>Ferrari ev>600k>slow>ugly>makes former ceo sucidalWhat were they thinking?
It really seems like the sort of thing that's going to get at least a few people fired
how many threads do we need for this piece of shit
>>28963533If a car company actually gave a shit they would have an automotive entrance exam for any incoming executive. Require them to describe understeer vs oversteer. If they fail they dont get hired, if they are already an employee they get fired with cause.
Tesla won
>>28963533The Model S looks more like a Ferrari than the Nissan Luce.
>EU outlaws production of ICE vehicles after 2035>"why are car companies making so many EVs now??? must be the retarded CEOs"and this is why nothing ever gets better.
>>28963533I like the old Luce better than the new Luce.
>>28963533>>What were they thinking?eu has a gay law about emissions across your whole range, they make a shitty ev and they save their v12s
>>28963785Low volume vehicles are explicitly exempt from emissions regulations precisely so the millionaires can still get v12 gas guzzlers. A 600k EV is not about emissions.
>>28963746>looks worse than a model s>is slower than a model s>is WAY more expensive than a model smaking electric cars is one thing but god damn did they do a bad job of it.
>>28963533Step One should have been bullying their way onto Formula EStep 2 should have been a Formula E drivetrain in a 2 seat full carbon roadster.
>literally a lucer