>>1542004
Amazing that this woman can ruin 7 men's lives and stay anonymous, because she regretted having sex and doing drugs with 3 of them.

>>1542083
Amazing how the men in your story don't have to have their lives ruined for doing drugs and gang-banging a semi-willing slut.
That's funny because I did lots of drugs in college, and I didn't rape anyone, so your insinuation the drugs are to blame are bullshit, and it sounds an awful lot like these rapists ruined their own lives.
I mean would you fuck an incoherent woman who is clearly impaired beyond consent and has 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 other guy's cum leaking out of her?
And since rapists facing no consequences is a right-wing talking point, I'll just assume you threw up in your mouth a little at the thought of sex with a woman.
Eat shit and die, narrow-minded faggot.

>>1542100
Holy bot response Batman.

>>1542101
Not a bot, nice cope bitch.

>>1542100
TRVKE

>>1542100
>clearly impaired beyond consent
So were the guys she had sex with. Were they the victims of rape too?
Jane Doe has a higher 'rape' count than any one of those individual men.

>>1542144
if it was 7 girls on 1 guy you would say hes a victim too, because they would REQUIRE him to cum for each one, thats 7 times in one night, no 1 dick built for that, thats torture

>>1542148
>REQUIRE him to cum
Anon doesn't understand what rape is, apparently.

>>1542148
>no 1 dick built for that, thats torture
I don't get any post orgasm pain until I've cum 8-10 times. Not sure what your problem is. My record is 30 times across 10 hours/33 times in 24 hours.

>>1542149
Never met a girl so horny she’ll straight up tell you “fuck me every day or I’m finding someone who will” and suddenly you’re the most motivated man alive.

>>1542144
>>clearly impaired beyond consent
>So were the guys she had sex with. Were they the victims of rape too?
>Jane Doe has a higher 'rape' count than any one of those individual men.
No you fucking dipshit, being drunk or high does not inherently make you a rape victim. There IS obviously a level of intoxication where you're too fucked up to consent or make good choices, which is why we have laws against over-serving people. I know it's hard for morons to understand nuance, but try to keep up.
I'm not even necessarily saying she was raped because she was on drugs, (she was raped because she consented to the first two, not the next five)I'm saying if I'm the fourth guy on the scene and there's a strung-out girl leaking three other guys' cum, I have the common sense to think, “Oh, this is not safe for her or me,” and leave. I don't need a fucking law degree to recognize that this is a situation I should stay the hell away from.
These people are scum-fucks. I'm not even kink-shaming them; I don't give a shit about their drug use. They're just socially retarded. Their self-preservation is weak. They're willing to take stupid risks for short-term pleasure at someone else's expense. They don't deserve your sympathy. They ruined their own lives and shouldn't be part of society. Is that why you empathize with them?

>>1542164
>No you fucking dipshit, being drunk or high does not inherently make you a rape victim.
That's the argument being made by Jane Doe. She was purportedly snorting Ketamine off the dicks of these guys, and the guys in question were high on ketamine too.
Ketamine fucks with your memory in a serious way.
>Is that why you empathize with them?
I think it's bad to deny women any and all responsibility for their own actions.

>>1542165
>That's the Argument being made by Jane Doe.
It isn't though. Her argument is that she consented to sex with two people, and they kept calling more and kept going after she asked them to stop. You're just stating facts about the case that make her look slutty. Fine she's slut that got repeatedly raped by 7 guys.
>I think it's bad to deny women any and all responsibility for their own actions.
I think you can think that she's also probably morally bankrupt, and made some bad decision given the circumstances.
I think getting raped is the extent of the consequences of her actions that she should face, that she's faced them, and now the people who raped her need to have consequences. Arguing that she's had no consequences is fucking insane, and implies you don't consider rape a negative. Checks out.

>>1542168
>Consensual sex you later regret
>Rape

>>1542170
Meaning you're not even good enough for women to let you 'rape' them.

>>1542175
Your response is incomprehensible. Clearly and obviously you're posting from the third world.

>>1542168
>It isn't though.
It literally is. It's also being used as a defense by the lads accused of rape, because again, Ketamine.
>I think you can think that she's also probably morally bankrupt
She only accused them of rape after they refused to invite her to a party because she kept doing weird shit.

>>1542100
>semi-willing slut
Funny way of saying she has consensual sex, aka was not raped.

>>1542168
Her current claims are undercut by her sworn and signed statement in 2024 saying that everything is consensual. You retards are trying to say that women are incapable of making serious statements, and that everything they say cannot be trusted because they're too stupid to get the facts right. No, she signed her name swearing everything was consensual.

