VW dropped this near production concept recently and no one is talking about it, 6.89 kWh/100 km consumption.This is what EVs should be. Amazing what some aero mods can achieve to a regular electric polo.
>>29093021>6.89 kWh/100 kmBruh nobody knows what this shit means
They also sacrificed the central iPad to achieve that efficiency.
>>29093021how come shrouded fenders never caught on? modern evs will bend heaven and earth for aerodynamics yet they rarely cover the rear wheels.
>>29093036because it makes it more difficult for the owner to inspect and service the tires. general body shape + smooth underbody yields the biggest gains anyway.
Cool will it save enough money to offset having to replace it when the lease ends?
>>29093047Kek
>>29093036My guess is that they look too weird and outlandish. They also create some complexity in manufactoring and for consumer to deal with. The efficiency benefits haven't been justified for it. Quite common today to see fully covered hub cabs on EVs which is the easier approach.
>>29093021Reminds me of this one I saw yesterday.What is it by the way?
>>290930611st gen Honda Insight
>>29093046>general body shape + smooth underbody yields the biggest gains anyway.That's pretty much it. Covering rear fenders really also works best with cars that have so many efficiency design considerations where they're trying to go 150+ mpg.
>>29093021Some guy on tiktok made a 100mpg car and it's literally just that. They probably copied his design. I think his was a Prius but I could be wrong, some hybrid sedan but he got it up to 90-100mpg with just tape and paper mache mods to alter the shape. Basically got rid of all air resistance and added fins on the back.Yeah good efficiency is possible when your car is just a dildo going through the air.
>>29093046Make the fender covers pop open.They won't, to purposely make the tires not self-servicable...
>>29093090>They probably copied his design.lol no it's been well known for a while that this is what you need to achieve peak efficiency. hypermilers have been doing this for years.
>>290930281 liter petrol is 9kwhSub 1l car
>>29093021Space things were popular like 50 years ago bruh.
>>29093021>The XL1 is back>as an EV this timeI'm still a bit salty that we never got the XL Sport as a production car, not even a limited run, that thing would've been fuckin sweet.
>>29093180>is back>as an EV
>>29093021how much range would this have? more than 500mi?
>>29093290It has a 55 kWh battery so with 6.89 kWh/100km you should get 800km or 500 miles.
It was so close to perfection. I'd rather have slightly less efficiency and something that looks nice too.
EVs are ideal coupes. Low, slim bodies with declining roofline all makes aerodynamics optimal. It's a shame all we get are raised boxy crossovers with gigahuge batteries.
>>29093487>illuminated logo>light band>looks niceAnd let's not forget the trouble of hidden door handles.
>>29093492>posts a fastback sedan
>>29093241It was a diesel electric powertrain, not much of value was lost unless you're a train autist
>>29093494There are no EV coupes. Ioniq 6 is also really efficient and almost a coupe in shape. It's not a fastback.
Efficiency is sort of a meme with EVs. The ideal body shape for high efficiency is so long anyways that you might aswell fit a bigger battery in there. Maybe it's great for low weight sports cars but they aren't long enough to be aerodynamic anyways. Battery packs are dropping so fast in price these days.
>>29093492Most customers want rear seats that are accessible and can be used by grown adults.
>>29093508They want it even though they probably don't need it. The same way they want a big raised SUV that kills children the moment there is an impact but do they really NEED it? I doubt it. People were getting by just fine back in the days in smaller cars.
idgaf that my EX30 is a brick with shit efficiency, I have solar panels, 20 kWh or 6 it doesn't matter it's free either way
>>29093501Electricity isn't free.
>>29093538It is ? See that big ball of plasma in the sky ? you can turn that into electricity
>>29093537Yeah efficiency is not really that important in real life since electricity is dirt cheap anyways and you can just PACK MORE BATTERY CELLS in the chassi. These experiments are fun but in real life sort of redundant. A standard sedan chassi gives you decent aerodynamics and space to store battery anyways.
>>29093542That doesn't work as well in winter. And if you want to take longer trips you'll have to use public chargers.
>>29093544>electricity is dirt cheap anywaysUnless you're British and pay one pound per kwh.
>>29093546It's true that it work less in winter, however for like ~6k€ you can buy 9kw of solar, which should net you enough to do ~90-100km per day even in the dead of winter (dec-january).
