[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/news/ - Current News

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


🎉 Happy Birthday 4chan! 🎉


[Advertise on 4chan]


Trump calls Cornell ‘a fine school’ as he breaks silence on alleged gang rape case
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-cornell-university-investigation-b3059992.html
President Donald Trump has weighed in on the alleged gang rape of an ex-Cornell University student who claims she was abused for hours by members of a fraternity at a house party two years ago. The young woman, identified as Jane Doe, is suing Cornell and the seven members of the Ivy League school’s Chi Phi fraternity house, alleging that she was pressured into taking ketamine and sexually assaulted for hours on October 19, 2024, at the house party in Ithaca, New York. She was 20 years old at the time. The president was asked Thursday by a reporter whether the university had “done enough to investigate” the alleged sexual abuse after the institution came under fire for its response following Doe’s bombshell lawsuit, filed last week. “Well, I don't know that much about it,” Trump began. “But Cornell's a fine school, and I'm sure they'll do what's right.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZN7vm9mIPBs HARLOTTSVILLE
>>
>>1540890
Say, ALLCAPS ULTRA GAY TROONER, I can't believe he said the following:
>“Well, I don't know that much about it,” Trump began. “But Cornell's a fine school, and I'm sure they'll do what's right.”
It has me seething!
>>
Any nudes? (of the girl not tRump)
>>
>>1540899
I'd probably ask on /b.
>>
So not only are neo nazis very fine people to trump, but so are rapists.
On brand given he is one too.
>>
>>1540917
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/
Fact check:False
Trump never called neonazis very fine people. That has been debunked by Snopes.
>>
>>1540917
Stinky
>>
>duke lacrosse 2.0
>>
>>1540917
of course Trump loves pedophiles and rapists, he loves himself
>>
>>1540922
>Actually believing this.
We all saw the video of him calling them very fine people.
>>
1 Timothy 8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully; 9 knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 for whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine.
>>
>>1540890
education is controlled by leftists so not too surprising. democrats love to self-report
>>
>>1541072
>retard calls snopes fake news
>suffering from mass psychosis
typical democrat retard always out of touch with reality.
>>
>>1541076
>Appeal to authority
Trump still said neo nazis were fine people
>>
>>1541077
Most nazis are fine people. That's why leftists hate them.
>>
>>1541077
>Hey look everyone, I'm stinky posting!!
Stinky
>>
>>1541078
So you admit trump called them fine people.
Accepted
>>
>>1541072
The clip where he says "and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?"
The one included in the snopes article fact checking Trumps statement?
>>
>>1541081
>I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally
MOM~! Stinky is stinky posting again!
Da fuq you do this for?
>>
>>1541077
snopes is the authority? lol talk about being a bigot
>>
>>1541084
Enough of your trollshit, faggit. Get banned again.
>>
>>1541082
But that's a contradiction, since it was just neo nazis and white supremacists, if you weren't a counter-protestor, that got attacked. By your logic, he's condemning them and calling them fine people.
>>
>>1541086
How do you know it was just neo nazis and white supremacists?
>>
>>1541082
>But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?"
Except there weren't, because it was a literal neo-nazis rally.
>>
>>1541087
Tiki torches are a white supremacist dogwhistle.
>>
>>1541088
So we're at the point where "Trump should've known"?
Just staaaahp.
>>
>>1541087
Who shows up to a rally for neo nazis and white supremacists that shout "jews will not replace us!"
>>
>>1541088
But it wasn't a neo-nazi rally.
There were people protesting saying confederate statues should be taken down, and other people protesting saying confederate statues should stay up.
There were very fine people on both sides of the confederate statue issue.
>>
>>1541092
Who shows up a rally for anti-semites that shout "From the river to the sea Palestine will be Muslim/Arab" who's not a nazi?
A lot of democrats apparently
>>
>>1541090
"Dogwhistles" are ways to attack people for things they didn't say.
Someone said X but they really mean Y, and only bad people think Y so how can you support someone?
>>
>>1541094
>Confirming it was it was all neo nazis and white supremacists because you can't refute it and are desperately trying to change the subject
concession accepted
>>
>>1541102
What is the difference between muslims saying they will replace Jews from the jordan river to the mediterranean sea, so that Palestine is completely islamic and arab, and white people in america saying they won't be replaced by Jews?
