Was this car simply ahead of its time? I think Porsche bet too much and too early on EVs when they should've launched the Taycan around this time. After the blunders of Ferrari and others, I think Porsche got too little credit for what a great car this was, albeit initially plagued with baby illnesses.
No. The soulless electric transport appliances should not be made at any time, especially not by a company built on sports cars.
>>28985234t. jeet that drives a Goyota hybrid and thinks he's an authority on the subject
>>28985238Do you have a pile of rotting garbage where your brain is supposed to be? Jeets and chinks are the ones pushing this soulless slop.
>>28985243Nah jeets love hybrids and pollution.
Porsche has the stupidest model names,next to only hyundai.
>>28985228It's the only EV that I would want to own right now, but even then, the battery tech is still not good enough for me
>>28985228>Nobody care about sport EV/Thread
>>28985228>especially not by a company built on sports cars.problem is that it looks gay and fat + auto only and guaranteed 50,000$ battery replacement. its a temporary car, not really worth talking about
>>28985228N.A.R.P.
>>28985286>it looks gay and fatIt looks like a Porsche>auto onlyLike most Porsche these days>and guaranteed 50,000$ battery replacementNow this is simply not true.
>>28985228>too little credit for what a great car this wasWhat was great about it? It offers nothing any other EV doesn't offer. And they expect you pay a quarter million just to get the same level of performance as a 100k Tesla?
There's nothing really wrong with it and it looked a million times better than the panamera. But if you're even considering an EV then just get a Tesla. There's not even a close second place.
