Car and Driver did their 2026 0-150-0 test.
2023 results.Link to both articles:https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a73414330/0-150-0-speed-test-2026/https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a45765297/0-150-0-mph-speed-test-2023/
great
>>29061176If it includes some lame ass cheat 1ft rollout it's fake and gay.
How do they stop at 150 exactly
>>29061176the ZR1X is insane. basically a hypercar beater when the corvette has always been a super car beater.
>>29061199Slam the brake pedal. ABS, baby.
Hail America, hail GM, hail the Corvette
>>29061176Why is 100-150 so slow for the scatty? It has a great 0-60.
>>29061176The GodMachine does it again
>>29061176i will never own any of those cars so brother i am not caring
I would like to see the 911 turbo and the ZR1 in a 1/4 mile drag race. I bet that would be super close, their 0-60 is nearly identical.
>>29061290the corvette would win. it has way more power, and a hybrid system that is vastly superior to the mechanical AWD in the 911.
>>29061283It's the size of a barn and shaped like one too.
>>29061176Why an Elantra N?
>>29061283Wind resistance, it's likely got a lot more drag than things like corvette, 911, etc.Also, the gearing is probably not great for those speeds. I'm thinking it's likely that the lower gears are sized for good acceleration at the bottom but the top gear/overdrive is super long after that.
>>29061283I agree with the other guy, probably the aero really holds it back at high speed. The scat pack is "only" in the 500's for horsepower too. Compare to the corvette, which I think is combined 1200 horse, 1060 horses from the engine, almost double what the charger outputs
>>29061283>>29061321>>29061337What's interesting is that the old Challenger Scat Pack with 485 HP does 0-150 mph in 25.2 seconds. Despite the new Charger Scat Pack having 550 HP, it's 5.7 seconds slower.
>>29061326Need to have a slow normie car on there for perspective. Otherwise some people may not be able to relate to the numbers.
>>29061346>2026 charger scat pack 4800 pounds>2016 challenger scat pack 4000 poundsPIGGY PIGGY PIGGY
>>29061326if you read the article it says they invited "everyone you could think of" i.e. manufacturers to send cars and these are the cars picked by the manufacturers
>driving at 150 mph in something built by DodgeI would not be this willing to die just for the sake of getting some numbers to compare between cars.
>>29061180the fuck happened to the type r vs the EN?
>>29061356Who cares? One car took 5 more seconds to get to a speed that neither car should be driven at.
>>29061359yeah but I thought type r was the holy grail for fwd
>>29061360It is. But it's more focused on things like grip, cornering stability, etc. I doubt either manufacturer when designing those cars ever thought "we need to make this get to 150mph faster".
>>290613482016 Challenger SP is 4,232 lbs.2026 Charger SP is 4,816 lbs.However that largely only effects the launch. Once you get going weight doesn't matter much.
>>29061356Gearing, in all likelihood
>>29061213Yurocucks BTFOThey'are entire cuntinent has been made OBSOLETE
N-chads WW@
>stock car comparisonswhen did car enthusiasts become this faggy?
RbBugatti and chink EVs
>>29061176shit the new scat pack is slow wtf
>>29061701stock car racing was a thing for decades>win on sunday, sell on monday
>>29061176>Ioniq 5 curbstomps the ElantraHoly fuck, has anyone checked to see if Elantracel's ok?
>>29061176I've never considered buying any of these cars, who is his list for?
>>29061700The elantra n is slow as shit and the ioniq 5 is a fucking EV.
>>29061214Yeah but what if they start stopping at 151 mph? I mean we're talking tenths of a second mattering in the ranking
>>29061938Then they run it again.>If the driver waited until they saw 150 mph on the display, the vehicle would be well past that speed by the time they hit the brakes. Runs below 150 mph were disqualified, as managing testing editor David Beard found to his great disappointment when he came back from one session having achieved a speed of 149.99 mph.>“You totally had to anticipate it,” says technical editor Mike Sutton. “In the quicker cars especially, we were starting the stop sequence when the speed display crested 147 mph. You’ve got your foot hovering over the brake pedal. In the time it takes your brain to make that connection, your foot to move and hit the pedal, and the brakes to engage meaningful deceleration, you’ve passed 150.”
>>29061176I honestly think the biggest differentiator is just tires. People underestimate how much performance of better Tire gets you. I don't know why it's so difficult to explain to people that tire compounds change cars drastically.
>>29062029>don't know why it's so difficult to explain to people that tire compounds change cars drastically.People only buy tires when they have to, they don't buy them for fun or experimentation
>>29062052Has never tracked his car.
>>29062029Yes I'm sure an RS6 comes with chinese all seasons. That's totally it. And I'm sure the elantra with 276 hp taking 36.7 seconds to reach 150 mph is also because of tires.
The two funniest things here are:1) Corvette rapes Porsche 2) RS6 is slower than a Bentley
>>29061283Aerodynamics. It’s why it’s still rare that stuff cracks 200 legitimately, you need a long runway or straight road and loads of power and a slippy car
>muh N hatecope. it’s one of the best road cars to actually have fun on the market currently
>>29061176>comparing the Elantra N to a fucking Corvette, 911, M2 CS and RS6huh?
>>29062193it gives you context for their speedI just wish they had tested a Wrangler too
>>29062152>2) RS6 is slower than a BentleyTop of the line sports GT faster than an estate is shocking to you?
>>29062211RS6 is more than just "an estate" you disingenuous cum gargler.
>>29062211>>29062238RS6 is faster to 60 and to 100, I don't think it's shocking that the Bentley takes over from 100 to 150. It also slows down half a second faster from 150 to 0.
>>29061700lol... are you under the impression that the data for that car on this chart is to be considered good in some way?
>>29062193You need to have a slow pos on the list for a lot of people to be able to relate the other cars' numbers to something they've actually experienced.
>>29061176>>29061180>mogs the CTR again
>>29061176How do these compare to a $10k liter bike?
Half those cars complete the test quicker than it takes my car to do 0 to 60
>>29062390Brother you got rinsed by a boxy RC car
>>29062488Same
>>29062497your car wasn't even considered worthy of inclusion
>meanwhile a pigfat family sedan is right up there with the latest and greatest hyperubermega sports cars as well as one trick pony EV shitThe humble M5 ladies and gentlemen. Doing all the same stuff but in a sensible way while also massaging your ass cheeks
