>>29043830Could have atleast posted one in a good colour
>>29043837
>>29043822
>>29043902F430 has a cleaner design
>>29043826>>29043830>>29043837>>29043840completely undesirable eggshit soap bars
>>29043840WOW! Truly timeless design! definitely not a mediocre blob of its era you’ve been suckered into “liking” because of the badge.
>>29043902>>29043911they both look dated.the v12 ferraris stayed swoopy but the mid engine ferraris changed out of that early design language way too fast
>>29043995Slop
>>29044000Your mom guzzles my slop
>>29043822car came out a decade ago and still looks like it could fit right in with everything else being produced.
>>29044013About as timeless as a pizza at a weight watchers convention
>>29044037Can't handle the real UDM?SAD!
>>29044029Looks like someone grafted the rear end off a bigger model onto the back of it.
>>29044064poor bastard doesn't know what flying buttresses are.
>>29044074They belong on cathedrals, not performance cars
>>29043822>mcdonalds strutsI'll let it slide this thing is somewhat classy>>29043826Based>>29043902Based>>29043911Ricer>>29043926Based
>>29043966"Timeless" doesn't mean the design looks contemporary
Damn.
>>29044013
>>29045391Kek
>>29044171>timeless car designs>hurr must try to force my shitty gay meme even when it doesn't remotely apply to the topicYou are a loser and should get a life.
>>29043822911s are so fucking boring
>>29043822>timelessnot like we had a choice
>>29045317I saw one of these for sale on marketplace for the price of a new car and wondered who this cruella deville/Adams family mf was who lives in my community and is goose stepping around his living room waiting to sell this thing
>>29045541This. Same as BMW. Only porschefags say otherwise
>>29043928YES
What a fucking tasteless thread, except for the SM and RX7
>>29045716>posts nothing to avoid judgment
>>29045716Honestly this thread fucking sucks. What is it with zoomers and these generic regular ass traffic blobs.
I'm gonna start fixing this thread so you zoomers know what a good looking car looks like.
>>29045800>>29045801Such fucking normie taste for a ""car enthusiast:""
This one's a bit debatable. Its a good looking car but I wouldnt say its timeless. Looks very 90s.
>>29045810>UH AKSHULALY SAAR IT NEEDS TO BE A SHITBOX NOBODY CARES ABOUT FOR YOU TO BE A REAL CAR ENTHUSIAST.You're brown. I'm using these as examples. I really dont give a shit about this thread but seeing blobs from the 90s and early 2000s in a "timeless" car design thread makes me want to vomit in my mouth. Also I bet you dont even know what that second car is without googling it.
>>29045813Ive been watching you be a clown on this board for over a decade, nothing has changed
>>29045817Here's your (You) as a reward for your service.
>>29045818ThanksAnyway, ill get the thread back on topic
>>29045823Ill never forgetOwning pic related for a bit (2000, black), a pair of normie boomer types at a gas station asked me if it was a brand new benz, and I had to tell them it was over 40 years old design wise
>>29045829This is the same issue as >>29045812Its not that its a bad looking car, but i wouldnt say this is timeless. If it was released today people would be like why the fuck are the headlights so big. It looks extremely dated and stuck in the 90s/80s.>>29045827Objectively shit taste.
Unforgettable!
>>29045829>>29045830You're thinking about this wrong, not surprising because you're a goofy retard. You cant just use "well if it came out today" as your only metric because everything today looks retarded, but picking your favorite videogame cover art cars from the 2000s definitely isnt indicative of "timelessness" either The r129, vantage and pic related share the distinction of being the career favorites of their designers, while those designers were penning the best eras of their relative marques. Thats a good quality to have.Maybe the v8 vantage less so, that was based on the DB9 which was fiskers actual favorite.
>>29045831Don't look at the rear door roof line, Volvo was too lazy to make proper doors for estate models
>>29045835Haha, wow
>>29045823This is objectively ugly. I don't care that it was the favorite car some boomer designed. I don't find the merc nice looking either. Are you 50+?
>>29045837Your input is worthlessSupport your claim or post a counter example
>>29045833Timeless means the design has survived the test of time. If I look at a car and my first thought is "that dude probably paid $5000 on some buy now pay later lot to relive his peaked in highschool days" thats not a timeless design. If the design has gaudy elements that are only reminiscent of that era, its not a timeless design. Maybe it was good looking for that era, maybe its nostalgic but that doesnt make it timeless.