>>
>>1541088
>Except there weren't, because it was a literal neo-nazis rally.
Except that's wrong you fucking retard. You had several people there who weren't affiliated with any neo-nazis who were against the removal of the statues for historic reason.
>in before another hurr y have satues fur traitors durr deflection
>>
>>1541103
>Still trying to change the subject since he can't refute that a rally run by neo nazis and white supremacists had nothing but neo nazis and white supremacists attending.
Must be "very fine people" like trump calls neo nazis and white supremacists.
>>
>>1541086
It was just neo-nazis
>>1541088
It was a literal neo-nazi rally
>>1541092
it was a rally for neo-nazis and white supremacists
>>1541105
it was a rally run by neo-nazis and white supremacists
>>1541102
>confirming it was all neo-nazis and white supremacists
I haven't confirmed shit, you just repeat it over and over again, as if you repeat it enough times the only people who disagree with you are nazis.
I can't refute something you have never proven. repeating yourself over and over again they were all neo-nazis and white supremacists is not providing proof
>>
>>1541106
>Jews will not replace us
>"Jews will not replace us" is a white supremacist and antisemitic chant based on a false conspiracy theory that Jewish people are plotting to destroy the white race by promoting immigration and multiculturalism
I'm just sticking to the facts and truth, as you try to do everything to deflect from them.
>>
>>1541109
And the claim that Gaza is a genocide is an Islamosupremacist and antisemitic chant based on the false conspiracy theory that Jewish people are plotting to destroy Palestine and the Palestinian people through deliberately killing civilians and committing war crimes.
>>
>>1541111
>Instantly goes back to deflecting when presented with irrefutable proof.
Concession accepted
>>
>>1541109
Are you going to provide any evidence that it was all neo-nazis and white supremacists or are you just going to repeat it over again like the repitition itself is the proof, and I need to refute your repetition. If repetition instead of proof satisfies you, let me repeat myself
>>1541086
It was NOT just neo-nazis
>>1541088
It was NOT a literal neo-nazi rally
>>1541092
it was NOT a rally for neo-nazis and white supremacists
>>1541105
it was NOT a rally run by neo-nazis and white supremacists
There you go. There's your refutation
>>
>>1541109
Where is the irrefutable proof that they were neo-nazis?
I am looking through this post from top to bottom looking for irrefutable proof that everyone at Charlottesville was a neo-nazi and white supremacist but I can't find it
>>
>>1541109
>false conspiracy theory
They literally admit it's real and that it's a good thing.
>>
>>1541113
>>1541114
>>1541115
>/pol/ can't even keep their talking points in order
So what is it? Are they not neo-nazis, "jews wll not replace us" isn't real. Or it is real?
>>
>>1541116
WHERE IS THE FUCKING EVIDENCE THEY ARE ALL NEO NAZIS AND WHITE SUPREMACISTS STOP DEFLECTING
>>
>>1541116
>blaming jews as a collective is a bad thing!
>also did you know that everybody at the Unite the Right rally was a white supremacist?
Can't make this shit up.
>>
>>1541104
>Except that's wrong you fucking retard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unite_the_Right_rally
The Unite the Right rally was a white supremacist rally that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia, from August 11 to 12, 2017. Marchers included members of the alt-right, neo-Confederates, neo-fascists, white nationalists, white supremacists, neo-Nazis, Klansmen, and far-right militias.
But do tell us more about the rally organized by neo-nazis not being full of neo-nazis.
>>
>they were all white supremacists because a publicly edited database of leftist opinions said so!
It keeps getting funnier.
>>
>>1541118
>>1541119
>Does a march with tiki torch where everyone in the march is chanting "Jews will not replace us!"
>This does not count as evidence now.
The absolute state of /pol/'s latest incursion into /news/
Also a reminder that the makers of tiki torches were more forceful in the condemnation of neo nazis and white supremacists than trump.
>>
>>1541120
Okay, do we know that the unite the right rally is what Trump was talking about?
When he said there was plenty of fine people on both sides, was he talking about
1. The Unite the Right Rally Marchers and the Antifa Protestors
or
2. The Confederate Statue issue, with people wanting the statues removed or to remain
>>
>>1541124
IF YOU HAVE VIDEO OF EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN THAT MARCH CHANTING JEWS WILL NOT REPLACE US FUCKING POST IT
PROVE IT
>>
>>1541124
Is everybody in the crowd guilty of the same moral crime, or are they individuals responsible for their own actions?

