Early 2000s Thunderbirds are cool
>>29103716I driven one and was utterly shocked that it has the same exact interior as my Lincoln LS
>>29103716I like them too. Remember an Anon had a black one on here a few years ago. He also liked it. What's not to like? Is it FWD?
>>29103730I think they were RWD
>>29103716The PT Cruiser was the auto industry's biggest mistake.
>>29103716the opera window really bothers me
>>29103730>>29103736I looked it up for you using something called a "search engine" and have found that they are yes indeed rwd you're very welcome yesYour fortune: you will meet a dark handsome man
>
>>29103853he may be retarded, but he's hard working!
shoulda cummed with vinyl fake leather tops, in tiger or zebra stripes or leopard spots.
>>29103716Yeah it's not as good as the original, but it's still cool in it's own right
>>29103716>take body-style built for fins and lop off the fins>take world-class 4.6 DOHC Intec motor - and don't bother using ityeah, it's spectacular.
There is an old man in the neighborhood owns one, I go take a look at it whenever it is parked outside. It looks very nice in person. A lot of fine details that you need to see in person to appreciate.
>>29104948I know some people who worked at Ford when they did the tooling for it. They had the most experienced guys given time to do their best work on stuff like the the moulds for the taillights, the dies for the body panels, etc. They gave them the time and resources to get the fit and finish and the overall quality of the parts like that as good as Ford was able to do at the time. They never put that much into the rest of their cars.
>>29103859That's what my CV says.
