It looks good
>>29113231The asphalt? Yeah, looks like a very nice road.
faguar lol
>>29113231Nope. The silhouette is interesting, but the front and back have absolutely no character, and the design isn't consistent through the whole car.
>>29113231Oh boy plastic!
Reminds me of the 2000s nissan gt-r concept, but stretched to 4 doors. I don't hate it.I don't know why they keep making windows so mall and doors so tall though but I guess they must have good reasons
>>29113231Those wheels are 23 fucking inches in diameter.
>>29113231i hate the front end and i wish the trunk was more pronounced rather than doing the modern car thing, but i think they pulled off the ridiculous door to window ratio. it looks like the windows are being distorted due to the speed of the car which is cool. also still looks like a villain car except maybe a comic book villain not a bond villain
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6gGCPd_1ic
>>29113269crash safety, at least they look liked chopped hot rods if you squint hard enough
Is this space literally just empty, its behind the axle/motor but too far back to be a frunk. So wtf is there.
>>29113231>It looks good
>>29113231Doesn't this car feel claustrophobic? The confined space feels suffocating to me.
>>29113269the battery took a lot of space underneath, also crash safety, so you end up with not much space left for the windows
>>29113231Imagine how much better it would look if it wasn't a crossover
>>29113329that's the Luxury Gap™see 5:50 in the the top gear video >>29113309
>>29113231I really like it. It's a genuine old school jag for the 21st century. Supervillain looks, long bonnet with a low profile and stupid amounts of power.
>>29113334I know they want big dash/axle ratio, but thought they'd use that space for battery and put less in the floor. That way you can have a lower roofline than most EVs while still having cabin space.
>>29113329>Double wishbones Based
>>29113231The front is hideous and would have looked better if the followed the design queues of the back rather than going for that weird faux-grille thing. It's an EV, it doesn't need a grille, and it certainly doesn't need the appearance of a grille.The back I quite like though, and the overall shape and silhouette is quite cool. They probably need to stop showing it in all these dumb ass colors though, people are just going to get it in black.
Wot if ur car wuz Roblox
>>29113231it's very close to looking good, it's just some details that need work like the angles on the sides of the headlights are ugly(and so are the big empty slabs underneath them)or the way the side window line doesn't quite catch the roof line and the way the bottom of it comes up just a little in the rear for no reason in such an impotent undecided way or the front badge that looks as if a badge was there but it fell off so someone wrote in the logo with a sharpie if Jag survives until this gets a facelifted or a two door model I'm interested in what it will look like
>>29113231I think it looks fine, better than the concept for sure. Maybe they had no choice due to the batteries in the floor, but I wish it was just a tad less monolithic. Looks sleek as fuck with a couple inches lopped of the body
>>29113231The absolute inundation of random off-brand chinese temu EVs hitting Australian shores that have aped this design language have really taken the wind out of this things' sails for me. They fucked around too long getting it to market. We already have cars that look kind of like this being used as family haulers by the masses and you can get them for like 400 a week on a novated lease. Hard to get hyped at all for the jag in light of that. Ofc I'm driving around in a 30 year old shitbox with actual decent visibility and pre-nanny state proportions so I'm not the target market anyways.
>>29113380name three examples of chink EVs with actually this design language(and not some part of it like squinty headlights)
>>29113244I like the trees in the background
>>29113386Maybe 'design language' was the wrong way of putting it. I mean visually striking, but not necessarily attractive, monolithic, fuckhuge bloated rolling tech software demos designed to wow normies based on how many LED light bars and screens they can incorporate. A few of them produce a visceral wow factor when you pull up next to them in an MX5 and see the size of the brake calipers and the sheer size of them. I think that takes some of the sheen off this thing, especially considering how expensive it will be. I've seen a few with the same weird matte paint too.
>>29113391>not necessarily attractive, monolithic, fuckhuge bloated rolling tech software demos designed to wow normies based on how many LED light bars and screens they can incorporate.This isn't really what the Type 1 is thoughbeit. It's only a bit longer than a 5 Series for example, but it's low and wide. Concept-wise it's more like the old personal luxury coupes of the 1950s
>>29113309The ass really is the worst part about it. Fucking hell that's ugly.
>>29113395It loos like a fat piece of shit.