Choose wisely.
>>
>>1541125
>Okay, do we know that the unite the right rally is what Trump was talking about?
Yes. Now hurry up and kill yourself, your parents are waiting. They want the shame to end.
>>
>>1541126
>>1541127
>Moving the goalposts
I'll humor you here.
So if everyone else you're with is chanting "jews will not replace us" You think it's fine to still show up and you won't be implicated with them?
Honest question.
>>
>>1541129
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/
Well you'll have to take it up with Snopes because they fact checked the context and said Trump was actually saying there was very fine people on both sides of the confederate statue issue, and that was established by Trump clarifying "and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?"
>>
>>1541131
You're talking to shills who operate in total bad faith.
>>
>>1541131
>https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/
>Editors' Note: Some readers have raised the objection that this fact check appears to assume Trump was correct in stating that there were "very fine people on both sides" of the Charlottesville incident. That is not the case. This fact check aimed to confirm what Trump actually said, not whether what he said was true or false. For the record, virtually every source that covered the Unite the Right debacle concluded that it was conceived of, led by and attended by white supremacists, and that therefore Trump's characterization was wrong.
You didn't even read your own link, did you? You Eric Schmitt-level moron.
>>
>>1541130
STOP DEFLECTING AND POST THE FUCKING PROOF SO I CAN REFUTE IT. STOP DEFLECTING WITH WHAT IFS
>>
>>1541134
>he didnt say neonazis were very good people
>but we need to keep spinning this
>>
>>1541138
>>but we need to keep spinning this
>For the record, virtually every source that covered the Unite the Right debacle concluded that it was conceived of, led by and attended by white supremacists, and that therefore Trump's characterization was wrong.
You didn't even read your own link, did you? You Eric Schmitt-level moron.
>>
>>1541137
Answer the simple the question, if you went to a protest where everyone else on your side was shouting "Jews will not replace us" do you honestly think reasonable people would not implicate you with the rest of your group?
>>
>>1541132
See what I said about them operating in bad faith>>1541140
>>
>>1541130
>You think it's fine to still show up and you won't be implicated with them?
Why would someone be implicated if there was no proof of them actually doing it?
You're unironically arguing that collective guilt is fine so long as it applies to white people.
>>
>>1541134
>This fact check aimed to confirm what Trump actually said, not whether what he said was true or false.
So they said it was false that Trump said there was very fine people on both sides of the Charlottesville incident, which is why they rated the statement as false.
Trump said there was very fine people on both sides of the confederate statue issue, which is what Snopes establishes as Trumps words
>>
>>1541141
I will answer your question
I don't believe you. I don't think such a scenario ever happened so I don't think anyone has to deal with that hypothetical
>>
>>1541142
>See what I said about them operating in bad faith
>"The rally organized by neo-nazis was not a neo-nazi rally!"
>"Also, everyone else is operating in bad faith! Not me!"
Every accusation is an admission with these idiots. Every single time.
>>
>>1541146
>>See what I said about them operating in bad faith
Yes.

You initially said that Trump called neo-nazis "very fine people". This is untrue, per Snopes, because he was referring to the Confederate Statue issue.

You're now trying to argue about the attendees at the rally. Which is irrelevant. You're conflating the two issues because you're operating in bad faith.
>>
>>1541143
>>1541145
So now your argument is
>It didn't actually happen
The footage disagrees. But given trump defended them as very fine people, of course you will go 1984 on us.
>>
>>1541149
>But given trump defended them as very fine people,
He didn't. He expressly disavowed them.

Why are you still arguing about this when everyone knows exactly what he said and who he said it about?
>>
>>1541150
>>1541150
>Very fine people, on both sides!
>both sides
Clearly he lied about condemning them. But trump likes to lie, a lot.
>>
>>1541151
Why are you still arguing about this when the fact-check is right there? Whats the point? Is this a false-flag to make liberals look cultish and retarded?
>>
>>1541153
They think they're trolling you.
>>
>>1541153
>Why argue against a clearly flawed fact check?
You answered your own question.
Also before you switch to another line of damage control, it's not trolling if it's true.
>>
>>1541157
Its either trolling or you're a deeply disturbed individual.
>>
>>1541151
Both sides of what?
>>
>>1541149
What footage? What are you talking about? I didn't see anyone post footage here. There's nothing to refute there's no there there
>>
>>1541160
He's talking about the footage everyone knows but nobody can post *for some reason*
>>
>>1541158
>Scrapping at the bottom of the barrel with ad hominems now.
Now you're just being rude, even after I've been respectful to you this entire time. But I will not take your bait and stick with the confirmed fact.

