BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHA
>>28960819>Honestly it looks alright for a crossover. What does it sell for, 40k? And who was it by, hyundai?What the fuck ferrari
>>28960819What the absolute fuck, I thought this was supposed to be some $40k entry model or some shit for taxes.
I genuinely like it. But it doesn’t look fast and so it will not be a car that sells as a Ferrari.
What an absolute hunk of shit.You can't even defend it with a "well you're poor!"Imagine any ferrari enthusiast now, and you present them with this, it's a fucking hunk of shit.Atleast the mazda ripoff thing they have has a V12.This thing actually has zero redeemable qualities
>>28960819They probably wanted to test the waters to see how much they could get away with not coming up with an actual good looking car.
>>28960876I am baffled how this got green lit for production.As a concept car, sure, we would all be willing to accept it as a shock media piece.But to actually put this into production and not expect any backlash from either customers or investors is mad. Not only does it stray away from current design language, it's also moving away from "you buy engine and the rest of the car is thrown in for free" ethos as they still cast their own engine blocks etc.They won't be coiling their own EV motors or putting lithium into their own batteries, who the fuck thought this could work for them.
>>28960868Yeah hopefully it'll get pushed down market into Maserati or Alfa or something.>>28960902>who the fuck thought this could work for them.kikes
>>28960819This design is already like 20 years out of date. How did Ferrari ever approve such a thing?
>first porsche>then Lamborghini>then mercedes>now FerrariWHY ARE ALL THESE LUXURY BRANDS KILLING THEMSELEVS WHILE NORMIE BRANDS LIKE NISSAN, TOYOTA, FORD, DODGE/RAM, ETC. ARE MAKING ACTUALLY INTERESTING CARS?
Didn't they have Dino for this shit?
>>28960819this is how all cars (+80% will be electric) will look like in 10 yearsyou are laughing now but this looks very ahead of its time
>ferrari with no soundWhat's the point.
>>28960819holy shit
>>28960868>>28960840If Hyundais looked like this, it would be a massive improvement for them. Too bad the gooks are so comically gaudy
>>28960819The car seems like it's going to be the low $30k used in 4 years
>>28960868This is like some artist's render from a magazine's "Cars of the Future" article from 2004
>>28960819You can tell from the rims that they are purposefully sabotaging their own product so that it won't sell well.
>>28961021Its endearing, and gives them a distinct image. It's terribly easy to spot a modern Hyundai on the road
Electric supercars are just as retarded as those luxury mobile phones from the mid-00s.
>>28960819I'M RUINED
>>28960819This is a humiliation ritual. Some top exec got caught fucking some child to death and they’re making them release this abomination. Same reason why Dodge released the all electric charger.
>>28960949"luxury" is codeword for humiliation ritual, only the most subhuman of goyboys take part in such activities
Looks like a BYD or some other chink car that some loser slapped Ferrari badges on. Maybe that's the point, after all we know how desperate brands are to get into the Chinese market.
>>28961104Being uniquely hideous isn't a good thing
>>28960819Actually amazing that they stole the spotlight from Mercedes for ugliest new piece of shit almost instantly
>those huge black areas around the bottom to try to hide how awkwardly tall it actually is.I yawn.
You know these will sell no matter how shit they are anyways.You want an allocation for the next V12 from the dealership?Buy a Luce, buy a Purosangue, buy a 2nd Luce, buy a 3rd Luce.
Remember when people used to say EV drivetrain is way smaller than that of petrol cars so in the future there are way more freedom in car design?Remember that?WHY ARE ALL NEW EVS A STUPID EGGSHAPED CVCKOVERS???TESLA CVCKOVERBMW CVCKOVERMUSTANG E CVCKOVERNISSAN LEAF CVCKOVERFERRARI LUCE CVCKOVERWHY WHY WHY
>>28961222I can see this being a major controversy later on since Ferrari dealers are known scumbags. Imagine if one of them tries to tell a oil Baron that if they must purchase 10 luces' to get on the list for a limited edition Ferrari
>>28960819>BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAWe need to give this car praise so they build the pile of shit. This is the best looking Ferrari in a long time. Finally the gay community has a new car. https://x.com/VoteLambright/status/2059180984604749849
>>28961255Nothing will happen, believe it or not oil barons don't have the borderline religious obsession with ICE that people here do to the point they will have an emotional breakdown at the idea of having to legally own an EV. They will buy ten of them, sell them or give them away, then proceed to give no further fucks.