>>29045839>Timeless means the design has survived the test of timeI tend to think of that meaning the car will look good forever, regardless of age and how automotive trends change. Im 4/4 on that itt but the carerra GT is also a baby-mode cop out contribution to this discussion because its so easy to point at as a timeless design
>>29045839>mid 2000s audi is gaudy and 'peaked in high school'You are the most retarded nigger to ever post on this board Pic related was one of audis contemporaries in that era, and its actually what you're describing. Audis biggest crime before 2015ish was looking too 'normal' and understated
>>29045838You're a boomer/gen x based on the cars you think look cool lmao
>>29044002My nigga
Inb4 slowfag and poorfag hate
>>29045873Good one>>29045861>boomer/gen xI was born in 1995
>>29043831Tremendously based. The best Mercedes sedan design ever
Love c140
>>29045903Love audi
This whole thread can be simply just various iterations of the 911.
>"timeless designs">half the replies are sports cars that are representatives of the decade they were made in and stick out in modern day because of their dated designbig stupid
>>29045946So your idea of timeless is a modern car?
>>29045946Lets really think about what you're saying hereEvery car is a representative of the time it was made in. No shit. Everything that isnt a modern car sticks out in a modern era because modern cars are giant fish mouth grills, fat beltines, bulbous front ends, led light bars and tiny slit lighting assemblies. If your idea of a timeless car is "a car where you cant tell when it was made" you are retarded and thinking of the question entirely wrong. The question needs to be framed around the cars beauty relative to its age. The only real question you need to ask is "did it look good then, and will it look good forever," and for most of the cars posted itt so far the answer is yes
>>29045949"Timeless design" would imply that the car would fit in at any era, regardless of age. Somebody posted the James Bond Aston Martin earlier, which is a car that almost functions as an emblem of the 60's. This would not be a timeless design.
>>29045957>thinking of the question entirely wrongthen don't use the word "timeless." i'm not the retard here just because i know the definition of the term and you're upset about that.
>>29045969Because you're hyperautistic and incapable of understanding nuance. Timeless in this context means its beautiful forever. It doesnt mean it exists beyond time or cant be placed as originating from a particular time because thats completely retarded.
>>29045969You actually don't
>>29045963>would imply that the car would fit in at any era, regardless of ageNo car exists that fits this criteria. Thats why using "timeless" in this context is retarded.
>>29045975>hyperautistic and incapable of understanding nuanceChanging the definition of a word to fit your needs isn't nuance, it's incorrect. My point still stands, if you are using a word for a purpose other than its definition, then you're using it incorrectly.>b-b-but in this contextdoesn't matter, context doesn't change the definition in this case just because you want it to. >>29045982>well, it's okay to use the wrong word because nothing fits it anywayretard. watching /o/ become populated by 80iq facebook boomers has really been something, and you morons are definitely indicative of it.
>>29043822The 2000s were the golden age for supercars.
>>29045990>words only have one usage and definition because I said soLike I said, hyperautistic Lets see you prove your point. Post a car that can be sat aside examples from 1890 all the way to 2026 that looks like it could have been released in any year in between.Go ahead, ill wait. Until then stfu because you're literally too retarded to even participate itt.
>>29045990
>>29045946>>29045963ESL fuck. Timeless means it's a nice design regardless of its age.
>>29045995>prove my point for me so that i can be right, otherwise you're a retard!You have a lot of other problems that don't end with you being stupid. I imagine your personal life suffers quite a bit as a result of this. Sad >>29045998So you're agreeing with me? I would assume so, because that's essentially what I've been saying the whole time. A 69 Charger for example, is affected by both the process of time passing and changes in fashion because the design has aged out and it doesn't measure up to any standards of today.
>>29046004>more retard babble
>>29046004No, John. You are the brainlets.
>>29045857Look at that audi picture. That shit has not aged well at all. Godawful chrome and silver trim, fuckhuge nigger wheels that look like they belong on a 2000s mustang, the grill is completely oversized and doesnt fit the body lines at all. It looks like a 10 thousand dollar dealership special for some broccoli head zoomer to impress his highschool friends with. Thats objectively not a timeless design you fucking retard regardless what you think. Its literally the embodiment of "black shiny plastic" disposable vehicle.
>>29046032NahThe 8.5 is the best looking car audi has made this century. Get a blackout package if you dont like chrome. You have terrible taste now and you always have, obsessed with niggers and zoomers.
>>29046035My bad, posted the censored one on accident
>>29046038Why’d they put a lift-kit on it?
>>29046050I think it has a better factory stance that most cars ive ever seen personally, at least in rs5 trim with the rotor wheels
>>29046055That isn’t the same example as >>29046038Why is the one with black trim on stilts?
