Cars are a ton of fun as collector's items, but should we limit their use on public streets? They seem dangerous
what are the chances his parents are related lmao
Ban assault niggers.
>>29024540please try to stay on topic
>>29024540Relatively low, since he's white and consanguineous marries is practiced disproportionately in brown countries, but what does that have to do with the subject?
>>29024544You first /n/igger
>>29024558This thread is about the place of automobiles in public. If you'd rather not discuss that I welcome you to browse other threads.
>>29024538>limit their use on public streets?No. Just make it extremely hard to obtain a driver's license.
>>29024569Making it hard to obtain ID has been criticized in the past as being racist, though. Is that really preferable?
>>29024569Here in India we limit who can own cars
>>29024570Yes. >>29024571Cool. Good for you but you guys are like what, 1 and something billion people? What's the criteria?
>>29024538>should we limit their useYou got a mouse in your pocket?
>>29024538>should we limit their use on public streets?no, we should limit the people we give licenses tothis isn't even a race thing, middle age WASP wine moms are some of the worst drivers on the road
>>29024570Hand out freely obtainable govt ID cards, it doesn't have to be a drivers license.
>>29024582>this isn't even a race thing,oh thank goodness
>>29024538Nah, just move being retarded up to like 90 IQ. They're not allowed to drive, do long term financial contracts, buy guns, give consent for sex, and lot of other things. They are still allowed to vote, but we can fix that.
>>29024585It needs to be said with such a blatantly race baiting OP
>>29024538Ban niggers, women, and foreigners from driving and there are no problems.
>>29024570>hard to obtain IDNo such thing. A non-drivers license state ID cots no more than a drivers license and low income minorities can literally get one for FREE.
>>29027605When he says>IDand that "it" is hard to obtain, he's not talking about wielding the 2x3 inch plactic card.He talking about the state-issued privilege/requirement to legally perform the act of driving a car on federally funded roads.He's saying "make it hard" is to "make the test you have to pass more difficult/higher standard."
>>29024575Can you poo in loo?
Ultimately, who is it most dangerous to?>EVERYONE, Anon!>Everyone is equally likely to die!I disagree. Your grandmother in a nursing home will never drive again. Her "getting into an accident" won't happen, really.Then you've got the opposite end (of drive frequency) and professional drivers driving MILLIONS more miles than the average, every day, and barely ANY of them get into a car accident. They're actually really good at driving.And then you have teens and drunks and idiots and criminals and no-licensed-thieves... they get into accidents a lot. They get into LETHAL accidents, too, on average. They're killing themselves.I can admit that it's dangerous to have them on the road (for me or anyone), and that if they never drove it would be safer, but...... they pay fines and tickets out-the-wazoo, pay 10 times the taxes I do, locate mostly in enormous cities (I don't live in a city), and basically suffer Hell for their "right" to drive. And, eventually, it kills them. They basically fund my roads for me (by about 80%), afford their own fate, and pay the price for their poor choices. I simply avoid them, both in location and time-of-day.