[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/o/ - Auto

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


vgh the good old days
>>
>>29143583
British cars were really kind of sad and meme-tier.
>>
File: 1785800160945097.jpg (172 KB, 1024x766)
172 KB JPG
>>29143587
Some of them were, but you're over-generalizing.
>>
File: rs2000.jpg (270 KB, 1920x1080)
270 KB JPG
>>29143598
Absolute RIG
But the japs copied this concept and mass produced them for cheaper with modern 80s technology and they were better in every way
>>
>>29143583
it's a bunch of miserable British Leyland scrap that spent more time in the shop than on the road
>>
>modern highways and roads
>Bri'ish cars were still small and underpowered
Why?
>>
File: 1774583615471577.jpg (256 KB, 2560x1707)
256 KB JPG
>>29143626
Wealthy people could buy big, powerful cars.
>>
>>29143626
same as now. if you had the money you could buy something quicker but most people prioritised economy.

the rover p6 was made for modern motorways and would handle them fine even now.
>>
>>29143626
>British gas prices
>>
>>29143676
the P6 was also a 60s design, that was the first decade of cars that could handle modern highway speeds
>>
>>29143676
so is no different from USA where most people in 60s had an I6 or small block V8 but richfags could buy a big V8 cruiser
>>
>>29143598
>>29143604
My Indian uncle MOT tester had his cherished Ford Mexico in white/blue stripes. Raced it, then restored it worth £100k+ given the crazy prices of fast Fords here

>>29143672
Dad's mate had an Interceptor but had to sell it to pay for a divorce and had to go live in a caravan on his mate's farm. He was working-class because back then they were dirt cheap to buy and petrol was cheap
>>
>>29143587
lol
>>
>>29143587
Ford opened a Model T plant in the UK in 1912 and within a decade claimed half the entire car market there. The 1930s was when Ford USA and UK products started diverging as the Ford flathead V8 was too thirsty so it became necessary to develop cars more suited for local conditions.
>>
>>29143698
still, England developed a middle class car culture early on while continental Europe didn't get one until the post-World War II years; prior to that there were only sports and luxury cars for the rich.
>>
>>29143705
>still, England developed a middle class car culture early on while continental Europe didn't get one until the post-World War II years; prior to that there were only sports and luxury cars for the rich.

Even then they heavily depended on US exports as they couldn't survive on just the European market. Italian manufacturers were exporting as much as 70% of their output to the US in the 1920s-30s.
>>
>>29143705
as proof, in WW2 when a tank broke down, GIs would attempt to fix it while Germans would usually just abandon them. The average German didn't own a car back then and few knew how to service motor vehicles.
>>
>>29143473
that was also a premium OHC I6 not the typical American one which was an economy pushrod engine with a 1 barrel carb
>>
>>29143725
those things got absolutely slapped by a basic bitch chevy impala.
>>
>>29143672
that thing just used a Chrysler engine anyway
>>
>>29143725
Jaguar actually made several sizes of the XK, the smallest was only 2.4L which is basically I4 size. And also, it's DOHC not single cam.
>>
>>29143730
using a big block V8 would be cheating. it would school an American I6 as those were just grocery getter engines and not designed for performance.
>>
>>29143730
dw they also made a 2 door sports version if racing is what interests you
>>
>>29143735
that was a stock impala that still had the radio and working interior trim. they didn't come with big blocks.
>>
>>29143739
>that was a stock impala that still had the radio and working interior trim. they didn't come with big blocks.

