How do you cope with not having the top engine option of your car?
the worst engine option of the camaro with the worst tires with no LSD still handles better than the best Miata/GR86/Yaris GR.
>>29117889Are Miata, GR86 and Yaris GR in the room with us right now?
all my vehicles either have the top engine option or better except for one and for that one i coped by putting a big turbo on it.
>>29117894How can it have a better engine option than the top one?
>>29117886Because the ZR1X costs like $300,000 with dealer markups and the Grand Sport X is still really fast. I guess I'm broke.
>>29117886In case of pic related, you can cope by saying that you can't get a Shaker on a Hellcat
But I do?The badic bitch model had 54hp, the top dog model of my car had 58hp.It now has a 68hp big block swap.
>>29117899The Shaker on nu-Chally is kind of a joke anyway
>>29117895Build the engine
>>29117886i call it "being poor"
>>29117886By being a functional adult
By not having low IQ and being secure in my masculinity
>>29117895you known it's possible to put engines in a car that the car never came with from the factory, right?
>>29117935Then it can't really be called an option, can it?
>>29117886removed the cat so at least it sounds nice
It's like people who miss out on all the interior options and accessories.
>>29117942engine swaps may not be an option for you but they are for others.
>>29117886My car has the top engine option. My SUV doesn't have the big boi engine option (8.1 liter) but the smaller engine is technically the better engine.
>>29117907Um....
>>29117889Can you bread your LNF or shut the fuck up about the 4cyl Camaro?
>>29118034this is my first time talking about it.
>>29117886But I do, anon. I have the top engine option of my car, in all its 75hp glory.
>>29117886since I drive an E60, I quite enjoy not having an M5, I don't have the money to maintain that. Even though I work at a car parts store and work on my own car. I'm quite happy with the 535d.
>>29118044my nissan z rapes your camero
i ride a moped and when it works at all it's a fucking miracle
>>29118259Haha, and I rapes you. Literally. I am gonna rape you. Sleep with one eye open tonight
>>29118279jokes on you im into being fucked while asleep/delirious/otherwise incapacitated
By having the top engine available.
>>29117886>But I do.
>>29117886I'd rather have the scatpack. I like na vehicles
The 5.7L gets much better mileage than the 7.4L so I am fine with this.
the 3.6 makes 80% of the 5.7's power, has no cylinder deactivation, eco mode or emissions bullshit, and makes my car handle better because its 200 lbs lighter over the front wheels, making it more fun to drive. from personal experience the bigger heavier motors are armchair drag racer larp that nobody really uses for their intended purpose and so are a waste of money.
>>291186801st Gen Vortec chads rise up!
>>29118716>the 3.6 makes 80% of the 5.7's powerAnd only 65% of the torque, which is needed in such a pigfat car.
>>29117886>How do you cope with not having a Stellantis heap
>>29118736>And only 65% of the torque, which is needed in such a pigfat car.i'm not towing and the car weighs a whole your mom less so it's irrelevant
>>29118736>>29118751>having a "muscle car" that's lower than a Ram 1500That's like having your grandpa steal your GF
>>29117905I'm so mad I didn't pick this thing up from the auction.Only one I've ever seen in Canada.Do those use standard hubs or something? What wheels are those?
>>29118753ram also has the 3.6 dumbfuck
>>29118757Yeah and nobody in their right fucking mind ever specs one with that engine because it's pointless to use a gutless piece of shit to move a heavy vehicle.
>>29118758oh yeah that's why they're the standard engine in promaster vans and jeep wranglers and gladiators (all rated to tow over 7,000 lbs) right?
>gutless>entirely flat 270 lb-ft torque curve from rolling idle-6700 rpm
>>29118763I have never seen a Promaster towing anything. Wranglers and Gladiators struggle to move themselves down the highway at the speed limit unladen let alone towing anything. >>29118764What makes you think 270 lb-ft would be enough to move a 5000lb vehicle? How is that severe lack of torque going to help you move down the highway?