>>1542189
>It literally is. It's also being used as a defense by the rapists, because again, Ketamine.
It literally isn't, her defense is literally that she consented to 2, but they kept bringing more closeted rapists and didn't stop when she said she wanted to.
>The strung out bitch they fucked lied because the wouldn't invite her to a party!
Gee, maybe they shouldn't rape strung-out junkies and do ketamine at an Ivy League school.
>>1542198
That's undercut by what she told police in the police report, which is that she consented to sex with 2 of the seven people who raped her.
>>1542197
That's a funny way of saying you're such a retard you don't understand consent.

https://www.tmz.com/2026/10/08/cornell-jane-doe-texts-about-alleged-assault/

>>1542204
In light of new info, yeah, that looks bad, she's a manipulative cunt, and hell has a special place for women who lie about rape accusations.
I'm willing to admit I was wrong here, and thank you for posting that to keep me humble.
Half of you are still pieces of human garbage arguing in bad faith, you're claiming she changed her mind in a middle, and it's impossible to withdraw consent in the middle of sex, (which isn't rape if you stop when you're told to) which is incel ideology I wanted push back against.
You're correct though, that hoe crazy.,

>>1542211
Thanks faggot. Next time my well-trained scam radar goes off just fucking submit like a good little femboy and just say, "Yes, daddy"
I called it from the start.

>>1542218
Act like you've been there before, bitch.

>shills for the party of rape angry that rapists are being held accountable
shocker

>>1542211
>and it's impossible to withdraw consent in the middle of sex,
This nigga literally thinks rape is a game of Red Light Green Light.

>>1542211
>yes I was wrong, but y-you're bad people!
lol you fucking retard

>>1542221
No, I think it's possible for someone to want to have sex with you, and then you hurt them and then they say 'hey stop!' And if you do, you're golden. And if you don't, you're a rapist.
But I'm guessing that's not a problem someone with a micro-dick has had to wrestle with.

>>1542223
>then they say 'hey stop!'
You were unironically expecting these boys to have read her mind, which is a woman-brained attitude.
>micro-dick
Yep, woman confirmed.

>>1542225
>You were unironically expecting these boys to have read her mind
No I wasn't, I was giving you an example of when consent can be withdrawn in the middle of sex. I've already said given the texts she sent I don't think she was raped, I think she's a crazy vindictive hoe.
That's relevant because that's what you guys were arguing. That she withdrew consent in the middle of sex. Which isn't actually what seems to have happened, she seems to have done it after the fact, which is why this isn't rape.
>Fantasizing about me being a woman
Get away from me faggot.

>>1542202
>That's a funny way of saying you're such a retard you don't understand consent.
>she says to stop
>they stop
Why don't you explain it to us then?

>>1542219
Yes we have done this before.
Those who do not know history are doomed to be fucking idiots.

>>1542221
I mean it is, but if she says stop and then tries to hold you accountable for a couple pumps past when she said stop as rape, I'm not convicting on that.

>>1542232
I think the issue doesn't lie here.
It's post coital consent withdrawing that is the problem.
Like everyone found out she fucked a loser, and she says, "No, I didn't. He rape meh!" to avoid the social backlash from, other women mostly, is the real thing here.
I think nearly everyone agrees that if you're boning and she says stop (a couple times) then you should stop.
Thus the liggeral hyper faggot says, "You're still horrible people" because it's projecting it's ideas about you being horrible people on to you unwilling to give you the benefit of the doubt.
It is woman thinking, so it's probably a sorryass FTM troon.

>>1542229
If you follow the chain back, you're just blatantly lying about what was said you disingenuous faggot. You implied she gave consent because she was slut, which is a rapist's understanding of consent. She absolutely gave consent to the first two guys. The other 5 are ambiguous, I think she very obviously didn't want to have sex with 5 of those men, but didn't really care enough to stop them, but that she is deliberately misrepresenting the case means it should be thrown out. I mean she claimed she didn't know anyone at this party, and very clearly knew the 2 guys she was in bed with.
>>1542232
A couple pumps, no, it would be as unreasonable to convict on that as to argue she couldn't change her mind in the middle if she wanted.
>>1542234
>I think the issue doesn't lie here
You're objectively wrong, scroll up and there are literally people arguing for that, like the red-light green-light faggot
Why can you conservative faggots not engage with an actual argument? I plainly laid out my position for your retarded ass, and you're like "nah, that's not your postion. Your position is this strawman I'm going to argue with instead."
Just talk to yourself if you refuse to engage, maybe sort out some of that repressed man-lust.
>Still fantasizing you're a woman.
Fuck, this is probably the most attention his shriveled dick has seen in years, and now he's obsessed with me. Go fuck the red-light green-light faggot, once you start you don't have to stop no matter how many times they say no.

