With some predictions showing a decrease in human population in the coming decades does this mean there will be large swaths of land with no human activity or will corporations fill it all with taxpayer-funded robot cities or something.
>>2881072the only way to reduce human population to 2 billions is the use of nukes. hundreds or even thousand of nukes.
>>2881073Oil depletion, cometary near-misses, legitimate pandemics... you lack imagination.
>>2881074>>2881072idle daydreaming isn't a meaningful prediction; besides you should probably be more concerned about the back swing in public opinion about mental illness and social parasites combining with the advances in technology that allows objective measurement of mental illness getting you swept up into the new bug houses that will be getting built in the coming years.
>>2881086So does that mean we'll have more forests, or...?
>>2881090same amount of forest, but no homeless camps starting fires and dumping garbage on the edges of them.
>>2881091Yeah man the nonstop acceleration of climate change is just going to kill off the specific subgroups of people you dislike, of course. When in this timeline do you reckon you wake up?
>>2881093>didn't read the short thread, just spazed out and started screechinglol, human driven climate change isn't real son, but 'crazy' and 'retard' fatigue is.
When's the last time you hiked a wilderness area op? Pic related is Gila wilderness in New Mexico. Look it up. It's fucking massive. Half of Idaho is a wilderness area. If you want to go to a place without roads or people it's actually pretty easy to do here in the USA. Surely you go backpacking in wilderness areas all the time if you hold this reddit opinion so dear.
>>2881073If we have a year where the world only produces enough food for 2 billion people, then at the end of that year there will not be more than 2 billion people in the world.
>>2881095>Half of Idaho is a wilderness area.Yeah but is is connected wilderness where I can walk and camp freely, or just little pockets interspersed with ranches and logging properties that'll shoot me for crossing their fences?
population ain’t gonna decrease without some world ending event.
>>2881073>>2881192We can already reduce human population just by running an accurate census on countries where statistics are extrapolated, untrustworthy or both.
>>2881072>corporationsclaude will own the entire planetwe will live inside a ultra-hi-tech hunter gatherer society
>>2881073Dysgenic breeding unchecked by harsh Darwinian selection pressures suppressed by technological innovations found in compute complex civilisation assures civilisation will collapse once sufficiently intelligent people are too few in the population to sustain these technologies. Food chain and disease control collapses, billions die. Already happened in the past. This is a cycle.
>>2881072That will never happen because then line will go down which is bad for muh economyThey will just import millions of the nigerians or whatever other country is predicted to have population booms to fill in the gapsReally is a shame, overgrown cities would be such unique ecosystems. You already have 50 year old soil crusts on parking lots in NYC which now grow xeric plants like cactuses. I can imagine little lizards climbing into the cracks of pavement and overgrown lawns looking like praries.
>>2883349There will be plenty of abandoned cities. It's cheaper to bulldoze a field or forest flat than it is to destroy old buildings or roads.