It would look better if they made the front like the rear as if the whole car was an giant heatsink or something
>>29113407Ew that looks even worse. Why not just turn it into a normal car instead? This current flavor of futurism needs to fuck off already.
>>29113398In a photo on its own, maybe. In reality it's only 1.4m tall, so it won't look faat at all
>>29113379>same black wheels with shitty diamond cut design as a fucking kia
>>29113379idk, i like low hoods on sports cars but this thing mogs harder when its tall as fuck.
>>29113407
>>29113231it doesn't look any worse than anything else coming out these days
>>29113231Kwabguar looks like shit as expectedKek What a raped company owned by indians
>>29113407Looks like a gay ass Charger.
Lazy ass designCyber truck sedan headass lookin motherfucker.If you think this is nice, you're apart of the problem of everything wrong with the current auto industry. Kick it out from under you when you StoolMaxx
>>29113231this is almost acceptable>>29113379this is not a good angle
Jaguars should have shrink wrapped, curvy body.Pic rel is from 2022 while the Type 01 supposedly was finished pre covid in 2019 so wtf happened there.Overall proportions aren't bad aside from too long rear overhang but it's missing details everywhere, like a block of clay before they start styling it.
It looks like an extremely boring interpretation of what "cyber" asthetic looks like. The Audi made by the exact same designer is better looking in all ways compared to this. Anyway this will be sold to pre-vetted Chinese buyers like the Ferrari luce, declared a "success", and then never talked about ever again
lod3 500 polygon ps1 model havin' ass
>chart port bigger than the windowsLOL
>>29113863The rightmost car there is absolutely gorgeous, shame they went with slop instead
>>29113231Who is the target audience for this? 60 year old homosexual millionaires?
>>29114008it's not even that expensive, actually
>>29113876It has over 1000 hp, double wishies and great weight distribution due to cramming a bunch of cells up front to balance it. Even the ugly flat rear end is for aero reasons to get a bit of extra range. They've made it as a driver's electric GT, as far as that can be a thing. The interior looks cramped and corporate ugly, but so does everything nowadays.My guess is thisll be the statement piece they'll get people talking about, then they'll follow it up with an SUV on the same platform that will be what they actually try to make money on.
>>29113407I agree, that looks much better and is more cohesive.
>>29113231What is that a Nissan Altima? Looks like garbage and is probably for rainbow hairs only.
>>29113231This thing mogs
>>29113231
>>29113231Those windows are way too big, you can still barely see out of them.
>>29113231It's woke.
>>29113439>This current flavor of futurism needs to fuck off already.Only very few cars are doing this, do you really want the 2010s trend of sharp curves and angry headlights to last another 10 to 15 years you stupid mouthbreather?
>>29114432I'd rather just have normal looking cars again. Like anything before the 2010s.
>>29114446>I'd rather just have normal looking cars again.Then buy a used one. You're never getting blob shaped ones again, let alone normal sized ones.
>>29114451I already have one from the 80s. I'm still going to complain about current cars every chance I get since they shouldn't even be this bad to begin with.
>>29113626It's an improvement, but now it just looks like when rappers were making terrible restomods of old cars
>>29114452have fun shouting at the clouds i guess. I also own an 80s Toyota and i hate modern cars in general but i really the cyberpunk 2077 inspired boxy futurist design of the new concepts.
>>29114463Yes, let's just continue to let the world around us sink further and further into a vat of shit without at least speaking out against it. Great idea.
>>29114476I'm not the one spending 40k+ on a shitmobile with heating seat subscriptions that's built to shit itself and breakdown in 5 years time. What's wrong with letting normalfaggots waste their money and time on inferior products? Car companies are not going to make good cars ever again and you can't influence them to
>>29114482>What's wrong with letting normalfaggots waste their money and time on inferior products?This is the exact kind of mindset that made everything so shit to begin with. Instead of cutting off the rot, we let it take hold.>Car companies are not going to make good cars ever again and you can't influence them toI'm still going to speak my mind about it. It may go in one ear and come out the other, but it still went in and their ugly malformed brains still cataloged it.
>>29114488>Instead of cutting off the rot, we let it take holdYou're not going to influence the buying decisions of millions of people. Hundreds of other products in other categories have gone to shit in the past decade and there's nothing you can do about it. This is how neoliberal capitalism works, either adapt and buy the good old stuff or whine eternally while eating shit from modernity
>>29114495As I said, I am buying the good old stuff. But I'm also not going out quietly. This shit sucks, and I'm going to say it sucks.