>>1542325
I think you misunderstood a few things and may be retarded or otherwise low iq.

>>1542234
>to avoid the social backlash from, other women mostly, is the real thing here.
Yeah really. We need more sluts in this world. Can't get enough of them really.

>>1542100
Your argument about why they are having their lives ruined falls into some kind of survivorship bias fallacy.

Can we talk about how i feel like this is the first time men seem like they have an answer for the online anti rape culture. Like before it was sort of fringe and just sounded like guys defending rapists. With this one it’s mostly normie style guys who don’t have weird takes on rape and consent being like “yeah pretty tired of this witch hunt, the facts are nuanced and we should be allowed to take them as nuanced why do you find that bad exactly”

>>1542352
This is the biggest problem in the US, men and women both shame women for being slutty. That guy who sent out that “free pussy” texts honestly the thread should have gotten immediately deleted and someone find him and punch him in the face, for being a fucking status seeking autist who didn’t get not to kill the golden goose and just enjoy a fun orgy. What a fucking moron. His seniors that the frat should have knocked his block around for that.

>>1542325
>I think she very obviously didn't want to have sex with 5 of those men,
Which she didn't, in her original report. Unless you count snorting drugs off her body as sex.

>>1542388
I feel like the biggest failure here is that there is no release vaulve for not having fun or retrospectively feeling gross about a group sex act without going nuclear and calling it rape. We have no word for that.

>>1542325
>You implied she gave consent because she was slut,
Also where did I imply this?

lot of salty rapists in this thread
sounds like we should publicly execute these chuds via firing squad to stop MIGA chuds from raping more women and children

>>1542393
Dude she isn’t going to fuck you. She would rather be with the bear remember

>>1542393
guess this is what happens when you let a rapist be president

>>1542393
Your post is the digital equivalent of the homeless guy standing at the street corner talking to himself.

>>1542083
This. We know all 7 defendants, but don't know who train doe is?

she was intoxicated to the level of unconsciousness and they texted each other that there was free pussy to fuck, come and get it. i'm not sure what there even is to fight over here. they obviously raped her. isn't the fight over what should be done about it, not whether they did it or not?

the online feminist complaint seems to have been about the school's handling of it this entire time, claiming that those essays weren't adequate for what she endured and cornell just wanted it covered up. of course they did, all universities and workplaces do. that's why these matters should be handled by actual forensic units and the police rather than anyone who has a vested interest in their reputation.

pretty sure by blasting their names everywhere she's accomplished any goal of harm mitigation by showing everyone "they guys will fuck you when you're unconscious and pass you around", preventing anyone from being that intoxicated with them in the future. at most they should be expelled and/or compelled to provide financial restitution for any legal or therapeutic fees, but if she were ill-intentioned that last part would be easy for her to abuse.

it's the university that should be getting fucked for their attempted coverup. it's not like this is remotely the first girl this would have happened to. and maybe frat bros at cornell should have the basic intelligence not to keep digital records of them offering women to each other? it's fucking cornell - how to hide things and manipulate a narrative will be half of their expensive education.

Reminder that sexual assault is inexcusable

>>1542415
>She was intoxicated to the level of unconsciousness
She wasn't. She texts 2 of the guys later, Jonathan and Mike. Talks about how she consented to group sex with those two. That the others should have seen them in bed and moved on, but that she doesn't regret being with them.
So 2 of the seven didn't rape her. There's ambiguity whether the other 5 did. She didn't want to have sex with them. She didn't go out of her way to stop them or communicate that, and they'd been lead to believe she was down. But she was conscious.
>pretty sure by blasting their names everywhere she's accomplished harm mitigation by showing everyone "they guys will fuck you when you're unconscious and pass you around."
Pretty sure you're wrong, I have seen this case all over and only know two of their names from reading about it here. Sure I could look them up. When's the last time you IDed everyone at a party to check if they were in the news?
>If she were ill-intentioned, that last part would be easy for her to abuse.
The thing is, she is objectively ill-intentioned. In her statement she claims not to have known anyone at the party, and that she was taken advantage of while she was unconscious.
It's obvious from texts she sent to Jonathan Newel and Mike. Again, there's ambiguity about the other 5, but I don't think you get to lie about rape allegations against 2 men, and have people take you seriously about the other 5, especially when you've already waived it off: https://www.tmz.com/2026/10/08/cornell-jane-doe-texts-about-alleged-assault/
>it's the university that should be getting fucked for their attempted coverup. it's not like this is remotely the first girl this would have happened to. and maybe frat bros at cornell should have the basic intelligence not to keep digital records of them offering women to each other?
Agreed. The school should get fucked, and the ethics board should expel everyone involved here, regardless of whether they broke the law.

