing and swatting at each other playfully, oblivious to the pack of pedophiles lurking nearby.Four hundred feet away, dozens of registered sex offenders live at 111 Taylor Street. Wendy knew that the Tenderloin, where she operates her Mandarin-immersion daycare, was dangerous. It’s a hotbed for illegal drug activity and homelessness. But she didn’t realize that sex offenders live so close to her daycare—or that taxpayers fund their housing.According to this City Journal investigation, more than 25 percent of sex offenders in San Francisco with addresses in the Megan’s Law database live in taxpayer-subsidized buildings. Many live near a park, school, or daycare, or reside in a neighborhood with a high concentration of children. They do all of this despite statewide efforts to ban concentrating pedophiles so close to children. Instead of listening to California voters, San Francisco has become a taxpayer-funded dumping ground for sex criminals.The Taylor Street Center is one of San Francisco’s most heavily populated sex-offender residences. Located in the Tenderloin, Taylor Street houses at least 31 registered sex offenders. The taxpayer-funded California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the federal Bureau of Prisons contract the private GEO Group to run the facility.The reentry complex can house 240 people. It hosts specialized programs for residents like “cultural diversity education,” “gender-responsive groups,” and a “weekly meditation group.” The facility sits just 400 feet from a daycare center, 1,000 feet from a fourth-to-eighth-grade school, and five blocks away from a preschool.The neighborhood also has the highest concentration of kids in the entire city.
We spoke with one man, Paul, as he walked to an appointment in the neighborhood. Paul told us that he served time for a sex-related offense, had to register as a sex offender, and now lives at the Taylor Street house. In his opinion, there’s overblown “hysteria” around sex offenders’ proximity to children.“For me, seeing a minor is like walking in the Tenderloin late at night,” he said. “Like, ‘stay away from that person.’”Some of Paul’s neighbors seem less scrupulous. Multiple residents at 111 Taylor Street are “in violation” of their sex-offender-registration requirements, according to the state’s public database. At least one has been accused of sexually deviant behavior during his time at the Taylor house: Kevin Adams, a 37-year-old convicted in 2014 of transmitting more than 600 images of child pornography, including some that were sadistic or masochistic in nature.Adams was released from prison on supervised release after his conviction. While on supervised release, he conducted multiple lewd internet searches, like “Asian Teens; Teen Cum Shot; and Teen Pussy.” He also searched online for pornographic content of gymnastic videos with young girls. Despite his conduct, Adams was relocated to Taylor Street, where he continued to exhibit “increased sexual deviance related to minors”—including viewing material on social media that depicted minors in various postures, from stretching to kneeling without pants.As of 2026, Adams was a threat to the community and had a “clear sexual preoccupation with minors,” his probation officer determined. A court revoked his release in September after he admitted to possessing pornography. Adams’s listed address on the sex-offender registry is still 111 Taylor Street.
One of Adams’s neighbors at the Taylor Street center is Michael Eugene Kincade. One night in 2008, after his family had gone to sleep, Kincade went downstairs and molested a 13-year-old girl sleeping on his couch. She cried and told him to stop. He didn’t, according to court documents. Kincade has a history of alleged sexual misconduct; in 2000, he allegedly fondled an 18-year-old in her sleep before grabbing her, forcing her face into a cushion, choking her, and raping her. He did not respond to a comment request.Neighbors have no idea that the apartment complex on the corner of Taylor Street is crawling with sex offenders. “I would assume the city pushes them over here because it’s a lower income living area [with] subsidized housing,” Steven, a San Francisco resident for 23 years, told us. “People can come over here, get free housing, use drugs, and get food stamps, and not have any repercussions in life.”But the pedophile houses are not restricted to low-income areas like the Tenderloin. Offenders live in subsidized housing across San Francisco. An extensive review of the public registry found that more than 25 percent of sex offenders with addresses on the Megan’s Law website live in taxpayer-funded buildings.As of September 25, 779 registered sex offenders live in San Francisco and are listed in the state’s Megan’s Law database. Of the 628 such offenders with an address, 158 live in 65 taxpayer-funded buildings throughout the city.The buildings operate on various models. 111 Taylor, for example, is run by a private contractor. Others, like the Mission Hotel, are permanent supportive housing hotels run by a nonprofit, and funded by the city of San Francisco’s Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (DHSH). At least five sex offenders live at the Mission Hotel—a property less than two blocks away from the Petite Explorer Preschool.
Are you surprised? The party that shields Joe Briben the child gang rapist funds pedophiles. Who didn't see that coming?
>>1540513>funds pedophilesBro, it's a reentry facility. This is like bitching about prisons being free housing for criminals.
>>1540521Anything to deflect from trump's continued cover up of the epstein list and having his goons who control the FBI personally censor his name and involvement with Epstein. Interesting how our local shill didn't use the NYslop for his recent thread spree.
>>1540523For 4 years Biden released 0 Epstein files and not once did you blame one of Biden's policy decisions on his continued coverup of the Epstein files. Trump release 3.5 million Epstein files and you call everything he does an Epstein cover up, calling it Epsteins War, Epsteins whitehouse. It's unhinged
>>1540524This was already debunked in many other threads ELS-shill.The investigation was still ongoing so Biden couldn't release any files. trump then refused to release them which had congress pass H.R.4405 - Epstein Files Transparency Act, which trump resisted and ultimately never fully enforced since he's still covering up files, specifically that mention his name.
>>1540524Biden didn't run on releasing the files. Trump did, and now he's not doing so. Biden didn't have a law requiring him to release all the files, unredacted. Trump does, and he's breaking the law by not doing so.