>>29114498>But I'm also not going out quietly.there's no reason to spike your cortisol and pop blood vessels>This shit sucks, and I'm going to say it sucks.Water is wet
>>29114507>there's no reason to spike your cortisol and pop blood vesselsI don't mind it.
>no sun roof>no rear windowits shita
Why do all these companies going full EV go for a full retard halo priced sedan/coupe instead of an SUV that would actually sell.
>>29113990ROFL.What a clown car.
>>29114715cuz SUVs are boring
>>29114715It goes something like this>2 door coupe concept only>4 door sedan "prestige" halo>4 door cuckover mass market
>>29114649Faggot
>>29113231Wow those side skirts/front spoiler are awful, and the hood is way too tall in the front. Good overall silhouette but the details just ruin it. Looks like it was designed on a Friday lunch break
>>29113231It's kinda blurry, it would be a better picture without that faguar in the way.
>rajeshs cyberpunk grok prompt made it to productionjfc
>>29113231>PooManCUKPoor Mans Cadillac, UK
>>29115548this but unironically
>>29115548This just looks like they brought back the 6000 SUX
>>29113231It's not bad, but it's not a Jaguar. If they'd called it a Cadillac or Chrysler. Would probably make more sense.
>>29113379>less monolithicfag
>>29113990this thing mogs i swear to god
>>29115548ugly in a cool way>>29113231ugly in a lame way
>>29115688>it has to look like a eggkys
>>29115694lines and corners are greattiny/no windows a shitahonestly raising the roofline and reinstalling windows a sunroof and a v12 would make it 20 times better
>>29115581We're basically in a Verhoeven timeline so it works out.
I like the way it looks. I'm a poor and would never buy it, but I think it looks like a parody of some crazy sedan. It needs to be bullet resistant and have a massive V10 or V12.
Doesn't look wide enough
I refuse to believe anyone actually find this thing looking good. Has to be paid shills. If I have to choose between this or the cybertruck I would rather walk.
>>29116679Keep in mind that moderniggers have no taste
>>29113231Honestly who the fuck is this for?>400mi range>4 sec 0-60>4 doorsSo they made a fucking Model S but 10 years too late and with all the practicality thrown out for aesthetics? I don't get it at all. Who is gonna buy this?It is an unexceptional vehicle offering pisspoor value for money and launching in a fucking dead market segment. Literally that design is the only thing it has going for it and to me that only looks good in some specific angles.
>>29116714Can you show me on the doll where it looks good?
>>29116716I haven't even stared at it enough to tell you exactly. Actually it's so tall and fat it's fugly just because of that.
>>29113231you could never be her
>>29116716If you ignore the styling choices in the front and back of the car, it's not that bad. Not great but not bad. The nose is still far too long though.
>>29116731>The nose is still far too long though.Fag. A luxury car's gotta have the money gap.
>>29113990
>>29117000Notice how the front wheel is at the front of the car and not right by your feet with an unnecessarily long front overhang?And come on it's not like there needs to be space for a long i6 engine or anything it's just a pretentious design choice.
coupe?
Ignore the mistakes, it's a quick put together shoop. Borzoi version
>>29117221Nice, you removed the charge port in that one
>>29117221Yes
>>29117223Don't need a charging port when you a 16 liter V24 engine
>>29116731>>29113231>>29113379>>29113368>it's very close to looking good, it's just some details that need workIt doesn't look bad, but it also doesn't look like a Jaguar. That's what is sad about this vehicle. Since inception, Jaguar always produced beautiful vehicles. They've had some stinkers in the 2000s, but in general, almost all of their cars were genuinely beautiful and conveyed a sense of motion even when they were standing still. They also always had a feminine, feline quality to them. If a Rolls-Royce is a Lion, then a Jaguar is well, a Jaguar, the big cat from South America. It's sleek and aesthetically pleasing. I don't hate how this new one looks, but it just doesn't pay any homage to the incredible legacy of Jaguar design. Even a Tesla Model 3 is more beautiful than this new Jag, and that's sad
>>29113863Those look sick
>>29113231https://youtu.be/LnyQSDILNrM?si=A59sXtufgP9sPPYp
>>29117140>yo GPT, make this look like a Jaguar
>>29117778>low profile wheelsgarbage
>>29113231Its awesome. Death to EGG Crossovers!