>>29046057I don't see it. Ride height looks the same between both to me.
>>29046060?It’s quite obviously HIGHer
>>29046064No its not. Its the reflections (or lack of them) obscuring the flat rim of the front fender making it look higher. If you look at the rear of both cars they're exactly the same.
goddamn audis are so BORING
>>29046072Except the back is HIGHer too>>29046055This is too high already in the first place; it looks like it’s on stilts
>>29046077Its not. The blue one may have a 10 or 15mm spacer on it, but they're the same ride height.
>>29046080They’re both too HIGH regardlessAnd putting fucking spacers on without MODIFYING the suspension is rice as fuck
>>29046083Modifying cars is cringe. Just buy a good one and it wont need mods.
>modify suspensionlmaos just load some fat latinas in the back esewill be scraping the floor in no times flatis how you say not ricer
>>29046086The only cars that are perfect out have the box are Sacco era Benzes and STRAIGHT 6 E39s THOUGHEasiest way to tell if someone is a poser and not a True Enthusiast is they’re still running the fuckin beancounter-approved lift-kit
>>29046094I actually agree that sacco era benzs and i6 e39s are basically perfect out of the box, but I think the same of de silva era audis
>>29046095If they’re perfect out have the box why do they need MODIFICATIONS to bring them back to the Designers’ True Vision?Surely they didn’t Design them to have a lift-kit or spacers installed afterwards
>>29046102They dont need mods. They look fine.
A car less than 20 years old cannot be considered timeless because it has yet to withstand the test of time.>wheelgap schizo is hereoh good, the thread is over anyway
>>29046109How did you determine 20 years as the minimum amount of time that needs to pass before you can assign "timeless" as a quality? What changes on the 7,300th day that wasnt true on the 7,299th day?
>>29046113You're being overly literal. Would it be better if I had said ~20-30 years?
>>29046120Well yeah im autistic but probably. I disagree with your perspective but I think its a more coherent if you're not assigning an arbitrary hard age limit as a qualifier. Personally I think you need about a decade to assess if a car can pass that test; thats enough time to seperate a car visually from whatever the trends are at the time its made.
>>29046106Why do they both look like they’re on stilts then?
>>29046125Why is your post spacing on stilts? Fix your text gaps before you talk to me.
>>29046129Kek fucking pussy conformistIf those cars are perfect out have the box, why do they need MODIFCATIONS to get rid have the hilariously HUGE lift-kit placed on there to apesde the old guys that actually buy cars?
>>29046133The cars you like come on stilts so they need to be lowered to look good and sit right. Mine don't.
>>29046038>>29046055>fake bullshit front splitter>fake bullshit rear diffuser>headlights look like a penis>nigger wheelsWhat part of that is timeless to you. It looks like a jungle monkey special. Even more so blacked out.
>>29046143>the self declared preeminent certifier of automotive "timelessness" is obsessed with niggers and penises
>>29046142See >>29046125
this fatboy is the GOAT mercedes design, and you know im right
>>29046208It was a high watermark and Mercedes have been getting worse ever since.
>>29046208No lies detectedThe amg gt and sls are kinda nice tho
Amg gtr are pretty nice looking. I only see boomers driving them though
>>29046208Pre facelift R230 was better looking
>>29046237Dunno if it fits this thread but I quite enjoy the CL class of this era
>>29046249At high-school some fat trash chick got dropped off in a CL600 of this gen. It definitely made her more attractive, her dad must have been into bad shit.
>>29046208Finally a non-gay Merc posted
>>29046249big comfy coupesits hard to make them look ugly
>>29043822Why did burgundy go out of fashion? It's such a classy color.
>>29046636looks like shit when people don't take really good care of it, much like other paint colors but a little bit moreso with burgundy
>>29045802I firmly believe Honda could put the S2000 back in production with zero changes and very few people would be able to tell it is a 27 year old design
>>29043822for me its the 2 door berlinetta no automobile gets me harder than something with a long bonnet 2 doors and a short assand 250 is the cream of the crop
>>29050647Shelby Daytona clears
>>29050680no just no
>>29050690sorry anon, those fat rear tires make me feel funny
>>29050700it just doesnt have the curves of the ferrari.
>>29045994that's it, right there, the best looking car ever made
>>29045492This but minus the trailer park lift
>>29050994that's about as short as anything gets with a solid front axle, the oversize tires are what you see
>>29050992If only Ford had put a V8 in that thing...
