Does this kind of car exist?>made within the last 25 years>RWD>reliable>fuel efficient but not diesel or hybrid
mustang
pentastar chally wally
oh, and most important of all, not an EV either
>>28969630my man.
>>28969628Miata, Pontiac Solstice/Saturn Sky, 2.3l Mustang, Toyota MRS, there's plenty out there friendo
GR SupraM140iM240iM340iM440iZ4 M40i540i740i840iMustang GTCamaro SSChallenger R/T6.2l C63 AMGoff the top of my head (just scratching the surface), there are literally hundreds of cars that fit this extremely vague criteria.
>>28969663>BMW>reliablelol. lmao even
>>28969668B58/ZF8 combo is honestly unrivaled in a performance to reliability context. even modern LS with 6L/8L80 combos have more common problems with lifters and converters shitting the bed for starters. you probably don't even own a car and if you do you'll be too embarrassed to post it here.
>fuel efficient>RWDseems like you're asking for two unrelated things?
>>28969703You have to be 18 to post here.
>>28969784If you want help, you'll have to explain what you're having trouble with. And in the future, don't admit to being underage.
>>289696282011-2017 3.7 mustang. 2011 and 2012 had a bad driveshaft but irrelevant if you keep it below 120 and an easy junkyard trip if you won't. Only other reliability concern is the water pump except it doesn't concern you at all because the longitudinal version had a completely different design that doesn't take out the engine when it goes.By the numbers, these cars are extremely similar to a 370z, and if it weren't for the horse on the front they would have a much bigger following. I fully expect these to be drift taxed to hell a decade from now. They sound unreasonably good with a cat back. 500 to the tire on 93 octane with the Auto Mafia Racing single turbo kit, stock bottom end. I keep trying to tell you guys, these cars are slept on.
>>28969628C5 Corvettes can hit 35+mpg highway. People swap Corvette engines into planes so they're definitely reliable.
>>28969859a 370z isnt that expensive...$10-12k can get you into a pre-facelift 09-14 with 100-140k miles in most of the country. budget $2-3k for the galley gaskets when they crap out if you let a shop do it.
>>28969859>2011-2017 3.7 mustangis there a reason you phrase it as v6 mustang:)
>>28969862>People swap Corvette engines into planes
>>28969871https://youtu.be/0Wab-AVbU3AFlies, too.
HelloIs it me you're looking for?
>>28969867Yes, because these cars also came with an overstressed inline 4 and an excellent V8 as option. The 4 is... not great. The v8 is a great motor but not as fuel efficient as the v6.
>>28969628toyota mark ii/chaser
>>28969663while the OP is a vagueposter, if you use critical thinking, you'd realise that the requirements of;>fuel efficient>reliable >last 25 yearsboth strongly imply he doesn't want to spend a lot of money on the car. So most of that list doesn't apply.>6.2l C63 AMGpost a clown-costume image next time so everyone can save time not reading your posts, jesus...
>>28969940most of that list can be had for under $30k. and the old NA 6.2l V8s were very reliable if outfitted with updated head bolts mr wrenchlet.
i basically want 2 cars, a RWD/4WD suzuki grand vitara with a normal, non tiny-dicked turbo engine, a real engine, that isn't $30k+And a rear wheel version of my manual 2013 lancer with a v6 instead of the 4cylinder.
>>28969628Any lexus is/gs/esLS is also reliable apart from the front suspension
>>28969628Miata
>>28969674>plastic engine and automatic transDude kill yourself lol
>>28970040all I see is>no car>no tools>no kidswhy would anyone respect you lol
>>28970039>too low to the ground, no visibility around traffic>no storage space>only a coupe>girls car>old with zero modern features, will need a new deck+audio system>engine is only fast because the cars tiny and lightweightI suppose its okay to take grandma to church on sundays.
>>28970044>old with zero modern featureshow is that a problem>will need a new deck+audio systemlolwut. why? they're fine if you're not some hyper autistic audiophile
Ctsv
g35
>>28969663>6.2l C63 AMGThese are borderline on the "reliable" thing. They're getting old, low mileage ones are expensive, high mileage ones are prone to some expensive problems.t. daily drove a W211 E63 AMG wagon for a few years.
>>28969628The Miata obviously
>>28969628the humble v6 dodge challenger
>>28969628Mx5
my s2000 does me well
>>28969628Porsche 911. I average 20 mpg.
>>28970567>somebody please like me
>>28969628GR86 unironically
>>28970074>no google maps without sticking a phone holder to your windscreen>no hands free for phone calls>no phone charger>no bluetooth connection for musiccome on anon, these are the minimum requirements for a functional car in 2026. Do you still use a street directory to get around?
>>28970567Under 30 isn't efficient
>>28970705lol i wish i had one. they're comfyi just remember the route beforehand or use the signs along the wayi actually have a phone holder on my windscreen but that's because i use my phone to see engine readoutsi've dailied a 30 year old car for years. it's a nothingburger if you can simply call someone back when you're not driving
>>28969930I would probably agree but those have the steering wheel on the wrong side and there is an insane drift tax on them also
>>28971048toyota cressida
>>28970713It's fine. You have to go to a rattly 4 cylinder to get 30s but then you'll be a cylinderlet
>>28969884>macpherson strut>slushboxPic not related lmao
>>28969930Poor fuel economy unless get a slushbox 1ge
>>28969628MIATAISALWAYS*THEANSWER