that's a 61 Impala. in fact the 409 was available although it wasn't a very good engine and soon got replaced by the Block II Chevy big blocks in 65.
>>
>>29143735
American I6s were always low end economy engines that manufacturers invested only the minimum amount of money into.
>>
>>29143746
V8s made more sense because turbo power wasn't wide spread, yet. so there were few ways to even get power out of a straight six. where as V8s could scale up indefinitely without making a long engine.
>>
>>29143749
>so there were few ways to even get power out of a straight six.
no? European and Japanese manufacturers did it usually with OHC and whatnot. there was just no motivation for Americans to do so since gas was cheap there.
>>
>>29143739
>>29143742
racing cars would typically be a bottom end Biscayne with a 409 to be as lightweight as possible. no radio or sound insulation.
>>
>>29143752
probably bigger intakes as well. American ones usually had pinhole intakes so they couldn't make power if you wanted to.
>>
>>29143757
the Slant Six for example, it had tiny intakes and it was an old-fashioned long stroke design. no way to get power out of it.
>>
>>29143752
OHC isn't netting you competitive power out of a straight six. that's exactly why the jaguars got shit on and why anything competitive in group 7 needed 8 or more cylinders.
>>
File: 1766502411377240.jpg (826 KB, 2048x1365)
826 KB JPG
>>29143692
Ones I see racing have a boot, but I heard that these were the first hatchback. Is that true?
>>
File: 1790594215667606.jpg (486 KB, 2200x1553)
486 KB JPG
>>29143731
Correct, Mostly 383's and some 440 big blocks, 3x2bbl in 1971 only.
>>
>>29143767
>jaguars got shit on
source?
>>
>>29143583
look at all of these rattle cans, goddamn the past is so SHIT
>>
File: 1774183462116882.jpg (196 KB, 1024x768)
196 KB JPG
>>29143858
The A40 Farina Countryman had a split lifting and lowering tailgate. The new feature it an early example of what later became known as a hatchback.
>>
>>29143866
a family member of mine works in the automobile industry. manufacturing has improved by leaps and bounds over the last 50 years. precision and tolerances are much tighter now than back then.
>>
I'd take any one of these shitboxes over a new bybrid or EV.
>>
>>29143864
did you not see the post here>>29143730 ? the impalas and ford galaxies basically killed everything.
>>
ENTER
>>
>>29143866
enjoy your rust spots, dents, missing and incorrect trim pieces, maybe even the wrong engine from what you ordered
>>
>>29143939
Me too, one of those cool Harry Potter cars would be perfect.
>>
File: file.png (1.35 MB, 1018x705)
1.35 MB PNG
>>29143687
basically. a p6 v8 was £1700 at launch when the average salary was £1200, so it basically cost as much as an MX5 does now.
>>
>>29143946
Damn was that really Jaguar's fastest car?
Everything I've been told about that company was a lie!
>>
>>29144814
>Jaguar's fastest car?
Fastest sedan car.
>>
>>29145393
Oh so OHC IS netting you competitive power out of a straight six just not when it's in a 4 door luxury sedan that was never built for competition?
>>
>>29145406
competitive power while not having to race against any V8s anyway or it would've gotten shit on just like the others.
>>
>>29145454
Thanks for showing us all you have zero knowledge of jaguar racing history
>>
>>29145482
you just claimed the stripped out """luxurious""" jaguar sedans were never built for competition, while the fully loaded impala somehow was. seems like it's you who doesn't know anything about jaguar history.
>>
>>29145486
Was that 4 door luxury saloon really jaguars best race car though?
Are you sure they didn't make some sports cars or something?
>>
File: Sunbeam Tiger Ad.jpg (62 KB, 480x346)
62 KB JPG
>>29145406
I was claiming that sedans aren't as fast as sports cars. IDK anything much about the British Touring cars except that it's not open to sports cars. So, no Corvettes either.
>>
>>29145495
Did any of those sports cars beat the corvette?
>>
>>29145498
>OHC isn't netting you competitive power out of a straight six

Dont shift the goalpost now little buddy
>>
>>29145500
>Sedan vs Sedan
>sports car vs Sports car
>moving the goalpost after the first goal was already won by V8s
sounds like it isn't competitive given that you didn't answer the question.
>>
>>29145501
>sounds like it isn't competitive
Source?
>>
>>29145502
source: couldn't compete with the V8 corvette, a rival sports car. also, make sure you reply to>>29145503
>>
>>29145506
But was it competitive?
>>
>>29145509
against other equally cucked euro sports cars I guess.
>>
>>29145513
Source?
>>
>>29145515
see>>29145506
>>
>>29145516
>against other equally cucked euro sports cars
Source?
>>
>>29145517
see>>29145506
>can't compete against the non european corvette
>>
make sure you respond to >>29145503 or you are admitting the 911 handles like shit and is better off with an LS swap.
>>
>>29145519
Source?
>>
>>29145523
see>>29145506
>>
>>29145524
Source?
>>
>>29145529
see>>29145506
>>
>>29145530
source?
>>
>>29145531
see>>29145506
>>
>>
>>29145533
source?
>>
>>29145535
see>>29145506
>>
>>
>>29145538
source?
>>
>>29145541
see>>29145506
>>
>>
>>29145542
source?
>>
>>29145546
see>>29145506
>>
>>
>>29145552
Source?
>>
>>29145557
see>>29145506
>>
>>29145558
Source?
>>
>>
>>29145559
see>>29145506
>>
>>29145562
Source?
>>
>>29145563
see>>29145506
>>
>>29145564
Source?
>>
>>29145565
see>>29145506
>>
>>
>>29145566
Source?
>>
>>29145571
see>>29145506
>>
>>
>>29145572
source?
>>
>>29145577
see>>29145506
>>
>>
>>29145579
source?
>>
>>29145585
see>>29145506
>>
>>
>>29145587
source?
>>
>>29145591
see>>29145506
>>
>>
>>29145592
Source?
>>
File: 1788451488948.png (290 KB, 536x438)
290 KB PNG
I wonder how /o/ is doing this fine morning...
>>
>>29145642
The RWB thread degenerated into nonsense like this recently. Methinks it's competitive bots slugging it out.
>>
>>29145648
It's about to hit 400 posts!
>>29140733
>>
>>29145648
>The RWB thread degenerated
>RWB thread
>degenerated