>>29093546Public chargers are still cheaper than public gas stations. >>29093547For real? Everything about the UK sucks.
>>29093036I don't know they look so fucking good as well.
>>29093487But that looks worse.
>>29093551>For real? Everything about the UK sucks.No, electricity is 36p/kwhr and we can legally carry guns without being shot by the feds, unlike in Minnesota.
>>29093492No, they are not. The battery pack rises the beltline and is a pain in the ass to work with as it requires a bulkier design. That why we get si many electric ShitUVs.
>>29093582>The battery pack rises the beltline and is a pain in the ass to work with as it requires a bulkier design.Porsche just solved this. You just store the battery where the backseats would be. It gives the car the same mid-engine weight distribution as the ICE version.
>>29093036Because EVs are not allowed to look cool or interesting in any way. They need to make them bland to keep the demoralization tactics going.
>>29093492Holy shit I see it every day, one of the ugliest cars ever put to production
>>29093021I prefer the harder lines of the XL-1, but the fact it's twice as efficient as the best Tesla can do is mighty impressive.
>>29093021>near production conceptThat just means they will never produce it.Almost no concepts make it into production in this sort of form.
>>29093582>Ioniq 6The battery pack in those is very thin, so it doesn't really raise the floor that much. There definitely are some compromises with cooling and protection, though.
>>29093601I don't think that is the answer. EVs are actually putting a lot of these well-known techniques into production because the constraints they have with batteries require them to embrace them.Whereas these techniques have been known for decades (if not a century) and have not been maximized by ICE cars even though they could have.
>>29093537Better efficiency means less time at the charger, means you can drive further and faster. Just in general less down time and hassle.
>>29093938Will solar panels on the top catch on? They said that it adds 30km to the range under optimal conditions so it probably won't amount much in reality but you can probably trick some gullible retards into expecting that it charges the HV battery when it only feeds into the 12V.
>>29094035Most modern mid-tier EVs go 400 real world kms now anyways. If you're spending 15 or 25 minutes at that one charging stop is hardly a big deal. It takes longer to take a piss and stretch your legs anyways. Sadly you can't really apply these efficient designs on small cars such as hatchbacks because they're too blocky and short.
>>29094035>Better efficiency means less time at the charger,That depends on your charging speeds. The ID.Polo only has 105kW while other cars can manage 200, 300 or even 400.>you can drive further and faster.You can get the same and better ranges with larger batteries. This one has 55kWh and there's cars with more than twice the amount. Maximum speed for the standard ID.Polo is 160km/h and 190 for the GTI. There's nothing street legal that's twice as fast but it's far from the top.
>>29093028It would mean the largest tesla battery of 100kwh lasting 600 miles
>>290940756.89 kWh/100 km with a 100 kwh battery would be 1450km or 900 miles.
>>29094058You won't always have access to fast chargers also charging very fast is not kind to the battery.Larger batteries is more expensive and heavier. Heavier cars need even more heavy structures which in turn means more cost. Heavier cars are also less fun to drive.
>>29093021If this was a design to be as aerodynamically efficient as possible, it reeks of designers that still have not gotten over how not to design a normal car first.its better than the absolute boxes, but still looks like it was designed with a engine in the front. I was hoping for something more zany with that consideration completely gone.
>>29094129it was designed to be road legal and is aerodynamically efficient as possible for a car that borrows everything underneith from another model and that also could be as close to a "normal" car as possible
>>29093021Like the Volkswagen XL1, it's one of those things that the larger goyim population simple cannot be allowed to have.
>>29093031Why do these gay cars all have square steering wheels? They are horrible to drive. Bump through your hands when cornering.
>>29094152i imagine most buyers aren't driving them hard enough for it to be an issue>>29094139I mean they sell the Prius. They sold the Insight. It's a step further in aerodynamics, yes.
>>29094152So they don't block the driver's display
>>29094127>also charging very fast is not kind to the battery.Only if you have no active battery cooling.
>>29094178this helps but all fast charging will no matter what degrade the battery faster, temperture is not the only factor.
>>29094139The XL1 was too expensive to justify its existence and had little practical use due to its small trunk.This car isn't that useful either since it's 4.8m long. Most people drive around cities more than they drive on highways and it offers nothing extra for that use case.