>>1540509ACAB. Defund the police.
>>1540525And that was debunked in prior threads as well. Epstein was dead in 2019, there was no more investigation into him, and investigations into his associates wouldn't preclude documents from being released.No, there is no strong historical precedent for keeping high-profile criminal investigation files entirely sealed for years solely because of prosecutions against associates, in the way sometimes claimed for the Epstein files. Standard legal practices involve targeted protections (e.g., grand jury secrecy, victim privacy, ongoing investigation risks, or appeals), but not blanket, multi-year sealing of entire case files during associate prosecutions.Historical Precedents: Capone and GottiAl Capone (tax evasion conviction 1931):His prosecution focused on taxes, not the full organized crime network. Extensive records (raids, ledgers, witness statements) were used at trial and became public. No multi-year blanket seal on "Capone files" while chasing associates.Grand jury testimony and some evidence had standard protections, but core trial documents and IRS/FBI materials were accessible post-trial. Capone's downfall generated massive public records without long-term sealing tied to co-conspirators.John Gotti (convicted 1992):Racketeering/murder case relied heavily on Sammy Gravano's testimony. Trial evidence (tapes, surveillance) entered the public record. No evidence of entire investigative files sealed for years due to other Gambino prosecutions.Post-conviction appeals and related mob cases proceeded with normal disclosures. FBI files later became available via FOIA/Vault releases. High-profile organized crime cases often see significant public exposure at trial.In both cases, selective sealing (e.g., protecting cooperators, grand jury info, or fugitives) was common, but not a years-long embargo on core files. High-profile prosecutions typically generate public trials and records to demonstrate justice.
>>1540525Maybe there's still an investigation ongoing?Lots of Virgin Island and New Mexico Democrats are in those files.
>1540528>1540529Looks like the bot broke again./pol/ never sends their best to /news/, Very insulting honestly.
>>1540530How does calling me a broken bot refute the lack of historical precedent in sealing the files of high profile criminals while their associates were prosecuted?
>>1540530Oh lawd, now we're on the /pol shit? Why not just shitpost on /pol/? All the other faggots do.
>>1540509>>1540510>>1540511This is literally what San Francisco and California voted for.
>>1540534>>1540532>Hit dog hollers
Has anybody her actually ever seen any CP? Of course not but if you had you would know that the majority of it is all known it's not like there's new sources of it popping up. That's because a lot of it has watermarks from being an FBI case. so if it has FBI property marks on it guess who's distributing it in order to entrap people. There's an NGO out of Austin Texas that gets funded by the FBI they create torrents with mislabeled names things like "hot celebrity check this out" here's a few examples that where on my DHT server before I created filters to try to automatically remove it. "Kim Kardashian hot video" "Katherine McNamara hot pics". The only way to filter them out of the DHT server is to look at sizes and where they're coming from it's a constant non-stop battle they daily inject hundreds of these things the IP always comes from that NGO in Austin Texas and if you look it up it's all a bunch of super liberal Democrats running the place. Why are there Democrats running the place? because they need people with questionable moral values. They're paying what everyone in the federal court system refers to as "child pornstars" several cases where victims found their stuff online sued the FBI won and they made a deal to make them rich by paying restitution funded by entrapped SO to them for the rest of their life. therefore they are paid for their underage pornographic videos. The Republicans created the laws to do all this and then they just handed it to Democrats to run and everyone is profiting quite a bit from the restitution and then they put these guys into Federal treatment programs that are ran by democrats to brainwash these guys into thinking that they're bad human beings when really they just stumbled upon something and it was so shocking they had an existential crisis and felt guilty about it. It's all about money and keeping agent's jobs while making an appear like they're doing something about the pedophilia issue that the elites have.
>>1540551Which is why every time I bring up Joe Bidens lack of release of Epstein files you come with one cope or another about how the investigation was ongoing into one of his associates. When that has never stopped high profile criminal cases like Gotti, Capone, or the Manson family. You're making up a precedent which has no prior cases, and then when I point this out you give up arguing and start calling me a Russian or esl shill
>>1540573>whenever I bring up irrelevant lies and esl propaganda, you accuse me of being a foreign shillYep, because you are that retarded.
>>1540577It's not a lie, the Gotti files and Capone files were not suppressed while associated were being prosecuted. It's not irrelevant as they are both high profile criminals which put them in the same category as Epstein, and there's no government agency out there putting out propaganda about the Gotti Files & Capone files.
>>1540551What?
>>1540573>Which is why every time I make a tired ass whataboutism. . . .Let's say for the sake of argument Joe Biden is a pedophile, and has a vested interest in protecting powerful pedophiles.Explain to me how that mean Trump isn't a pedophile protecting powerful pedophile.>It doesn't.Cool.Now if you wanted someone to release files that might implicate them as a pedophile, who is more trustworthy; someone who does not release them at all and gives a good reason for not releasing them, or someone who releases part of them, and deliberately lies to you, telling you they released all of them, you totally don't need to look into it further, trust them?>The guy who lied about releasing all of them even though he didn't obviously has something to hide.And what would be a valid reason for the other guy not releasing them/>It might jeopardize an ongoing investigation.Ah, cool, so you already know and you're still arguing against it. So what you're telling me is that you're a retarded, disingenuous faggot, repeating moronic arguments that have been long since BTFO.>yeahSeriously, you should consider killing yourself, you'd make life so much better for everyone who knows you.
>>1540746>someone who does not release them at all and gives a good reason for not releasing them,What was that good reason?>>1540528
