What can go 0-60 in 3.5 seconds? (besides a tesla)
>>28999280Whipple F-150.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYsndh7nLK8
Jap scrap rockets
>>289992813.4 seconds.5 years ago.
The stock market after donald tweets something?
>>28999295KEK
>>28999280Me when I step on the scale
>>28999280Muh dick.
>>28999280600cc supersport was able to do that since like 30 years ago and big boy 1 liter superbike does 2.5s, acceleration haven't improved much, a lot of the advancements went into handling, safety, efficiency, and emissions. I got to try the R1 before, 0-60mph in 2.5s, 0-100mph in 5, top of gear 1 is 90mph, it's stupid crazy
If picrel does 3.7, I have no doubt there are other cars doing 3.5 or below.
>>28999280That's an 11 second car, anon, there are millions of them.
>>28999280>>28999292>>28999381>it: people posting stock carsYou're all fags divorced from the pre-2008 culture.
>>28999419It looks like a printed paper magazine.Does this mean the internet hasn't always existed?
A Golf R with a tune. Maybe even without a tune idk
the ultimate driving machine does it in around 3.2-3.4 seconds
>>28999498and that's consistent, you can get as low as 2.9 seconds
>>28999443lol those things are slow af. They can't even pull away from a tuned F-150.
>>289992805 extra psi out of a Quadrifoglio
>>28999325>2.5sI've yet to see any bike best 3.1 on "real tires" on "real roads". No your sportmax on dusty dry 5 year old asphalt isn't getting anywhere near that.
my cb1000r was not a fast bike. only 140 hp atw (after tune and exahust). Even when it was stock it could do 3.5 or faster.
>>29000221Post a stock f150 beating my golf 8 r
>>29000230Your shit is not stock so why would the truck need to be? Your shit is quick, not fast. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4qKlSlvGwY
>>29000249Tune only TT 150s are 4.5/12.5s trucks at best and have that weightgrip and truck gearing advantage.It's genuinely unimpressive to see people brag about truck slow speed accel times. The aero starts brickwalling you guys after about 75mph.
>>28999280My 12r should. 1st gear takes me to 80
>>29000249Golflets must always cope. Quick but not fast is exactly how I would describe my mk7 when I had it. Did not like that car
>>29000256>12.5sMuch closer to 13.5 than any sub 13 if we're talking stock. Aero brick wall indeed.
>>29000256A whipple F-150 costs less than your tarted up Golf and you have no chance against one of those. I'd say spending $60k on a vehicle that runs 11's is more unimpressive lol. >>29000261GTI/R people are the worse. They're always "making 500hp/500tq at 1000rpm" but can't pull away from normal vehicles in the real world.
>>29000264Again, it's genuinely unimpressive to see mentally manlet coping baby turds talk about truck accel times.
>>28999323aids does that.
>>29000249you literally said a stock f150 gaps a tuned golf. I proved you wrong
>>29000337I said a tuned F-150 and I showed you proof of that...
>>29000553Your dumb street rat vid isn't proof of any claims.
>>29000556Cope however you want. Maybe buy a real Audi next time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=safkc6yVCnE
>>29000567Nigger without a build sheet and verifiable dyno result no fucking video is proof of anything. People lie.I'll tell you one truth:Kill yourself.
>>29000639This is peak displacement-deficiency psychosis. You’ve reached the "everyone is lying" stage of grief because your entire identity is tied to a car that just got humiliated by a work truck.
>>29000639You sound like a flat earther. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGwDmjuY8r4
Mine does under 3 seconds easily
15k used golf r and 2k stage2. 3.5 seconds is nothing these days, any awd can do it after a remap
>>28999280Latinas go 0-100 in under a second
>>28999280My wiener
>>28999280Remember when 3.5 was super car tier? Sub 4 seconds is just standard for decently high end sports cars these days.
>>29000920>>28999280anything with a 2.0 tsi and some elbow grease does it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQIu5tZ0vbQ
Almost any bike>>28999281>ooo what is that a whipple charger?american dumbass words always crack me up
Rihanna was super hot in this
>>28999419Don't you have some roofing to do?
>>290006480-60 is gay anyways. Show me a tuned F-150 hang with a golf R on a skid pad any day. You'd be rolling like a lawsuit explorer trying to keep up with that nigga in a turn.
>>29002912The R gets it's shit pushed in by a 10 year old Hellcat on a track. Don't bring up it's handling merits lol. While the truck may not do well on a skid pad it can tow something that can do well on a skid pad and will be more fun to drive than a pigfat Golf.
>>29002912If your chosen "sports car" is the sport trim of a fwd economy car, you may want to seek Canadian Healthcare
>>29003061>>29003067I do not own a Golf R, nor do I care about them. What I am trying to point out for goofball bench-racers is that a single fucking metric like 0-60 has very little bearing on how fun a total package is. Oh wow, a 700 horsepower Hellcat is faster on a track? I would hope so, it has more than twice the fucking horsepower and gobs of torque, but it's still a car neither of us (probably) own, on a hypothetical track? Who the fuck cares? Cars that handle are dope, straight-line-only cars are for 1 dimensional cavemen benchracers.
God she's ugly.
Just about any 600+cc bike in the last 36 years.On paper my old 250cc just about does it at 3.8-4.0.
>>29000920It’s not getting close>stage 9000 remap broAre you a paki