>>1542325
It's amazing how crippled commies have exactly the same arguments as women.
Is it a low-t thing then?

>>1542004
It's meta as fuck how this is an article about a guy claiming he was sodomized and being ignored, and literally everyone on the thread so far has ignored him and is debating consent and whether the woman was raped.
None of you dumbass chuds actually come here for news, you're all set in your own preconceived biases, you're just here to argue about them.

>>1542433
>It's amazing how crippled commies have exactly the same arguments as women.
I'm neither a cripple nor a commie, and women don't talk to you. But I know you can only argue with strawmen, so have fun while the adults are talking, faggot.

>>1542438
Aha, so you're simply low-t?

>>1542438
he'll probably be dead of liver failure soon enough

>>1542440
I should buy him a drink!

>>1542439
Look i am in this thread not being the simp woke asshole but look you sound 11 years old. Shit is not low t because you don’t like it.

>>1542387
No one can handle nuance anymore bro

>>1542004
>ps. i'm not sure if u remember but i did ket of your cock at some point and i honestly think that was one of the most insane/jaw dropping moments of the night

Holy shit, what a victim! We need to completely destroy these seven men and wreck their lives forever! How dare monsters like this be allowed to breathe free air!

>>1542492
She agreed to six. Six was fine, six was the number, six is not the problem. The seventh one is where it breaks. He took what she signed up for and made it something else, something she did not agree to, something she can barely even remember now because of him. He got expelled, thrown out, sacrificed, gone from the school entirely. He took the punishment because he was the punishment, the extra one, the one who turned six into something she never said yes to.

>>1542457
>Simp Woke Asshole
Do you see any women around? Who would I even be simping for, faggot?
>Low T
Did you sneeze? Were your fucking ears burning? Guilty fucking conscience? Don't police that fucking retard's language, let him sound like the impotent faggot he is you little low-T bitch.

>>1542533
Thanks for adding a lot of good points and ideas cheif

>>1542431
>texts 2 of the guys later
not really negating the concept of being intoxicated into unconsciousness at the time thereby voiding consent, but if you are stating those were her words i'm not going to argue against them.
>Pretty sure you're wrong
well i'm not. i don't care about this case other than this (second) post in here and yet keep seeing it all over the woman part of the internet with every guy involved's names and pics, long before i saw anyone talking about it on here. i don't know why they're all latching onto this particular case. this sort of thing happens all the time. it seems to be some sort of breaking point, i guess, but nothing about public naming-and-shaming involves checking IDs at the door.

honestly, looking at the messages, i don't know what to think. from her portion of it
>i’m getting a little heat (pi phi girls [redacted] and [redacted] can’t get my name out of their mouth)) but that’s to be expected
>i promise i wont get quiet and weird w u like i did last time
seem really telling. he takes it upon himself to message her apologizing and say the men are getting backlash, and she mentions sorority girls won't stop talking about her negatively. what is this "quiet and weird" "last time" part about? the school shouldn't be involved in it and schools shouldn't be having massive parties like this on campus anyway.

>>1542434
there's almost nothing in the article other than "actually this guy says he was sodomized by her while he was incapacitated". he was one of the ones suspended. i can see that as equally likely as the others running a train on her when they're all apparently incredibly intoxicated. he's pissed at the school for not telling him of his rights, i'm not really sure how it would be possible for him not to realize being sodomized is covered under sexual assault but we've already established the school handled everything poorly here.

>>1542686
>Not negating the concept of being intoxicated into unconsciousness
Except it does. If you claim to be unconscious and then privately recall details about the period of time in which you claim to be unconscious, you are lying.
>I'm not wrong, everyone is as plugged in as I am.
They aren't, no, some people don't consume news media at all.
>looking at the messages, I don't know what to think
It seems pretty straightforward that she thought she was in a relationship with Jon and Mike, the relationship ended poorly, and she decided to be vindictive.
Like, they're horrible people, they're at Cornell, they were absolutely stringing this poor dumb slut along, but they aren't rapists.
I still agree there would be ambiguity about the others:
>"at the end of the day you, matt and i were in your bed and they didn't need to get up in that.
Seems like she didn't want to have sex with them.
>" i really liked being w u and matt. so anything anyone has to say about the gamgbang is out of their jurisdiction."
Seems like it didn't really bother her either though. She shouldn't get to decide it's no big deal when she thinks she's a thrupple with john and mike, and decide it was rape after she realizes she's being used.
>>1542535
It's chief. The squiggly red line means you spelled it wrong you fucking low-T retard hypocrite. Was gonna just let this die, but since I have substance to respond to and you dredged it up, fuck you faggot.