40k ford interior>well gee maybe its newno the design is 10 years old as is the interior>maybe the engine is newwell, you can get a turbo, but it ain't new>but its a pickupcongrats you got scammed because you fell for a cutesy shape and a promise of macho shine
wait im wrong nearly 50k!To that we added Equipment Group 702A, a spendy, $5,495 grab bag of an option package including luxury features such as an acoustically insulted windshield and a premium Bang & Olufsen sound system, interior upgrades like heated front seats and steering wheel, rear USB ports, and dual-zone climate control, plus work-focused upgrades like a spray-in bedliner, LED bed lighting, and Ford’s Pro Trailer Backup and Hitch Assist systems. We also opted for Space White Metallic paint (which is gratis), an illuminated Ford badge ($510), rollup tonneau cover ($1,280), and a handful of other small odds and ends like a full-size spare and tailgate lock. The total out-the-door price for our Maverick Lobo is $46,980.
What A Shitpost!
>>28991600I hate the Maverick. I hate how lazy it is. I hate how people glaze it. It's a piece of shit. Ford put barely any effort in.
>>28991596>scammedIt's literally just the surrogate for the Focus/Escort/Aspire in Ford's lineup as they don't believe Americans actually want their sedans or hatchbacks anymore. It's the cheapest Ford you can actually buy.>inb4 you can't get it for muh MSRPIf you can't get a Maverick for $26k then you can't get an Escape for $28k, blame dealers for never carrying base models (you WILL pay the $50k average new car price through adjustments + packages you don't want and you WILL like it, goy).
>>28991614they don't want hatchbacks or wagons that are shitty and ford won't make something nice
>>28991597>luxury features >acoustically insulted windshield >premium Bang & Olufsen sound system, i>heated front seats and steering wheel, >rear USB ports, >dual-zone climate control, >spray-in bedliner, LED bed lighting, and Ford’s Pro Trailer Backup and Hitch Assist systems. Ok, why are you indignant that desirable features cost additional money? If it's too much for you, get the base model like the poorfag you are.
>>28991596New cars are a ripoff after Covid. Buy used.
>>28991596>OMG they didnt update the pLaTfOrM!!!
>>28992088yes, this exactly well, and they need to use nicer interior materials, the interior is pretty sparse and cheap
>>28992103Just need the Maverick King Ranch that costs $110k.Parts bin shitboxes are great. Things are already too fucking expensive.
>>28992103The interior is cheap? On a economy car? What the fuck? You mean a 28k car doesn't come with a Bentley interior? Unforgivable
>>28992231>economy car>47 kno, the 47k version still has a shitty interior
>>28992375It has the bones of a shitbox. If you're spending that kind of money why not just buy a better Ford truck? It's like complaining that there's no luxury Ford Tempo.
>>28992383>betterford escape/focus bones are 2017ranger bones date to 2011trugg is even worsegranted, I have a dirt road, I'll take the ranger, but not fun on a highway I bet
>>28992375Wtf you mean a trim level of a car is still the same car? I thought it I spent $120k on a GT500 they would give me a rolls Royce interior your telling me it's still a 35k mustang interior? Well at least i can rest assured that when i buy my 350k gt3rs i know it won't have the same interior as a base 80k 911
>>28991596Shutup fag
>buy car built after 1997>wtf its goyshityou and everyone else who does this deserves this hell.
>>28992525some cars use nicer interior materials for higher trimsnobody says rolls royce, just nicer than worst quality possible and designed in 2015
>>28992574The difference between a XLT and a Lariat is only 6k. How much of a nicer interior are you expecting for 6k?
>>28992579Anon, the interior is terrible at every price it is offered at. They made a shitty pickup and you glaze it cuz you are somehow brainwashed by them. They were ultra-lazy in designing the interior, did the bare minimum, used the cheapest materials, even Chevys are nicer. And why should they care? Idiots like you will still buy it. And they make more money with ultra-cheap interiors. Win-win for them.
>>28992583>the interior is terrible at every priceBrother. Listen to me. It's a cheap car. It has a cheap car interior. >even Chevys are nicer.Not the cheap ones. Look at the interior of a Trax. They use the same cheap cloth seats and the same hard plastic buttons.