>>1541159
>>1541160
>Sealioning now
At least this is one step above ad hominems.
>>
>>1541162
>Now you're just being rude
Nope, not rude at all. We have the transcript of what he said, we have the fact check. If, despite all that, you still refuse to accept reality you're either trolling or mentally ill.
>>
>>1541167
but they could also be both, and they could also be genuinely that retarded
and if they're really that retarded, then you're kinda retarded for arguing with them so long
>>
>>1541149
>So now your argument is-
It's okay to admit you were wrong anon. This is 4chan. Nobody will give a fuck.
>>
>>1541147
>You initially said that Trump called neo-nazis "very fine people".
Yeah that wasn't me though. I'm the guy proving you're a complete moron for claiming the rally organized by neo-nazis was not a neo-nazi rally.
>>
>>1541171
>you're a complete moron for claiming the rally organized by neo-nazis was not a neo-nazi rally.
Congratulations on winning an argument no one was having.
>>
>>1541167
>>1541170
>Now pivoting the gaslighting
Anything to avoid admitting trump called neo-nazis 'very fine people' eh?
>>
>>1541162
You haven't presented any proof. The "other side" has presented a snopes article with a transcript . While you have proven yourself to use repetition in the place of evidence
>>1541106
Until you post some actual proof instead of repeating yourself over and over in place of proof I'm not going to believe you, I am going to think you are someone with no evidence, that can browbeat people into compliance without proof through pure repetition
>>
>>1541173
>trump called neo-nazis 'very fine people' eh?
As I said, total and complete bad faith. You have your shill-lines and you're going to stick to them, even if its an ancient issue thats long been resolved.
>>
>>1541087
>>1541093
>>1541172
>>1541104
>Congratulations on winning an argument no one was having.
Congratulations on living with down syndrome.
>>
>>1541183
>Congratulations on living with down syndrome.
You lost an argument to someone with down syndrome?
>>
>>1541175
>>1541177
Interesting you're taking this tact when you have already been forced to admit it was rally organized by neo-nazis >>1541172
>>
>>1541184
>You lost an argument to someone with down syndrome?
Your mom clearly lost an argument against aborting you and she regrets it every day since.
>>
>>1541186
>He was talking about the confederate statue issue
>b....but the rally
>he was talking about the confederate statute issue
>>b....but the rally
Bad faith. Just total bad faith.

