Just got a dragyWhat performance metrics should I record to prove to /o/tards that my car is better than theirs, and therefore I am a better person
>>2900996260-130 is the current standard.
>>29009967accurate, anybody can game 0-60 with tire compound and patch at this point. actual vehicular engineering is determined at highway speed and above
>>29009967I don't understand why something like 30-80 isn't more commonThat's where 90% of usable street performance lives
>>29010050Because you could achieve that with just some aggressive gearing. 60-130 tests both your traction plus your alledgeded power. Nobody is building a 1000+hp care for "street performance". Go buy a EV if that's what you're after.
>>29010116Nigga my car is my daily driver, I'm not building no 1000 hp pile of boltsmy shit gonna be slow af 60-130, i need to manipulate the metrics to flex on /o/
>>29009962>0-60mph>0-100mph>1/4 mile
>>29010124I agree with this m/o/ron but I've only done runs to 130 a handful of times. it's just not that useful as an everyday metric of street performance.
>36-10-59-97Only metric that matters.
>>29010124>my shit gonna be slow af 60-130Then you got nothing to flex with. Nobody cares if your electric appliance does 0-60 in 3s when it does a 10 second 60-130.
>>29010351>10 second 60-13nigga that's like an m3 you should be required to post your driver's license and car's title to post on /o/
0-100-0 Tests your engine, transmission, brakes, probably aero, and suspension.
say when. There might be 2 people here with a faster car than me and that's only because they proved they had a Viper and the other guy had a Porch GT3RS.
>>29009962Drag my nuts across your face and tell me how it performs. Fgt.
>>290099620-60 is literally all that matters
>>29011873Are you the fag with the 14 second R?
My car is limited to 111 though.
>>29010116what is the current standard for quick with a 60-130?like the equivalent of a 4 second or less 0-60
>>29010240really the only metric that actually factors into my everyday driving is 5/10-60most of my street "races" are just going up against Karens in Macans and dudebros in tuned truggs trying to beat me to a merge from a traffic lightbecause I'm not the one to typically initiate I'm in bit of a rollout before seeing if they go for itthat makes the most important factor for my car how fast can it accelerate from a rollout
my car gets to 110 consistantly around 19s or less but does a kindof poor 14.5s 1/4.it's fast but it's dead on the line because I keep all-seasons on it.
>>29013073Fast is in the 3 second range. Quick is the 5 second range.
>>29013946get off the internet goofy ass lil nigga
>>29013958>Balljeet is starting to come to the realization that his Tesla isn't actually fast
>>29013961neither a gt3 rs nor a 911 turbo s do 60-130 in 5 seconds
>>29013966Yeah because they're slow in a straight line compared to other things out there.
>>29013974>turbo s >slow in a straight linelollmao even
>>29013978A Whipple F-150 walks them... I really hope this "enthusiast forum" knows that there are ways to have fast vehicles without spending $200k on a "fast" vehicle...
>>29013982LOL nigga the 911 is pissing on that shit by like 2 full seconds in the 1/4 mile
>>29013998Go be European somewhere else. There are plenty of 10 second (on the street) and quicker F-150's out there and those are the slow ones...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYsndh7nLK8
>>29014007still slower than a new turbo s bone stock
>>29014016You're comparing a $250k supercar to Jose's work truck on a sleepy tune... You're a financial and performance cuck at that point. The moral of the story is if you're going to "flex" you better be faster than a pickup truck.
>>29014029no the moral of the story is a turbo s isn't slow you dumb fuck and neither is any car with a 5 second 60-130 you bench racing retardalso nobody wants to drive some clapped out pickup truck nigga get a real job and stop daydreaming about some spicmobile
>>29013961dude a Tesla is one of the few cars that actually can do 60-130mph in 4 to 5 secondsI don't think you realize how few cars are able to do that without extensive tuning or supercar money8 seconds already beats 95% of the cars on the road
>>29009967>>29009985^^^Ricers1/4 mile is all that matters.
>>29010116Not just a ricer but a clown on top of it.Lol.