>>29094185wdym "not that useful"? its like a less spacious wagon but with extremely good consumption. great for people driving far distances and for general normal use. the trunk has about 480 liters of storage and a deep underfloor.
>>29094191For general use you want something with four doors as well as a size that makes it fit into parking spots. The regular ID. Polo has a range of 450km with the 55kWh battery and it will have the same consumption in town. If you have a commute longer than that you may consider taking the train.
>>29093114>>29093028Can someone who's GDP isn't a rounding error please tell me what the fuck this means?In miles.
>>29094152Shut the fuck up poor fag flat bottom wheels are amazing
>>2909306161mpg. Crazy how cars somehow are incapable of achieving this today. This VW concept car will get regulated to hell until it's a pigfat SUV too.
>>29094209Just multiple with 1.6. 11kwh/100 miles.
>>29094214It's because gay ass Reddit tier hr lady retards are in charge of emissions regulation.Port injection engines my beloved....
>>29094217>Do mathNah I just won't buy it. Thanks though
>>29094218A Ford Maverick hybrid can get ~40ish on the highway. If you take current hybrid power trains and you put them in more aerodynamic body work, you'll get high mpg numbers. I think the Prius gets like 54 or in that range.Cars are heavier these days.
>>29094221>the Prius gets like 54 or in that rangePathetic. My 1993 Civic gets over 60mpg without any hybrid nonsense. Cars have been regulated into inefficiency. They're only as heavy and big as they are because of "safety" which wouldn't even be necessary if they weren't contending with 5 ton SUVs and pickups on the road.
>>29094214Because everyone think their basic econobox commuter needs 200hp
>>29094259I'm not disagreeing with you. You make the point for me. If your 93 Civic had a hybrid power train and a low-drag body, it would do better than the number you're getting with it.
>>29094077huh okay
>>29093571I pay 10 cents a kilowatt in WA.56cents surge pricing sounds like a nightmare
>>29094139XL1 was 100% bespoke. This one though is basically just an aerodynamic Polo. Look it up. If they price it above 40k they're pants on head retarded.
>no one is complaining about the blatant rear window deleteit's so fucking over.the cattle is finally cooked.
>>29094182And having a larger battery helps mitigate the effect since the power is spread over more cells.
>>290930216.89 kWh/100 km is ~0.75L/100km. In a vibrator on wheels like that you could pull that off with a harbor freight predator engine. You could get the same range with a small jerry can of gas or diesel which would be several hundreds lbs lighter. I don't see how this thing is impressive. Make a real pickup truck that does that then come back.
>>29094657sure thing cleetusgo ahead and try it
>>29094664Robot Cantina
>>29094638Be glad it still has side mirrors.
>>29093046Aren't they just a latch or something? Modern cars could have an electronic lock on the dash/computer.
>>29094075Are you an American?
>>29093090Bait or retard?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumpler_Tropfenwagen
>>29093036imagine having to take off an entire body panel just to change a tire
>>29094214its because modern cars weigh as much as your mother
>>29094178Incorrect, higher amps is always harder on the battery at same temps. Also the temps won't be the same, the high amp charging will always be hotter. Fast charging is never the correct decision unless you're on a road trip.
>>29093605I think it looks great
>>29096440but i NEEED fast charging! I can't possibly just plug in my car overnight, it needs to have 2000km of range and recharge just as fast as I could have bought gas!!!
>>29096451Yeah. Not everyone is a city-bound apartment dweller who's office is 10 minutes down the road and never drives more than 100km round trip.
>>29096459Virtually nobody drives more than 100km per day. You are a tiny minority.The average person drive around half of that.
>>29096461You're literally like those Californians that just can't understand why the entire USA doesn't do everything the way it's done in California.Pray tell, what European megacity are you sheltered in?
>>29096459americans will seriously get a job across the country and complain that it's their car's fault they can't get there on time
>>29096472>You're literally like those Californians thatYou mean the majority of people, retard? Even people who live in suburbs far from work don't drive that much.Get over it, it's real. You are the outlier.
>>29096459This. I actually do need fast charging. Once I leave work, it's an 4 hour drive to get back home. I only have a few minutes to charge before I have to get back out for my Uber side hustle, and then I'm on the job site again in the morning.