>>28992598competing cars at similar prices have far nicer interiorsford and toyota are the worst trax is a class smaller and cheaper
>>28992583>They made a shitty pickup and you glaze it cuz you are somehow brainwashed by themThe glaze is deserved though BECAUSE it's a shitty pickup. It's got a bed and you can tow up to 4k for under 30k. That's awesome. If I wanted a nice interior I'd get an Accord or a Sonata but I want a bed and AWD and I want to tow a little and I don't want to spend $45k on a Ridgeline or a Ranger
>>28992627>under 30k most don't sell for that price, used pickups for 30k abound and you can get much nicer interiors it doesn't magically tow any more than a compact crossover
>>28992657>it doesn't magically tow any more than a compact crossoverFeel free to list which crossovers that start under 30k can tow 4k lbs. I'll even give you a 5k buffer on the price since technically you do need to option the package and awd on the maverick.
>>289927011. to get the optional 4k tow package you are paying way more than 30k2. most mavericks sold are not under 30k3. most people are not towing that much anyways and could just buy a used midsize pickup if they needed to >I'll even give you a 5k buffer on the price since technically you do need to option the package and awd on the maverick.sighAlso, Rav4 can tow 3500 lbs without any option packages except AWDJeep Cherokee can tow 4500 lbs though maybe not with the new 1.6 engine not sure about that, definitely once they replace it with the hurricane engine
>>28991596The interior looks great. It looks like a hansome square truck dash but without the power wheels for adults styling of nutrucks.
>>28992736>The interior looks great.
>>28992714>to get the optional 4k tow package you are paying way more than 30kLearn to read>>28992701>I'll even give you a 5k buffer on the price since technically you do need to option the package and awd on the maverick>most people are not towing that much anywaysI don't care what """most people""" do. I care what I do.>Rav4 can tow 3500 lbs without any option packages except AWDYes and that AWD Rav4 SE is $3k more expensive and guess what, you still get a really shitty interior. Wasn't that the original hill you were trying to die on, that other cars for the same price have better interiors?
>>28992804Rav4 (new) interior is nicer than Mavericktoyota interiors are trash, don't get me wrong, but still better than ford
>>28992827Yeah it's almost like cars have to be made in such a way that they balance performance, quality, and budget. If budget is fixed, then in order for one of the other factors to go up, the other one must go down.
>>28992849or, they are ripping people off to make extortionate profits and the cars are extremely low quality, inside and out, which is why all you have is >muh less than 30k>muh pickup bed>muh towing capacitybecause how it handles and drives is awful
>>28992911Yeah, that's how it works. You're not getting luxury car interior with sportscar handling and pickup truck utility for 30k. You could get something with a nicer interior but you're either paying more or losing utility.
>>28992391Old isn't necessarily bad. Last gen 4Runner ran for a long, long fucking time and was just fine, if you consider its purpose. I'd argue having something that's basically a known quantity and not going to have retarded engine metal shaving recalls is a Good Thing. My sister has a Santa Fe lease and that thing is 'decked out' but nothing makes sense and it has a totally overengineered Korean bullshit interior.
>>28992985>luxurythere's something in between ford and luxury >>28992997yes it is>it still runsnot well
>>28993004You'd literally be fine with a last gen 4Runner. They aren't fast or 'modern' but they are bulletproof. The Maverick isn't even in the same league as a used 4Runner, and you see that with pricing.If you want a luxurious, fast or sharp handling car you're in the totally wrong category.
>>28993016they drive like shit and lack many modern features
>>28993017Sure, I agree. Who cares? It's a truck. If you want a sports car, buy a sports car. Modern features? Need your Ford Edge™ McDonalds ads, please insert circumcised foreskin to drive, goy.
>>28993004>there's something in between ford and luxuryNot with a bed there isn't.
>>28992103Shut the fuck up, dipshit.You want single-year components because they need to be "updated" constantly?What are nicer materials? Burlwood and Brass?
>>28993043>there's no creativity, it's all black vinyl slopdamn kinda like every other sub30k economy car on the market
>>28993043Nothing stops you from grabbing your bedazzler and being as creative as you like. Why is it on the onus of some manufacturer to decorate your automobile?
