>0-60 in 6.5 seconds (lmao)>4 cylinder (lmao) >tries to be sporty by being a coupe>1200kg pigfat>Finding clean examples is neigh impossible>sold as a momentum car to compensate for the it being one of the slowest sports cars on the market. >costs 30k AUD+Imagine buying a S13 in 2026pic unrelated.
>>29003859American S13s ran upper-8s 0-60...S13s cost less new than nu-86s inflation adjusted.Nu-86s came with Torsen LSDs standard, S13s were open diff.0-60 in 6.5 was pretty good in the tuner era. It's still the same level of acceleration.You faggots will come up with any reason to drive a CVT Nissan Rogue,
>>29003859>YEAH YOU GOTTA BUY A BIG V8 AND 0-60 TIMES AND DRAG RACING, YEAH I DRESS DRAG TOO WEARING MY SISTERS PANTIES HUCK HUCK. MY 350LBS ASS CANT FIT IN A GAYOTA SO I DRIVE REAL MURCIAN MUSCLE. CORNERS YOU SAY? CORNERS ARE FOR PUSSI.... AAK
>>29003868>S13s cost less new than nu-86s inflation adjusted.Meant more. As is demonstrably true.You pay less for an LSD manual with 200 hp than you would buying a 140hp 240sx new.
RbA (Raped by Alpine)
s13 was 1150kg and did 0-60 in like 5.5s and the quarter mile in 14.4s.
>>29003859>>29003868I had an s13 in 2006 as a first car, anons here glorify it but Marlboro Man knows the truth, it was a shit car. I'd be happy with the nu86 as a first car. You don't appreciate an s13 or nu86 for its acceleration or speed, it's for turning hard and lateral Gs
>>29003859>be OP>want car>can't afford carsourgrapes.jpeg >make thread complaining about car
>>29003859sounds like a bad deal on paper, but what exactly would you pick instead and why?
>>29003859Now if the pop up retrofit wasn't retarded expensive to buy in Europe and was legal in the first place.
>>29003859>neigh impossible
>>29003859i'd let a bunch of gross men do stuff to me for one tho.
>6.5 secondsThis is still relevant lol
>>29003859>he hasn't seen s15 prices