>>1541187
>mad
>>
>>1541188
>Strawman
If Neo nazis set up a rally, you don't go to that one, just make your own.
Or better yet, if you still go and see a bunch of people with tiki torches chanting "Jews will not replace us!" if you aren't a neo-nazi yourself, you'd go home and not stay there.
>>
>>1541191
>b... but the rally
lmao.
>>
>>1541191
why are you trying so hard to convince esl shill?
they're a retarded pedophile
>>
>>1541192
Yes, it's about the rally, and trump calling neo nazis 'very fine people'. Do you really think people are going to fall for your deflection?
Looping back to the OP, trump does like to call awful things 'fine'
>>
>>1541188
>"It wasn't a neo-nazi rally!"
>"Huh? I never said anything about the rally!"
You seem butthurt.
>>
>>1541191
Okay what if you're going to protest Confederate statues going down and then 3 days later a bunch of Nazis show up. Would that make you a Nazi?
>>
>>1541201
Nice strawman attempt, but we're talking about the rally the neo nazis organized. You know the one where they changed "Jews will not replace us" and trump called them 'very fine people'? That one.
>>
>>1541202
Okay, but was that unite the right rally what Trump was talking about?
Because Snopes was saying he wasn't talking about that
>>
>>1541203
Which specfic rally with neo nazis was he talking about then if it wasn't Charlottesville?
>>
>>1541206
Well when Trump said "and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?"
It seems to imply there is a group without neo-nazis and white nationalists, and that was the people he was saying were very fine people.
https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/reuters-ipsos-confederate-monuments-2017-08-22
>The Reuters/Ipsos poll on Confederate monuments is now available. Over half of Americans (54%) believe Confederate monuments should remain in all public spaces, while only a quarter (27%) think they should be removed. A plurality of Americans most associate heritage (40%) with these monuments, distantly followed by racism (23%).
54% of Americans believe that confederate monuments should remain in public places. Maybe that was the group of very fine people he was talking about
>>
>>1541207
No, the group without neo-nazis and white nationalists were the liberals, one of which was killed by your nazi buddies.
Got any more 10 year old polls to back up your dementia?
>>
>>1541207
>But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay?
Who shows up to a rally organized by neo nazis who are chanting "Jews will not replace us"?
>>
>>1541209
They wouldn't, because he wasn't talking about that rally, and he wasn't talking about those people. Which is why he was talking about people in the confederate statue issue other than the neo-nazis and white nationalists, okay?
>>
>if I say it enough it may eventually be true
>>
>>1541210
>because he wasn't talking about that rally, and he wasn't talking about those people.
Proof next thread?
>>
>>1541212
Why can't we get the guy to post proof this thread.
He's been asked 50 times to provide the footage he said would prove him right but he never does
>>
>>1540890
>“Well, I don't know that much about it,” Trump began. “But Cornell's a fine school, and I'm sure they'll do what's right.”
OH MY GOD WHAT A SICK FUCK HOLY SHIT THIS IS LITERALLY HITLER TALKING WHAT KIND OF PSYCHOPATH WOULD SUPPORT A UNIVERSITY THAT CREATES GANGRAPE!!!
>>
>>1541213
Because he's trolling.
>>
>"t-rump"
welcome back from your ban, vlad.
>>
He said Cornell is a fine school and that they'd handle the issue responsibly. He didn't say the rapists were fine people. Pure fake news. Liggerals are so fucking stupid. And another thing, you ought to miss the days of "restrained 2016 Trump" who still tried to act diplomatic towards you traitors. He literally said "very fine people" ON BOTH SIDES. INCLUDING THE LIGGERALS. He literally tried to offer an olive branch to the liggeral confederate monument defilers and YOU slapped it out of his hand. After we win the midterms (and we will win the midterms. Mark my words. The MSM clearly seems to believe the Dems have a landslide victory coming and we already know the MSM is wrong about EVERYTHING) you are going to sincerely wish you had nice Trump back over the God of Vengeance that we currently have sitting in the Oval Office. Hes coming for you. You can't stop him.
>>
>>1541242
>He's not a rapist!
>He's coming for you, you can't stop him.
Checks out.
>Liggeral confederate monument defiler.
Wow, that also checks out. Confederates are stupid seditious losers, they don't deserve monuments. Most of the monuments people have pushed back against were not created after the civil war, most are fairly recent additions, placed in black communities that wouldn't celebrate the people that fought to keep them in chains, by white lawmakers that seem to pine for those times like you. Put them in a racist museum.
>Nice trump
You mean the trump that rapes teenage girls with the most famous sex trafficker in the world, his BFF?
Yeah, it was nice before he was so openly corrupt enriching himself and his ugly retarded children by multiple billions. Yep, that showed liberals only, you definitely aren't the condom he's using to fuck everyone else you fucking dipshit.
>Didn't say the rapists were fine people.
No, he condemns THESE rapists, he only hangs out with and covers for OTHER rapists!
>We will win the midterms.
You're going to lose TEXAS you stupid faggot. That's how bad you fucked up. You gerrymandered on of the most important states in the union to a right-wing hellscape and it's still turning blue like your mom around my dick.
>>
>>1541244
>You're going to lose TEXAS

Ahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaa
>>
>>1541244
>You're going to lose TEXAS you stupid faggot.
Anon... Texas hasn't voted for a democrat since Carter in the 70s. Are you out of your fucking mind?
>>
>>1541269
Liggerals believe the MSMS. What ever the MSM says, they clap like seals and nod their heads like good little NPCs. They don't realize, somehow, that the corporate backed MSM only exists to fuel TDS. These people really do think they're going to win some landslide victory because the MSM told them so. Pure delusion. Texas. Going blue. I'm serious. LMAO
>>
>>1541270
They're right you know.
>>
>>1541270
>TDS
We get it, you're a pedophile, who defends the trump pedo class, no need to reinforce it with all your other rambling.

>>1541269
It correct term is 'democratic' you look ESL by using the wrong part of speech.
>>
>>1541295
They could be only if there's s huge number of idiots willing to vote Democrat.
After that Biden disaster who knows if the attempt to blame shift the 'affordability crisis' on to dRumpf will take.
>>
>>1541269
Ann Richards was the democratic governor of Texas for most of the nineties.

I'm begging you fucking retards to learn the bare minimum of history instead of just guessing at everything.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.