>>29096461>>29096475Fuck off with your 15 Minute City goy control psyop. Some of us choose not to live in the niggerhive.
>>29096475>the majority of people>(in my European megacity)Yeah see, there's your problem right there. You never leave your little bubble.
I live in NJ and have to commute into NYC every day. EVs should be banned, they will never have enough range to get me there.
>>29096477>BAWWWWWWNO, retard, you are not representative of anything and nobody owes you anything. You DON'T get a say on what everyone does.The everyman DOES drive less than that. Deal with it.
>>29096479I don't live in Europe, you're just wrong and are flailing.
>>29096483The "everyman" is a treasonous anti-american goyslopped cuck then.
>>29096489>BAWWWWWWAnd you are STILL wrong about what people do and are trying to pretend we'll all stop noticing.
>>29096487Well you certainly don't live in the US.What am I wrong about exactly? You live in a city, in an apartment. Your job is very close to your work. You never travel any appreciable distance by car. You think what works in a city should work for everyone everywhere. Oh but you don't live in Europe? Yeah that totally blows my entire argument out of the water.
>>29096493>job is very close to your workresidence, rather
>>29096493>Well you certainly don't live in the US.Yes I do. The average American does not drive an hour to work. It is actually retarded that you think the people around you put up with that.You can just look at used cars and use some of that math you never learned. The mileage of those cars is rarely as high as it'd need to be for your story to make sense.
>>29096498I thought you were the metric fag, that's who I was responding to.My point still stands, just because YOU live in a city you think everybody can just charge overnight and never goes on a road trip anywhere so everybody needs an EV just like you.
>>29096498>The average American does not drive an hour to work.Yes they do. And I do, so EVs should be banned, since they will not even last one full hour and then take EIGHT more to charge.
>>29096506I am the person you're talking to. Me understanding that nobody drives that much in metric either is just common sense.>just because YOUNO, retard, YOU are the one talking about you. I am not talking about me at all. I'm talking about what the average person actually, in real life, does. YOU are the only one doing that.There is nothing about this car as far as range that would bother the average person. YOU are the outlier.
>>29096511No they don't, only you do.Again, you could just your brain and do some math. Every used car for sale would be about twice the mileage they actually are if your bullshit was correct.
>>29093021>VW dropped this near production concept recently and no one is talking about itBecause the GAME is Zero Sum.JEWS would merely cut oil production in order to offset any short-lived Savings enjoyed by the Consumer.The Oil Prices would resume the same pricing and Profit Margins.We cannot "win" within this Neoliberal market-based economy.
>>29093021You can do that yourself, there's a guy on tiktok claiming he got 90 mpghttps://vt.tiktok.com/ZSq3Sj8LF/
>>29096517Lol calm tf down>I'm not talking about me at allHorseshit. If I'm talking about me, then you are definitely talking about you. Hiding behind this "muh average person" bullshit is not fooling anyone. I literally said at the beginning of this >>29096459>Not everyone is a city-bound apartment dweller who's office is 10 minutes down the road and never drives more than 100km round tripDon't move the goalposts here pretending like we were talking about the average person. That was YOU that started that shit.
>>29096527Mods like this cause problems, though. The screw holes he added will promote rust. Not to mention his mod is literally held on by duct tape in places.
>>29096517Not gonna fall for your 15 minute city neolib niggerlicous nonsense. Some of us actually drive our cars and need more than 1000 miles of range and to be able to refill the tank in faster than 16 hours.
>>29096531>Horseshit. If I'm talking about me, then you are definitely talking about you. LOLYou are just talking about yourself and strawmanning.
>>29096534>AIEEE HE MIXED MATERIALS!!!!never thought i'd see a Protestant Crashout
>>29096537Do you enjoy being unable to drive in the rain
>>29096539This, you can't even use an EV when it's anything other than 60 degrees and sunny. Everything will just short out.
>>29096536>no uI said you were projecting first, are you claiming you are not part of the majority you're appealing to and therefore not talking about yourself?>strawmanningHow? Because I thought you were European because you used exclusively metric? Again what did I get wrong about you aside from that?
>>29096544>I said you were projecting firstSo you admit you're projecting, good.I have no projected one bit, nor changed my argument like you have. The average person drives as much as I pointed out they do.