>>29116725Good. That Chrysler is ugly AF.
>>29117843No it's not
I think overall the concept and direction is kino as fuck, my problems are however these: >the new logo SUCKS and it being tacked on the grill in a rectangle is incredibly retarded, could be fixed by a brutalist/minimalist jaguar icon>no rear window (literally why?)>abysmal storage space despite being a gigantic car >touch screen galore interior for a premium car If they fixed these issues it would be an incredible vehicle.
>>29117778Ouch.Maybe I'm just old but man I see something like that and I much prefer it. The smooth curves, the organic shape, the shine.Of course it's a coupe but even as a 4 door it would rule.
I agree and I even believe it's the best looking car to come out in the past 10 years or at least in the top 3. Presentation wasn't great but it looks kino in all black. I'll consider picking one up in ten years when depreciation has done what it does to all jaguars.
>>29117577Idk man, Jaguars have been lacking for a while now. I mean look at this thing - slap a kidney grille on and it's basically a BMW. It's bland and uninspired. Current Volvos are more interesting. The Type 01 feels like a Hail Mary from a dying car company, and while it may not carry any of the classic Jaguar DNA, you can't say it doesn't make a statement. They'll definitely stand out rolling down the street.
DESU jaguars have been changing their brand image since the start, the Type 01 seems like a new change of pace as per usual, stagnation is death, they say
now I'm just waiting for jaguar to make a hot hatch lol
>>29113231Looks like they tried to build the new NASCAR standard in fever dreams.Nope. Modern-ugly.
>>29117778So occasionally Chat does get one right. Huh. And the bumper too, chef's kiss.
>>29117778My version of chat prefers the kinda blah 2010-2020 style, I like your slop more.
>>29118243>>29118240>unironically saying chat instead of ChatGPT The absolute state of brainfried retards
ayo wtf
>>29118282WTF ???
>>29118282>>29118284I really can't comprehend how that car can look so massive on the outside but so tiny on the inside AND also have near zero trunk space
>>29118286Not even a divider or firewall between the cargo area and the passenger compartment. It's genuinely impressive how badly the packaging was done. All style, zero substance.
Interior reminds me of something.
>>29118267"Colloquial? What does that mean?"
>>29118322HON HON HON
>>29118322>>29118282wow i thought it was just the outside but the interior is jeet generated slop toohow did they fuck it up so badly
>>29118286The concept itself doesn't make sense. A big four door GT car that isn't big enough for four people or their luggage. Should have been a 2-door coupe. Keep the size same and actually make it a statement, giant long hood and a short rear deck, classic proportions.
>>29118894You can fit in 4 people and enough luggage perfectly fine into a car of these dimensions, it's just retarded engineering. All the decisions I've heard sound like massive cope. >oh we've put a lot of the battery at the front plus there's motorsFair enough, but then why is there zero trunk space and the cabin is still tiny as fuck?
>do the same thing over and over and over again No.
>>29113231the spine in the interior that does fuckall besides hold trash and drive-through beverages is like a really annoyingly asexual thing from the rebrand. unlike normal cars like my boyfriend's '08 civic hybrid, this thing gets in the way of crawling across the center console and brutally make out and fuck. they have made a separator like in business class flights which is uppity public transport, but here it's in a personal automobile where you still get to choose the people that occupy its passenger seats.
>>29118282>>29118284Jesus that looks so fucking cramped
>>29117221finally, a v16 jag
>>29117577>but it also doesn't look like a Jaguargood, no one was buying jags
>>29118948>824 LBSweight of the driver?
>>29113269>I don't know why they keep making windows so mall and doors so tall though but I guess they must have good reasonsslow transition to a fully enclosed self driving pod vehicle
>>29113329Really. What the fuck is there? Just empty space? Surely they should've at least put some of the batteries in there to lower the floor and make the car less cramped.
>>29116725I had the revelation recently that the Durango is just a tall Magnum
>>29117221who wins
>>29118215every single sedan is just an carall of themlike if you asked a toddler to draw a car
>>29119668i didnt know your mother could drive
>>29113626Looks like something I would draw in 5th grade when I was figuring out perspective n shit and had to use straight lines
>>29118284in awe at the thicccness of this door, absolute unit
