[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/o/ - Auto

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1759488934979682.jpg (187 KB, 1430x1283)
187 KB JPG
https://www.wsj.com/business/autos/carmakers-have-a-new-idea-to-boost-ev-range-add-a-gas-engine-16bbcc34

They finally did the 10+ year old meme. I never understood why they never did it. Simply put a generator on a car built in.

How the actual fuck did it take until almost 2027 to do this. HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE HUMANS?

It really boggles the mind. ai can't come save us from ourselves soon enuf
>>
File: 1772018611124414.png (521 KB, 720x575)
521 KB PNG
>>29080795
i guess the main problem was human insisting to be 100% electric so they could pretend they were green
>>
File: 1771966609873630.jpg (90 KB, 504x504)
90 KB JPG
I always thought electric cars were cool but never understood the insistence of 100% electric and hybrid seems dumb too.

Generators always seems logical to me.
>>
ITT: right wing chuds spouting uninformed nonsense
>>
>>29080824
wow a derailment technique i love leftypol
>>
N
>>
I
>>
File: battery prices.jpg (29 KB, 856x404)
29 KB JPG
>>29080795
>They finally did the 10+ year old meme
BMW i3 REX did this 10 years ago. The driveline is shit and batteries are dropping so fast in price anyways. Keep up tourist.
>>
I'm sick of the journalism bullshit term "range anxiety" as if a car buyer is insecure about their penis or something and it's not the evs across the board have at best 60% of the range of an equivalent gas model in perfect conditions.
If I can't comfortably make it to my destination on one full charge an EV requires me to pay for a hotel room whereas the gas car takes 5 minutes to get back on the road
>>
>>29081306
You need a hotel room for a 30min charge?
If I take a piss and get a coffee, the charging is finished before Im ready to drive again.
It's not like you have to watch the electrons flow into your battery...
>>
>>29080809
I like how people think pic related is some kind of an own. Even if the total amount of pollution is the same, it's still a net positive to move it away from where people live and breathe.
>>
>>29081353
>30 minutes to piss and coffee in the middle of a long drive
>>
>>29081456
It's also false in that even the worst sources of electricity still generate less pollution than ICE car. Reminder that the ICE has a waste percentage of 70% of all gas you pour into it. 70% is just heat. Atleast almost all gas used as electricity becomes electricity.
>>
>>29081288
Chevrolet Bolt also did it in 2011. It's telling that people think it's a new idea due to how irrelevant it was in the past decade. Same for hydrogen fuel cells that also promise longer range and quick refills. Nobody actually wants that stuff.
>>
>>29081456
>away from where people live and breathe.

That's exactly like saying to someone pissing in the pool next to you to swim to the other side of the pool and piss there. It's the same pool.
>>
>>29081306
this
i don't buy cars that get single digit mpg why would i buy an ev that has half the range of my gasoline car?
>>
>>29080795
So, they are turning EVs into hybrids basically? lol
>>
>>29081611
ev = 100% electric

hybrid or phev = wheels driven by gas motor + electric motors

erev = wheels driven by electric only + gas generator

this paywalled, the archive link isnt working for some reason
>>
It's not a new idea. China already has tons of range extended evs.
>>
>>29081634
yeah, chevy volt did it like someone said earlier too.

But, for some strange reason the industry was digging their heels in to not do it again.

It's just bizarre.
>>
>>29081585
>why would i buy an ev that has half the range of my gasoline car?
Your high mpg shitbox is as fraction as nice and comfortable to drive as an EV. And never needing to visit a gas station to give money to arab pedos is a luxury.
>>
>>29081578
No, it's not exactly like that
>>
>>29081649
Because they didn't sell, just like FCEV. Parallel PHEV are doing a bit better but are still niche. Pure BEV are enough for the people interested in EV seeing as the ranges are enough for their daily needs and chargers available everywhere. Meanwhile the people insisting they drive megametres every week still buy pure ICE or hybrids without charger because plugging their cars is abhorrent for them.
>>
>>29081578
And when it is a lake?
>>
File: this my exit.webm (2.88 MB, 1920x1080)
2.88 MB
2.88 MB WEBM
>>29081634
>China
>>
>>29081578
Except if you are on the other sides of the pool, his piss will stay around him
>>
>>29081812
>>29081737

But, it's not piss is it? It's poison. Do you want poison in your lake or ocean? Does it matter where it's released? It will get to you eventually.
>>
>>29081817
would you rather have highly concentrated poison right next to you, or highly diluted poison everywhere?
the process which produces the diluted poison also generates less overall.
>>
File: 1762251450560081.png (422 KB, 1200x960)
422 KB PNG
>>29081820
>would you rather have highly concentrated poison right next to you, or highly diluted poison everywhere?
>the process which produces the diluted poison also generates less overall.

My point is that moving pollution from one side of the world to the other isn't solving a problem. It's changing who is affected. And I guess if it only hurts brown people the problem is solved. So let's keep doing it.
>>
>>29081836
You're not just moving the pollution, you're also creating less of it by virtue of using highly efficient power plants that can also do more to clean up their emissions.
>>
>>29081836
Nice misinfographic. I like how it's worded to mislead the reader by subtly hiding the real claim inside what looks like a grammatical error, instead of explicitly calling out sulphur oxides, which is a complete straw man argument when it comes to cars.

>>29080809
well-to-wheel efficiency of gas is like 15% vs 25% for an EV.
>>
>>29081836
>It's changing who is affected.
Who lives next to a power plant? Certainly less than people live, work and breath inside cities.
>>
>>29080809
This but let's reframe it
The real problem with humans is their performative nature
>>
>>29080795
>Simply put a generator on a car built in.
Isn't this what Nissan's e-Power deal is all about?
>>
Like with most things in the EV world, Alan Cocconi perfected this in the 90s only for it to be thrown away until some auto manufacturer "invents" it again 30 years later (see also vehicle to grid). I also have blueprints for a series hybrid from the 1970s. This is old hat, especially if you consider the Volt could reasonably be called a series hybrid, news is just being retarded as usual.
>>
>>29082407
e-power is a series hybrid but you have no way to charge the battery aside from the engine so it's not a real range extender. Hybrids themselves have been used as far back as WW1.
>>
>>29080795
>Not using this one
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=esLw_-NHeLc
>>
>>29080795
A gas generator can fully charge an EV battery on 1-2 gallons of gas, it just takes like 16 hours. But you get more efficient mileage than a gas engine alone.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.