>>28961334Dear Ferrari I created an Estate Luce. What would it cost to make, money is no object for me. https://x.com/VoteLambright/status/2059189104844345594
>>28961340Dear Ferrari, I created an Estate Luce Pride Edition. The gay community needs this! Take our money! https://x.com/VoteLambright/status/2059189880203403666
>EU regulations force manufacturers to create cars people dont want so they can keep making cars people do want and massively increase the amount of toxic waste in the worldthankyou EU
>>28960819Imagine paying 5x more than a Tesla for a car that is slower and uglier and less reliable.>>28961021Its design cues seem to come from the same place as the recent VW ID. Buzz van redesign. Also, Hyundai models like the Ioniq 5 and 6 have pretty radical designs.
>>28960819honestly, the basic silhouette is not terrible, but why is so stubby? Looks like a toy car, the wheels are oversized and it's just too tall.
>>28961375Was wondering about the same exact same thing, the big VAG EVs have normal sports sedan proportions in comparison My guess is this is just a crossover but they don’t want to sell it like that
>>28960819It's a future classic and you all know it
>>28961104It's fucking gay as aids
>>28961217oh no no no no no
I'd get this and a civic
>>28961399It's boring, thus a Borrari!By VVayne Lambright!
>>28961247The problem is not the engine but the battery, everyone puts the battery in the floor so they have to raise the roof.
I swear the first one to make a Formula E car street legal would scoop the whole market
>>28961340station wagons really do just look better don't the->notices the taillightsoh. that's what happened.
>>28961493Literal full scale Mini 4WD for overgrown 13yo kids.
>>28960868Remove the raised blue part from on top of the sloped black front so that the blue is only on the sides, while the front is the white lights and yellow logo against the black. Still a strange design but it's almost like car + futuristic EV layer added on.
>>28960819I want to formally apologize to the BMW I8, I didn't know what horrors lurked ahead
>>28961495So like every supercar
>>28961247It's just the battery, you can't use old supercar platforms because you can not fit batteries underneath an already very low car. So unless you want your cog 1.5m high the only viable form factor is a compact suv lmao.
Enzo Ferrari is rotating in his grave.
>>28961366>ionic 5 and 6 have pretty radical designs.Saudi Arabia has some pretty radical islam
What a gaping anus
>>28960819THIS MONSTROSITY..... COSTS 550 THOUSAND EUROS!?
>>28961079I see shades of 90s Pontiac concept cars
>>28961222purosangue is in high demand new , or at least was when i checked. people actually want them
>>28961574I kinda like that especially with how the curvature flows into the wheels
>>28961607They're diluting the brand. It's like the central bank printing money to ease conditions. It just creates inflation = the money is worth less.
>>28960819>>28960848the rear is genuinely awful. it has that gay "black bars are cool! (not)" color scheme that they've ruined other modern ferraris with. The front & side look like any basic bitch commuter prius but somehow worse. Wheels are cool at least (if they were on a prius, and not a ferrari)
>>28960819Or 4343990.33 Yuanbecause it's for the Chinesehttps://techcrunch.com/2026/05/26/ferraris-first-ev-is-not-for-you/
NGL I am feeling very Chinese right now guys.
>>28960819back looks like a ps2 racing game
>>28961113This. There's no such thing as a premium or luxury EV just like there's no luxury smartphones or digital watches. Electronics either work reliably or they're shit. That's it.Cars are solved and all old luxury ICE car companies are doomed. China solved cars, the rest is a footnote.
>>28961190BYD has an electric hyper car that actually looks like a sports car rather than an iPhone and beat the Chiron speeds. You can buy it for 3m dollars. Or you can shell out 550k for this Ferrari kek
>>28962322Luxury companies chasing the bottom line forget that luxury is built on being objectively better in some aspect, and EV can only be as good as other EV's which all have extremely similar battery structures and therefore the same performance. The only difference is range, and even then luxury buyers don't really care about range, so you really are just trying to tell a rich person to spend an ultra premium on a sub-tesla or a sub-BYD car.
>>28962335it's basically a modern rehash of what happened in the jap bubble economy of the late 80s-early 90s. everyone was rich so marques were putting all sorts of wild gizmos in their cars to woo the most buyers over.
>>28962335Technically, it would be possible to build a "true" luxury electric car. However, it would involve way more than what a regular company would be willing to spend. Ex. you'd have to license the electric motor and inverter from Koenigsegg (lightest tech on the market), the batteries from BYD (highest density cells available), you'd have to develop a multi-speed transmission (massive flex in an electric car) in-house (you could buy out one of the concept sketches which have appeared in the past couple of years, but you're still on the hook to make a usable product out of it), and you'd have to develop a dash using mechanical dials (for even more flex) from scratch.