>>29118765>What makes you think 270 lb-ft would be enough to move a 5000lb vehicle?because it is?
>>29118767It clearly isn't when Ram 1500's are pushing your shit in.
>wrangler: 4700 lbs>gladiator: 5000 lbs>ram 3.6: 5400 lbs>grand cherokee/durango: 4875 lbs>promaster: 5260 lbs>pacifica: 4521 lbs >charger: 3957 lbs>challenger: 3850 lbs so much for gutlesschally gets the ram spec full-fat 305/270 motor too, pac,rango, and charger get a detuned variant
>>29118768Ram 1500 5.7: 6.5 sec 0-60Challenger 3.6: 5.8 sec 0-60
>>29118772lol 0-60 times. Compare 1/4 mile times. A V6 Chally is a 14 second car which is slow as fuck. Ram 1500's are running the same time and they're one of the more gutless half tons. That's right. A bigger, heavier and much less aerodynamic truck is pulling on you after 60mph which means you have a very gutless engine.
>>29118772>Ram: 5.4s 0-60mph 14.1s 1/4 mile @ 99mph>Challenger: 6.2s 0-60mph 14.7s 1/4 @ 97mphhttps://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15110544/2015-ram-1500-r-t-hemi-test-review/https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15109479/2015-dodge-challenger-v-6-8-speed-test-review/
>>29118754They have 4x130 bolt pattern, so vw bug wheels fit straight in.Those are genuine 60s 14" chrome mangels wheels from a Volkswagen.
>>29118293Not the way I do it.
>>29118782>trusting cuck and bull driver jewrnalists with hateboners>Ram: 5.4s 0-60mphLOL no>Alas, the R/T is no top-speed champ, with its governor dropping anchor at 106 mph. top kekeven a stock v6 chally makes it to 120 before the limiter hits what a pathetic piece of shit>>29118779copethe automotive press is yellow and lies all the time like the post below you citing an impossible 0-60 from a rare scsb 2wd sports truck variant nobody actually owns, car and driver is well known in enthusiast circles for fudging numbers and lying in order to curry favor with manufacturers. you might as well cite an ign review of a AAA video game.picrel from an actual owner of a real car in real conditions, not a paid off journalist
>>29118782>2015 Ram 1500 Regular Cab R/T (RWD, 5.7L Hemi): 4,816 lbs>2015 Ram 1500 Crew Cab (5.7L Hemi): 5,467 lbsyeah if you took another 600 lbs off a v6 challenger (easy just don't pick up your mom) it'd be pretty fuckin quick too
>>29118807Those times are never accurate lmao. Post your dragy results or a time slip from a track. All of the half tons on the market do 0-60 in the 5.5-5.8s range and they'll do that over and over every time because they have 4x4. There are a million dragy videos proving it.
>>29118796That's awesome.I love they way they look on the car.I've always been a fan of steelies, or steelies-looking wheels on cars.What cunt/area are you in? Are you Ural anon?
>>29118820>uhm sweaty your car's internal electronics connected directly to the triple core Raytheon cpu inside the sealed Continental GPEC2A that can literally see if you so much as breathe on the gas pedal are just *lip smack* not accurate>you should buy an obd gps tracker from and use a cell phone to send data into space and back again >Dragy is a high-tech company originally founded in Chinalmao fuck off chink i'm not buying your fuckass cop magnet
>Dragy is a high-tech company originally founded in China
>Standard OBD-II polling usually yields about 2 to 10 Hz (roughly 5 to 50 values per second)>The raw time needed to place a standard 8-byte frame onto CAN-C is roughly 110 µs at 1 Mbps, or around 0.2 ms at 500 kbps.yeah i think i trust my dashboard but thanks anyway Zhang>1 rmb has been deposited into your HSBC accountdon't @ me
>>29118826>Are you Ural anon?Yes. Love me soviet shitboxes
>>29117886I was rejected by 2 women for having the 3.5 v6 (not the pentastar) instead of the v8 hemi in my Chrysler 300. 2 women mind you. Usually I don't let that bother me but it bothering me.
