I hate nu-cars so much bros
>>28985394>3.6s 0-60 in the gt-pp trim, faster than 95% of every other mustang trim in history>4 doors for more whores>liftgate for actual usability.>mustangs are already fat so nothing of value was lost making it fatter>awd is superior to rwd anyways. >running costs are next to nothing>maintenence is next to nothing. Stay mad faggot.
>>28985423>0-60Are you 12, ricer?
>>28985451It's using a trip, what do you think?
They look cool
>>28985394Ford is a faggot company, what do you expect? laissez faire
>>28985423>This guy posted this in less than 2 minutes after the OP..
>>28985498>you are now aware of resident coordinated shills on /o/
>>28985423i mean if i wanted something faggy, all those evslop tesla shitmobiles outperform this without sullying the name and image of the mustang.
>>28985394This is surprisingly enough one of the best EVs out there with godlike reliability. Far better than Temu Tesla.
Mogs ICE mustangs
>>28985394Literally a Mazda CX-3 form factor
>>28985423>maintenence is next to nothingThats because this car is for roasties with their boyfriends money who know nothing about cars and just want the bragging rights of owning a Mustang. You are a faggot.
>>28985394faster then you're shitbox LOL
>>28985699I am not shitbox
>>Farley’s comments from a May 2024 interview have recently resurfaced and gained traction on social media, with the CEO saying at the time, “We will never build a Mustang that isn’t a Mustang.”>>“One thing I can promise, however, is that we will never make an all-electric Mustang,” Farley said in an interview with Autocar at the time.Just waiting for the Probe EV.
>>28985394Probably someone in touch with what the goyim want and will buy
>>28985394People that like money? Everyone loves the Mustang, crossover SUVs are the most popular bodystyle right now, and electric cars are booming.
>>28985861>and electric cars are booming.kek. lmao.
>>28985501honestly not sure if it's sadder if it was coordinated shilling, or not>>28985606ford has an awful habit of reviving dead model names to be used on new ones that are a shadow of the originals
>>28985423This anon owns a Mach E btw if that matters
>>28985394Oh. I assure you it wasn't a single faggot. It was an entire room of them.
>>28985423shut up nigger
>>28985985Which is what we like to call a circus
>>28985423Begone fagboy
>>28985968>ford has an awful habit of reviving dead model names to be used on new ones that are a shadow of the originalsBeyond the sound tubes and EV jetson noises, Ford needs to really re-capture the power of the live axle and its ability to kill crowds at car meets.I don't think anyone would care as much if the Mustang Mach-E looked good, like Ford's take on a Taycan or something, but yeah it looks like a faggot crossover that you'd buy for your 37 year old wife who wants an EV but doesn't like Elon.
>>28985423>3 ton EV SUVs are actually based!hahahahahahahaha
I think I might buy one unironically
>>28985394Its honestly not a bad vehicle as far as soulless EV crossovers go. But it has no business being called a Mustang. If I was going to get an EV it would probably be one of these.
>>28985939it's not just Fordmany car companies are guilty of this sinlooking at Mitsubishi's new """Eclipse""" and Dodge trying to give the GLH name to a pigfat crossover
>>28986291But the Mach E could never look like the Taycan because it's not a sedan. In the grand scheme of things, it's truthfully one of the better looking electric midsize crossovers. The only bad thing about it is the mustang grille
It's perfectly in line with how the mustang started out: a pigfat pony car marketed towards women
>>28986728cool controversial and wrong opinion im sure youll get alot of replies
>>28985423at the end of the day its an ugly nanny filled potato
>>28985862lmao mach E outsold the gasser
>>28987416S650 is overcooked styling wise and overpriced, for sure. That being said, Mach-E's target audience is not even close to that of the Mustang. Who is cross-shopping the S650 and a Mach-E?
>>28985394It's just a wagon. Why would you want to be a trunklet?
>>28987502it's an suv/cuv and it shouldn't have mustang on it. it's like having a corvette pickup truck.
>>28985394Kinda late to the party, aren't you?
>>28985498What are you implying, that it would take you more than 2 minutes to write out that relatively small amount of text? Not really something I would admit to, personally.
>>28985423Literally the most cucked and pathetic vehicle of all time.
>>28985692>viewing a vehicle being low maintenance as a negative traitAre you retarded or something?
>>28985423It'll never be a mustang just like you'll never be a woman
>>28985423>it's f-faster!!
>>28985394i saw one of these recently and was incredibly confused
>>28987710>cucked and pathetic vehicleYes.>of all timeOK come on now... You know there's been much worse than this. I'd much rather drive this thing than a PT Cruiser or a Nissan Cube or a Geo Metro.
>>28987938>PT Cruiser>Geo Metrozoomer detected. PT cruiser was a breaking design when it was released and very well received, it just aged poorly.geo metros were incredibly reliable and got 55 mpg
>>28987954Reliability and fuel mileage were not part of the statement or my reply. Both were absolute cuckmobiles.