>>28960840This.It looks decent enough. For a Hyundai.But a Ferrari - no way.
surely this will be the vehicle that turns the company arou-AACK!
>>28961537Imagine the torque
>>28960819Ferrarisisters... they're laughing at us...
>>28960819
>>28962614Kek
>>28962614Where did you get that from, reddit?
>550,000 euro Tesla Prius SportHa, hahahaha. AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>28962722Designed by same guy who did Apple's magic mouse, too
>>28962732Is the charging port under the car?
why do all the EV designs shit the bed
>>28962304Sometimes I forget that 4chan is available in Canada
>>28962757"we want the Chinese audience" from people who still think it's 2010's China. Chinese customers have moved on from the early bubbly futurism to just getting a car that happens to be electric, so these retarded euro brands are going to flop hard while Buick of all brands makes bank
>>28960819>be Ferrari>99.999999% of your clientele wants posh car with big enigne that goes vrooooom>make generic chinkshit EV
>>28962757>EVcorrect me if i'm wrong, but isn't the whole point of AMG, that hand build engine?
>>28962843They make those cars, some say even too many different models.This is an attempt at capturing even more marketshare.
>>28962847Yes, just like with Brabus, point of AMG is to improve performance, and the engines all are hand built. AMG EV doesn't make any sense whatsoever.>>28962888Because just like with everything else, (((private equity))) and MBA retards are forcing them to. Ferrari is luxury brand for enthusiasts and puritans who want sports car, not Prius knockoff.
>>28961340This actually looks proportional now.
>>28960819Theres a certain appeal to the universal revulsion the car is receiving
>>28962698slop version of >>28962942
>>28960819It shouldnt be called a ferrariIf it was a budget lancia then maybeStill while not exactly pretty its weirdness gives it some sort of weird appealAlas its a cuckover ev so I wouldnt care even If I had enough money to wasteIf they slimmed it down and made it a hybrid sedan then maybe but then again sedan ferraris probably wont sell to hardcore ferrari owners,they have better options for family carriers\practical vehicles
Did it ever matter what it looked like? Wouldn't a Ferrari EV be ill-received on this board and everywhere in the industry regardless of what the shape was?So what if someone wants to spend $650k on this? What are you going to do, complain?
>>28960819and you will buy it
yeah a man can only daily a jet car these days
>>28963000>If it was a budget lanciaFuck no! No brand that made a car as great as the Delta integrale deserves to have this lady shaver on wheels be associated with them.
>>28961574Too bad current technology is not good enough to make a really low and sleek ev. They're all fat, tall and bulbous
>>28961015It actually not only has "Ferrari engine sound", but it also has "Ferrari engine vibrations". All fake obviously. It's even worse that you could imagine just by looking at it.
>>28961334wayne why you gotta do em like that
>>28961399It's not even original; faggot just poached a bertone design from all the way back in the 90s and made it gay
What was a bigger hate letter to the fans, this thing, the crossover Lamborghini or the EV Charger?
>>28963475>90sIt's actually from the 80s (89)..
>>28963479This one, no contest, given the brand's history and notoriety and the magnitude of the fuckup.
>>28963479Btw, Lamborghini already had made a SUV, the lm002
>>28963513This straight up looks like a Chinese kit car.
>>28963479EV Charger with Challenger.SUV Lambo was inevitable because just like Porsche, Lamborghini always struggled financially and they know that luxury SUVs sell so they decided to focus on making fancier cars alongside something that has wider appeal. Everybody who know the industry and history of Lamborghini know this. Before Urus, Lamborghini even made LM002 and wanted to score military contracts for money but only ended up making 300 units for private users and called it quits.EV Challenger and Charger are straight up malice.
>>28960869Imagine spending a large midwestern house on a Ferrari that gets gapped by anyone in a depreciated 2022 plaid and range-matched by a model Y performance.
>>28963771It might as well be, IIRC it was literally just some rich oilfag threw money at them and said "Make something big"
>>28963771Originally it was supposed to be humvee adjacent because Lamborghini thought they could score military money but it only attracted old money and oil tycoon types, and because Lamborghini overestimated themselves, they couldn't keep up with all orders they got.
>>28963771That started as a mil vehicle; when that didn't pan out, they turned to the rich.No different than a civ H1
>>28960819It looks like the designer had a dream about this, then woke up and tried to sketch it from memory, but got flashbanged by a tesla crossover while drawing. I know ferrari is a lifestyle/merch brand that sells cars to tasteless arabs, but this thing is ugly and boring to look at. Even the unibrow nu ferrari and v6 ugmobile they make at least don't fill you with the urge to yawn upon seeing them like this dull thing.>>28960868You have really shit taste.
