China’s trade surplus tops $1 trillion as exports surgehttps://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/china-says-2026-trade-surplus-surpassed-1-tn-in-october-229211China’s trade surplus reached $1.04 trillion in the first 10 months of 2026 as global investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure supported exports of high-tech products and helped offset weak domestic demand.Exports rose 35.2 percent year-on-year in U.S. dollar terms in October, customs data showed on Nov. 10. Growth eased from September’s 36.3 percent but exceeded the 33.5 percent forecast in a Reuters poll.Imports climbed 41.6 percent, accelerating from 31 percent in September and beating expectations of a 32 percent rise. The monthly trade surplus narrowed to $105.3 billion from $133.5 billion.China passed the $1 trillion surplus threshold for a second consecutive year, reaching it a month earlier than in 2025 and putting it on course to exceed last year’s record of nearly $1.2 trillion.The export gains have supported an economy facing subdued consumption and a prolonged property downturn that has weakened household wealth and confidence.The imbalance is also evident in the car market. Passenger vehicle exports rose 68.2 percent year-on-year in October, while domestic sales fell 27.3 percent, according to the China Passenger Car Association.Weak demand at home has pushed automakers to seek more buyers overseas.The growing surplus could increase pressure for further trade restrictions, particularly in the European Union.Beijing and Brussels have agreed to limit Chinese hybrid-vehicle exports to the bloc, but the measures have yet to take effect. Manufacturers are expected to bring shipments forward, supporting exports in the near term.
Excellent work President Trump! It's too bad the communist pro-China liggerals are working overtime to ensure they stop your absolute beatdown of the Chinese economy. Iran, China, why do liggerals """Americans""" love siding with our enemies?
>>1547621Sending the rest of the world into the arms of China to own the libs
>>1547626That's fake news. That never happened. If it did, no one cares. America First
>>1547627thanks for admitting that you don't understand the english language
>>1547627>nuh-uh, nuh-uh, I know you are but what am I
>America FirstBut enough about this literal faggot that isn't American and Nick Fuentes
>Pro communismYou mean the trump regime given one of their top business people was caught fucking a Chinese spy that trump knew about for over a year and looked the other way?
>>1547643There really needs to be a word for fake and gay takes from homosexual Internet leftists.
>>1547650I dub such takes as "liggerquips".
>fake and gay takes from homosexual rightists on the internetAnd that's just what the likes of 1547650 1547651 say.
>>1547653no u is old'd asf, unc.
>old'dAnd that's what the esl shill says.Hi, esl shill 1547657 wanting to be humiliated.
>>1547659>Humiliates itself constantly>Think it's humiliating othersYou're a such a huge fucking faggot.
1547660>Humiliates itself constantlyYes, that's what the projecting actual esl shill 1547657 1547660 does.The esl shill 1547660 thinks it can say others are the ones being humiliated. >>1547637 is right about 1547660. But then, the actual esl shill 1547660 can think?>You're a such a huge fucking faggotThe projecting esl shill is always reduced to being immature.
>>1547663>The projecting esl shill is always reduced to being immature.Have you read the slop you've been posting for the past 3 years you fucking nard? I don't know exactly who BTFO'd you to the point where you simply post nonsensical shit for like 22 hours a day, but the humiliation shows as you're terrified of participating in debates or discussion of any kind.And if you're trolling to simply drive engagement or pick up Gets, you're a bigger loser sperg than expected, if that's even possible.
>Have you read the slop you've been posting for the past 3 years you fucking nard? I don't know exactly who BTFO'd you to the point where you simply post nonsensical shit for like 22 hours a day, but the humiliation shows as you're terrified of participating in debates or discussion of any kind.>And if you're trolling to simply drive engagement or pick up Gets, you're a bigger loser sperg than expected, if that's even possible>you're trollingBut enough about the esl shill 1547651 that projects so much it makes IMAX obsolete.
>>1547666>it makes IMAX obsolete.Hey, nice "GET"! Whoa. That one goes in the collection, huh, spergy?And IMAX uses lasers now, dipshit.
>spergy>dipshitSays the projecting esl shill 1547667 reduced to being immature.
>>1547668Do you remember me asking you to post bullshit?No? Because I wasn't talking to you, you fucking sperg.