Considering that the guy who spams those threads weekly is the same guy linking those posts around in circles for 200 replies - was the thread really that good from the start?
>>
>>29145670
It wasn't a good thread. You could count the quality posts on your hands.
>>
>>29145642
Still tripping a little bit and very hungover. Maybe gonna puke in the next hour.
>>
>>29143583
>an endless queue of wagons one after the other
Wouldn't it be more efficient to travel by train?
>>
>>29145602
see>>29145506
>>
>>29145710
source?
>>
>>29145726
see>>29145506
>>
>>29145728
source?
>>
>>29145742
see>>29145506
>>
>>29145750
Source?
>>
>>29145775
see>>29145506
>>
>>29145777
Source?
>>
>>29145777
Yo, I'd also like a source
>>
>>29145980
>>29146014
see>>29145506
>>
>>29146024
source?
>>
>>29146042
see>>29145506
>>
>>29146046
source?
>>
>>29146064
see>>29145506
>>
>>29146067
source?
>>
>>29146081
see>>29145506
>>
>>29146095
Source?
>>
>>29146136
see>>29145506
>>
>>29143730
Gurney raced the car just once, at Silverstone in May. He was right about the Impala. He built a considerable lead over the Jaguars before a broken rear wheel put him out of the race—on the last lap. He tried to enter the car in another saloon race later that summer, this time on upgraded NASCAR wheels, but was told the car did not meet FIA specs.
From Hot Rod magazine
>>
>>29146298
Source?
>>
>>29146360
see>>29145506
>>
>>29146376
source?
>>
>>29146385
see>>29145506
>>
>>29146390
source?
>>
>>29146414
see>>29145506
>>
>>29143583
Most of you maggot faggots weren't even alive back in the 90's, yet alone 60's.
>>
>>29146627
source?
>>
>>29146660
see>>29145506
>>
>>29146675
source?
>>
>>29146991
see>>29145506
>>
>>29147018
Source?
>>
>>29147032
see>>29145506
>>
>>29147054
source?
>>
>>29147068
see>>29145506
>>
>>29147088
source?
>>
>>29147095
see>>29145506
>>
>>29147098
Source
>>
>>29147117
see>>29145506
>>
>>29147121
source?
>>
>>29143583
round headlights should be made mandatory again
>>
>>29147138
see>>29145506
>>
>>29147146
it would make a lot of cars look like shit and clash horribly with modern design language.
>>
>>29147149
source?
>>
File: download.jpg (117 KB, 718x718)
117 KB JPG
>>
File: 1791490287164178.png (116 KB, 466x659)
116 KB PNG
>>29146317
>Gurney Impala
So it never won any race? Hahaha
>>
>>29147162
is that a fucking Gobbos from Croc?
>>
>>29147161
see>>29145506
>>
File: kekcroc.png (953 KB, 600x852)
953 KB PNG
>>29147198
It's a meme in more retarded parts of the retro gaming world called "scrimblo bimblo" that tries to satirize the '90s gaming mascot style. Sorta like Kekcroc. I never played Croc but googling it, yeah it looks like those Gobbos were likely the inspiration for little Scrimblo up there.
>>
>>29147284
source?
>>
>>29147297
see>>29145506
>>
>>29147388
source?
>>
>>29143583
imagine the smell
>>
>>29147393
see>>29145506
>>
>>29147404
source?
>>
>>29147696
see>>29145506
>>
>>29147723
source?
>>
>>29147738
see>>29145506
>>
>>29143735
I6s tend to be low revving and it's hard to get power out of them.
>>
>>29147740
Source?
>>
>>29137960
I heard that the Q/C of the Panthers had surpassed the B-bodies by the second half of the 80s. Seem to remember my grandmother bought an LTD after she heard in Consumer Reports that they had fewer issues and repairs reported than the B-bodies in owner survey data.
>>
>>29147799
idk it was probably pretty much the same. also by the late 80s the B-bodies were down to just the Caprice and wagons. both the B-body and Panther had their pluses and minuses.
>>
>>29147799
i suspect that could be because the LTD and Marquis had sequential multipoint injection by 86 while the B-bodies were still using a finicky electronic carburetor. Some people liked the carb better though.
>>
>>29147792
see>>29145506
>>
>>29147802
Ford and GM had it as policy (ditto Chrysler with the M-bodies) that only the absolute minimum investment was to be put into these cars because by late 80s they were ancient as shit platforms from the last decade.

>>29147804
Quite a few Caprices still had the infamous THM 200 transmission so that could have something to do with it.
>>
>>29147804
the Caprice offered the 4.2L V6 if you were interested in economy while Panthers were V8-only so there was also that



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.