>>29094272they do when the basic commuter "econobox" weighs 2500kg
>>29096547The average person drives more than an EV would ever allow.
>>29096547>you said I was doing it so you're admitting you're doing itWhat?I said not everyone is like you and you are projecting, like a Californian. Your counter to that is literally just "no u"
>>29096527Retard is gonna get beaten down on the highway.
>>29096554No they don't, again, you can just look at used car sales as a reference.50 miles * 2 way trip * 250 workdays a year = 25000 miles.Almost NOBODY drives that much. Your average used car at 5 years old only has around 60K-70K miles.
>>29096558Why didn't they just run her over with a truck? Are they stupid?
>>29096555You said you are projecting. Saying "You projected first" means you projected as well. That's what English means.Except I didn't.
>>29096559>metric againWhy are you gay and european?
>>29096563Yeah I never said that >>29096544"I said you were projecting first" as in I was the first one to lodge that accusation and you are just trying to turn it around on me, hence the "no u" part. Are you okay?
>>29093492I own this vehicle but in white
>>29096568Meanwhile, in reality>>29096544>I said you were projecting firstDon't worry, it doesn't actually matter that you got caught in your words, your words are still bullshit no matter what. You are projecting, lying, strawmanning, making shit up, and I am not.
>>29093492The EV has to be able to win every collision or else the chinese will explode us with batteries. That's why a lifted CUEV is the only way forward.
>>29096572Yeah that's the exact post I linked to in my previous reply?Are you sure you understand English? That sentence means I was the first one to make the accusation. How you think my accusation of you projecting is me admitting I'm projecting makes zero sense.What did I lie or strawman about? What did I make up? You're the projectionist here lmao
>>29096440That's why they increased the voltage instead.
>>29094209>hah, jews make more money off of ME than off of YOU!!!americans and their weird flexes...
>>29094209>admitting to being retardedThis isn't the gotcha you think it is.
>>29093021Call me when someone releases an EV retrofit kit with batteries the size and weight of a full 60 l tank for €7k with labor. Otherwise this gay shit can fuck off.
>>29093021>near production
>>29094214>>29094218>>29094272>>29096403it's because of safety regulations. you are literally not allowed to ship a car that fails crash tests, which is cool because you won't die if you get tboned by a dodge ram, but cringe because you now need 300hp to even get off the line
>>29096558>w*man getting put in her placeWhat am I supposed to be upset about here again?
>>29096482what?
>>29094259>create a tonnage tax>cars over 2600lb pay an increasingly higher tax>cars over 5000lb pay tax on a logarithmic scale>watch as car weight starts dropping yoyyou're welcome
>>29097041I've been saying this for some time now. Also a friend told me they did this in Paris I believe and the amount of Karen Panzers dropped dramatically. Guess looking prestigious in a cuckover isn't more important than paying extra taxes because of it.
>>29097036>you are literally not allowed to ship a car that fails crash tests,What exactly does failure mean? The Renault Zoe 2021 facelift got 0 stars in EURO NCAP and it was still sold.https://www.euroncap.com/assessments/renault/zoe/0903/
>>29097050>284,761 lifetime salesthat's why
>>29097057That's fairly decent for an EV of the time but it includes the original generation which was nowhere as unsafe.
>>29097036>Maxes out at Ultra high strength steel>No Kaioken times 4 level steel>No Super Saiyan level steel>No ultimate instinct level steelPleb
>>29097036revisiting plastic body panels like saturn used to use might be a low cost way to shed at least a little weight.
>>29097039imagine living in a place called fucking Yonkers oml
>>29097260yonkin' it hard to this post
>near production concept
>>29097336it will never see the light of day. To cut costs they are planning ti consolidate their offerings, launching annudah niche faggot car will be a repeat of the troc convertible disaster
>>29097050>A pillar didn't even budgeThat's about 20 stars in the year 1995
>>29093031This numale WEF soibug aesthetic needs to die
>>29097041It's also very reasonable since heavier cars damage roads more.
>>29096564The whole world except America uses metric, so you are the minority here, and homosexuals are known to be the minority
>>29097057that's alot for a niche car, dumbass
>>29097050It got zero stars because it doesn't have all the automated driver assist bullshit, which in a sensible world would score it higher.