>post bullshit15476511547657154766015476651547667The projecting 1547669 has the memory of a goldfish.>you fucking sperg1547669 is still reduced to being immature.
>>1547671So you're objecting to "liggerquips" by being a huge fucking retard?Liggerals do be like that.
So you're objecting to others referring to you as "esl shill", 1547672?1547657>old'd>will never beat the esl shill allegations. Its reaction:1547660>You're a such a huge fucking faggotQED.Do you remember anyone asking you to post bullshit?>needing to spam "liggeral"Hypocrites do be like that.
>>1547643So, you complaint is about people complaining about this piece of bullshit you made up?>You mean the trump regime given one of their top business people was caught fucking a Chinese spy that trump knew about for over a year and looked the other way?So you've decided to sperg post like a little faggot in esl-bot speak?Interesting tactic. I'm not sure what your goal is, but it's probably not working.Try being more interesting if you want to @ me, OK?
>>15476431547676's complaint is that it can't dispute facts and evidence, so is reduced to this tactic: 1547651 that definitely isn't working or it would be able to prove others wrong with actual facts and not immature behavior.Its trying not to be humiliated, but 1547676 makes it so easy for others to point and laugh at it.
>>1547609Sounds like shitloads of roads coming though. Thanks for giving back via tariffs, China.I want to be a welfare baby. Keep up the good work!
>>1547675>>1547678Excellent examples of liggerquips. Thanks for showing us how it's done, piggy.
1547755Why do you even post here?
Daily reminder a trade surplus is a bad thing and this means Presidents trade war is succeeding
Newsflash: CEO of Palantir now supports the Democrats.https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2026/11/11/palantir-ceo-alex-karp-says-he-is-open-to-backing-democrats-in-2028-elections/This crushes the Trump.
Clinton spoke with Trump on the golf course in the '90s and Trump even supported tariffs then. Clinton and his experts knew that tariffs don't work except in specific industries in specific cases. We are seeing this idiot double down on his bad ideas yet again.>>1547818It absolutely is not. Find for me somewhere in your precious libertarian dogma that a trade surplus is bad.
>>1547621It is psychological absurdity
>>1547860>Tariffs are bad>Taxes are goodSeriously do you work for China or something?Once again, I'll remind you that taxes operate exactly like tariffs. The difference is that one is a tax to access a market, and the other is a tax on people.You're a shitty little fucktard if you don't support higher tariffs on China specifically, but support higher taxes on resident businesses and people.
>>1547471'“a large group of people” think immigrants who are “good people, working in a landscaping company or working in a hotel or doing something ... and, in some cases, paying taxes,” should be “allowed to stay.”Taxes are good, Trump agrees, don't bother him about it.'We will fail in this endeavor if the free countries do not continue their reduction of the barriers which they themselves impose on their trade with each other'Tariffs are bad. Republican president Dwight D. Eisenhower agrees, don't bother him about itHaving a trade surplus is neither good nor bad. Reality agrees, don't bother it about it.Is Trump being allowed to politically exist in the White House a bad thing?Those in Texas, Kansas and now Mississippi agree it is, don't bother voters in those previously red states about it.
>>1547869>Once again, I'll remind you that taxes operate exactly like tariffs. The difference is that one is a tax to access a market, and the other is a tax on people.Yes yes Donald we know you don't understand how tariffs work.
>>1547880Feel free to explain it. I'll even read a broken English post if you think you can. Chinaman.
>>1547880At least the likes of 1547897 admit they're illiterate. It's why a certain book was written by Tony SchwartzI bet there weren't any tariffs between a US led by Dwight D. Eisenhower and Taiwan. The former promoted zero tariffs as a way of spreading freedom.
>NVidia stocks plummet after CEO Jensen Huang is given the bootI wonder how much Trump invested in his precious 'Super Intelligence' via this company? In Soviet America, crushed is you, Donnie.Big Green will have to downscale to recover being crushed stock price-wise, so they'll have to focus on what made them what they are: GPUs.Still, they should be able to get a good price on all the RAM, SSDs etc on eBay when those datacenters are dismantled. Those living near such will be able to get a good night's sleep too. Cheaper water bills as well.Should have kept your own 'RTX 5090' in your pants, Jensen Wang.
