Around 650 new or refreshed cars were introduced in the first half of the year — a rate of almost four a day — according to data compiled by automotive platform Dongchedi. That contrasts with the US, where Bank of America Securities' annual Car Wars study for 2025 projected just 159 new model launches over the following four years, following a decade low of only 29 in 2024.https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-16/china-s-insane-car-market-flooded-with-hundreds-of-new-models?srnd=phx-hyperdrive
Thread already exists >>29022355
>>29022542>more is betterDude kys you faggot ricer, wrenchlet
>>29022558Yeah, more is better.
try getting a headlight assembly or a bumper for any one of those 650 cars in 5 years.
>>29022558Mexican schizo
>>29022898It's because youve never had shit kek
>>290225424 new piles of trash that will all be in land fills in 10 years with zero parts available, battery packs with less than 25% range remaining, cheap garbage
>>29022542Needs about 470 burgers.
>>29023042what's the difference between this and basically everything FCA and Stellantis has made or continues to make?
>>29022542>spare parts
>>29022542I think what you meant to say was the ccp keeps shitting out new bodykits for the same tesla derived skateboard underneath. I hate chinks so much,you wouldn’t even believe it
>>29023107>FCA and StellantisWhat the fuck is fca and stellantis?
>>29022542The better question is: why did the Chinese think that's a good thing?
>>29025281here you go, lil zoomie.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrysler
>>29025412Chinese companies do a type of real time focus testing on products. One parent company creates one product and then 20 different brands all sell the exact same thing with minor modifications, either small visual tweaks or maybe adding/removing a feature, different advertising techniques, names etc. Then they monitor sales and profits and figure out what things work best to sell that thing. If you had the time to look at every single one of these "new cars" they're probably at least 50% the same car made by the same people. The rest are start up companies buying parts from that company and then making a "new car" out of them
>>29025412chinks unironically think of cars as smartphones. They went from building the same red truck since 1950 to a new facelift every other year
>>29025412China's in a huge innovation boom right now and the emotional energy makes them willing to be resource inefficient in order to explore the entire range of possibilities. In a few decades they'll probably optimize their lineup down to nothing but a few cuckovers and pickup trucks in white, black, or silver; but as for now they're making a huge variety because they've never before had the production resources to make high-end finished goods and they're exploring the search space. Western Imperialism tries to keep Turdies to producing nothing but parts and raw materials, leaving them dependent on white people to sell them finished goods. But we used Chinese labor to make so many of our parts that we left them needing only a small step to putting them all together for themselves, and they went and took that step and now their pent-up creativity is exploding.
>>29025473they'll likely consolidate their offerings. chinese government subsidizes companies and commands them to compete. eventually their government phases out subsidies for the losers. what you're seeing is what free market capitalism claims to produce (freedom of choice, innovation, etc.) but never does.
>>29025473>>29025548and they might even be beating us with sensibility of regulations. https://www.npr.org/2026/02/03/nx-s1-5698224/china-electric-car-door-handles
>>29025562the EU has set out to eliminate vehicular homicide by 2050.Do you have any idea what this means for regulations? >You wont be driving and you will be happycars will be so shitty that nobody wants a new one anymore. And the us and uk are adopting most of that bullshit too
>>29022898>>29022542Quantity < Quality
>>29025562They're Communists and actually believe that the entirety of the private/government system should benefit the commune. See how they've banned new skyscrapers over 500m as being ridiculously inefficient, anything over 250m requires review, and small cities can't approve anything over 150m. The CCP looked at the capitalist excess that served nothing but the egos of the buyers and said, "Buy something more sensible and put the saved money towards something that's actually useful."
>>29025580>See how they've banned new skyscrapers over 500mIt makes sense for China because many developers still have the thirdie mentality that tall = better (perfectly seen in the richest third world country the UAE). Also living in high rise buildings is a soul crushing experience.
>>29022959you've never has sex, fag
