Gasoline should be banned.
EVs should be banned.
>>28954244The car in video was a Infiniti QX60 SUV. What car model was burning on the boat?
>>28954249>What car model was burning on the boat?All of them
>>28954252All of what?
>>28954253the EVs.
>>28954242progressive faggots should be banned.
>>28954242look at all those dumbfucks recording that close
AYO SENPAI IM FINNA PUT THIS ON TIKTOK BRUH GONNA GET HELLA LIKES BRO FR FR I WAS THERE LET ME TELL YOU ABOUT HOW I WAS THERE
>>28954242>>28954242Eh, this fire looks really bad because of all the soot but it probably didn't do much damage and was easy to put out relative to an EV fire
>>28954408>EV>fireBro, I have like 10 or 15 Lithium batteries in my house for over a decade and none of them have caught fire.
>>28954450>my house hasn't burnt down>fires must not be real
I saw an ICE fire in 2012. Drunk driver ran into a tree. It was this tiny little fire for a while then after like 5-10 minutes it got through to the tank and there was a huge fireball, then it burned away in a mild fire.If you just look at the fireball, sure, it seems bad, but no one got hurt and wall street didn't burn down.EV fires burn more intensely, the fire ramps up more quickly, and it can't be put out as easily as this one was. It takes hours to over a day to completely extinguish an EV fire.
>>28954242>>28954244You people demand vehicles that fly down the road at 80mph for hours at a time and then bitch when the energy storage required to do so does what will inevitably occur over enough vehicles and time. Both of you deserve to develop a cycling hobby.
>>28954497You're complaining about cars, on a car board. Maybe you should be banned. You go into any other hobby board bitching about the hobby, you get banned. EVs store more energy density, I thought that was the selling point?
Just sabotage the evs charge port Problem solved. Of course, don't do this in real life. Do it in minecraft.
>>28954242you should be banned
>>28954242>wait until he discovers that 90+% of ICE fires start off as electrical fires
>>28954567>wait till he finds out it's 2%
>>28954242Your moms fat pussy should be banned
>>28954263Probably started with the hybrid. They are far more likely to spontaneously blow up compared to EVs. Just look at the millions of recalls Goyota and Ford have done for their garage fire hybrids. EVs are the least likely to spontaneously start burning.
>>28954468EV fires are less likely to occur as it requires larger trauma to penetrate the battery than the vulnerable engine AND they don't blow up. Meaning they give plenty of time for the passengers to evacuate alongside people in the proximity. An ICE fire may look calm and controlled but can at any minute explode in your face. This is partly due to EVs being way safer than ICE cars. Just avoid China/Tesla EVs with hidden mechanical locks. Always buy a car with real door handles.
>>28954846>EV fires are less likely to occur as it requires larger trauma to penetrate the battery than the vulnerable engine AND they don't blow up.What timing, I am that anon. I'm well aware, I also don't give a shit. Car fires are rare as hell and are mostly due to negligence or accidents. Karen doesn't notice the rodents making a nest in her engine bay, Timmy thinks he can wire 20 home speakers into his car with a youtube guide. That sorta thing.But fires are rare as hell in general, why would I care? You think I'm giving up manual, RWD, LSD, 1k kg, no aids, no screens car to buy the product you're shilling because it's less likely to catch fire? I clean my engine bay with disinfecting wipes, I'm not worried about that kind of fire and in an accident I'd have more time to clear the area than you do in an EV.
>>28954845no it was the EVs.
>>28954850If fires don't matter, then why did you make a big deal of it?>inb4 I was not that anonThen why reply to me?I actually agree with you. I generally care very little for safety compared to other factors but there is this FUD against EVs when hybrids are proven time and time again to be the most likely to spontaneously blow up. And they're worse than EV fires since EVs atleast don't have a combustion engine in it also loaded with flammable liquids. >I'm not worried about that kind of fire and in an accident I'd have more time to clear the area than you do in an EV.I don't think you do. There is no risk of an explosion in an EV. It's just a constant static fire. It takes hours to put out (the best thing is just let it burn out on its own) but atleast the passengers have plenty of time to notice the fire and evacuate.Of course this is all assuming you don't drive a death trap Temu/Tesla car with mechanical locks hidden away.
>>28954854>far more hybrids than EVs transported>hybrids far more likely to spontaneously catch fireYeah it was most likely a hybrid. Probably a Goyota given their mad desperate fire recalls as of late.
>>28954854Yeah.Gas cars usually only have 1-2 gallons when loaded on a ship. More to the point, how would a gas car spontaneously catch on fire when not running or hot without some outside ignition source? Has anyone heard of that before?
>>28954857>If fires don't matter, then why did you make a big deal of it?Because you and/or others (see: OP) were talking about it as it ICE fires are worse to shill products. I just wanted to set the record straight, I didn't bring it up, I never bring it up. A charged EV would've been a catastrophe in that location.
>>28954858ok you're an idiot.
>>28954859There was some American made hybrid that was catching fire briefly, but it was because of bug in the software for the the electric system and the gas was just an additional item that would burn with it once the batteries lit up. Can't remember the car but it would just combust when sitting completely off and unplugged in peoples garages as the electrics didn't truly shutdown on it or something.As far as an combustion car just catching at fire randomly without having been physically damaged or running at the time, I can't think of a single one.
>>28954859>More to the point, how would a gas car spontaneously catch on fire when not running or hot without some outside ignition source? Has anyone heard of that before?Yes they canhttps://www.drive.com.au/news/bmw-and-mini-recall-24000-cars-due-to-fire-risk/But hybrids are still most likely to spontaneoudly catch firehttps://caredge.com/guides/hybrid-car-fires
>>28954879>how would a gas car spontaneously catch on fire when not running or hotThe story in your link says it will only happen if the vehicle is running and being driven though.
>>28954879>If this occurs, the leaking coolant and recirculated exhaust gas may combine, which may result in a reduction of engine power and potentially a fire while driving.so still only when the engine is running
>>28954882>>28954880Sorry linked the wrong recall!https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/26/us/bmw-fire-recallThat's the one.
>>28954884>caused by an electric short circuit and not by the engine or the very fuel source itself
they were probably charging wrong or something
>>28954885The end result is the same bud. Fire in your ICE car.
>>28954888A tank of fuel can't catch fire on its own with no catalyst, but a battery can.
EVs seem to have far more potential to be a target for a hezbollah pager type attack than old gas cars, TBQH.
>>28954893That's nice, but unfortunately cars aren't just a tank of fuel and nothing else.
>>28954450shut up retard
>>28955394that goes both ways...
>>28954888Electric short circuits aren't something that just happens. That's after years of corrosion and negligence.Also, ICE cars all have their batteries disconnected before being transported on ships. EVs don't because they need to be driven off without doing a bunch of bullshit.
>>28956126I really doubt hybrids get their electric driveline disabled during shipment.
>>28956123yep and when you factor in everything ICE cars are ~50x more likely to catch fire than EVs.