>>29013946>>29013958wait waitare you talking about kph or mph herebecause 5s 60-130MPH is ball crushingly fastfor kilometers per it's more reasonable
>>29014034A Turbo S is slow for the price. A $60k F-150 runs the same 1/4. You should stop daydreaming about shit you will never be able to afford. >>29014054Were talking MPH. A 900hp C7 Vette will do a sub 5 60-130mph. Those are definitely not uncommon and it doesn't take a lot of money to get there. Now keep in mind there are street cars that do it in under 3 seconds.
>>29014061I get that your dad works at nintendo but 900hp anything is not remotely common
>>29014238I see close to 50 700+hp cars a day. Maybe you live in some third world shithole?
>>29015058What cars and where do you live?
>>29015184Alberta. Lots of oil money and rich boomers. Stock vehicles we got...Ram TRX/Trackhawks/all the supercharged watermelon mobilesEscalade VRaptor RTesla PlaidBrown town is filled with Hummer EV'sHigher trim C8 CorvettesThere are no inspections here so aftermarket stuff can get pretty rowdy. I see people driving around with 'chutes and beadlocks.
>>29011920this but without launch control because you're not using that every single time
I’m not a drag nigga… but 60-130 is so fucking gay. Any retard can boost/cam/e85 his auto c6 corvette, throw some some Mickey Thomason’s street r’s, and act like some type of bad ass online 1/4 is the true test. You need to have car iq and skill to get a good time. You need to make sure your powerband/gearing is optimal. A well dialed in/driven 480whp c6 vette can murk an above average build putting down 600whpNot only that, you need to figure out tire pressures, launch methods, suspension. Add a staging brake, and banging gears if your a real driver ass nigga Again….Not only that, 1/4 mile trap speed is an amazing indicator of actual power going to the wheels. Fuck roll racing, fuck 60-130. If you’re gonna be a straight line guy, 1/4 takes knowledge, skill, and practice. Picrel is my straight line car. The mod combination, clutch choice, tire choice, launch method, shift points were all carefully selected for optimal performance.
>>29009967I don't think my car can even make it to 130aern't most people driving around on tires rated for like 102mph?
>>29016649My 30 y.o. “140 hp” Miata with 150k miles can make it to just a hair under 130 mph. 130 is about where “fast” begins.I thought most people rode 140mph tires.
>>29016649If a pickup truck can get to 160 that's a little sad. I'm pretty sure the average all season or even an A/T is rated for a lot more than 102mph. That's like a trailer tire speed rating. https://youtu.be/yc-LfKyK7fM?t=237
Lateral Gs.
>>29016661you already know i'm whippin that shit my nigga
>>29016652>130 is about where “fast” beginsI'm convinced this thread is a psyop to convince retards to wrap themselves around a tree trying to do 130 around a bend on the highwayor is this just what you people out in nevada do when your roads are all straight for miles and miles? bro there ain't a straight road anywhere near me
>>29016766it's no different than retards who think the average gamer has a 4070 ti or something
>>29016766I had typed out a few sentences about how it’s dangerous and nobody should do it, but then I figured someone would say *that* was a psyop or claim I’m a moralfag, whatever, don’t drive over the limit or your abilities, kids.
guys...i'm afraid i'm just... regular traffic
>>29016779Eh, it looks reasonable to me, decent, even.
>>29016779>Trap spd 104-105I suspect you could get your launch dialed in and make low 13s.
>>29010182Thiswhat the heck are these goobers talking about 17.5mph to 1488kph
>>29016791yeah i keep launch control at 2500 rpm cause FWD and i don't want to fuck my poor front axlejust figured out how to add custom measurements so i'm gonna start doing some rolls, 30-60, 30-80, 40-100, 60-130 if i can find a decent stretch of road, cause i'm not a huge fan of launching my car
>>29016800That's fair I guess. Is it a turbo? I'm guessing GTi. You could cheat some of those rolls with brake boosting depending on how the dragy system works, but that's not great for the car either.
>>29016804Elantra N
>>29016779also some old pulls from before dragy with the onboard data loggingnot sure the accuracy compared to dragy but numbers ranged from ~4.8 - 5.6 s 0-60 so there's definitely time to be gained from a good launch
>>29016857actually next time i'll just log with onboard and dragy and compare directly
>>29016779Very close to what i got.
>>29016972What car though?
