Rank the Trump Portraits
>>44321143>1>4>>>>>>>22 is so boring get it out of here
>>44321144 looks better in almost every way on paper, but 3 is somehow better. Why is this? Is it the lighting?
>>4432117I think it's the visible signs of stroke
>>4432114all trash
>>4432117the pose
3 - staged with intent. goofy tho. needs edits.4 - same. ai?1 - tv appearance? meh. ok.2 - chaos.
>>44321141>Did I shit myself?2>Oh thank god I'm wearing my incontinence underwear3>No, wait. That soaked through4>Nggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
>>4432167(You) would have got updoots for this on rddit!
>>4432114>ears out of focus ah nice and cinematic
2 might be the worst in terms of photography but he looks like a nice person there.
4 looks a fucking racist
>>44321144 makes him look way more intellectual and serious than he actually isthat is not the face of a man that wants to invest in fossil fuels, ban criticism of a foreign racist ethnostate, and import scab labor from india while deporting scab labor to mexico. he looks like fucking noam chomsky.
2>4>1>3
>>44321143 looks like a fuckterrible HDR-meme edited photo by a boomer. All it needs are ken Rockwell memecolors, and a Comic Sans MS font somewhere to make it even more boomercore.
>>4432167that aint biden tho and his grapefruit sized prostate kek
>>4432645>he looks like fucking noam chomskybased
>>4432114>let's bump up the texture on this old man>it definitely won't make him look like a mummymodern portrait photographers need to run around with a film camera for a bitless = more
>>4432114https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_portraits_of_Donald_TrumpWhy does he have so many?
>>44321144 looks like they actually captured the look that the absolute amateur was going for in 3. The first two are basic but passable.
this is better than all 4
>>4433282This is the best Trump photograph ever taken.
>>44321143 is nice, I'm currently experimenting with harsh light myself. Dunno if it fits a presidential portrait but it's certainly a dramatic style.4 is very interesting, I'm not sure I've ever seen some shoot a portrait that wide open (on purpose) that only the front of the head is even in focus. I should try that sometime, looks kinda cinematic to be honest. Like one of those scenes where a character wakes up from being unconscious or something
What's a good lens to cover protests and riots? I'm considering the FUJINON XF18-55mmF2.8-4 R LM OIS I'm usually shooting an 18mm prime but it might be good to get some distance for this
Or the FUJINON XF18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR
>>4433667Sounds like a good focal length>>4433668don't like this because I think riot photos are stronger if you go closer to the action rather than cowardly zooming from behind the police linealso 50mm is nicer to take photos from further away (picrel)
>>4433674Very nice photo. I agree and prefer to be at 18mm distance but I can see from footage and experience that there are situations where this isn't an option. I have no idea if 55mm is enough or not because I never shoot a lens like this
Am I figuring this right? Full body shot at 30ft with 85mm full frame and at 100ft with 270mm? Holy crap
>>4433680Forgot to post the picture of my nuts
>>4433681That sounds fucked, but I'm not smart enough and don't care enough to actually go check or do math
>>4433683The other thing I could do is not look at this, which sounds really good also. The 18-135 looks like it's just a little bit longer than the 18-55
I don't think I would want to keep any photos that were taken at 1:35. They look like telescope pictures.
>>4433667Waiting for your kino shots anon
>>44321141 = Garbage2 = Garbage3 = Garbage4 = GarbageOnly a retard would think any of these look good. This is the leader of the free world, and his portraits are forever sloppified by shit retard photofaggotraphers and their infinite desire to overbake images with shit tier post-processing and "enhancements".These might as well all be fucking AI generated because they don't even look professional.>what we deserveTimeless B&W film negatives>what we should have gotten100MP color digitial with studio flashes and no gay over-baking>what we gotsome shitty trash that looks like it came from a smartphoneThis is not okay.They need to release the RAWs.
>>4432114>1: class portrait>2: iphone>3: called in his relative who everyone thinks is a photographer (i can see the ISO noise/high ISO shadow crush and sharpening halos from here, and it's only the palm sized version)>4: AI generated turtle trumpis he just not photogenic, has photography fallen this far, or is it because every decent photographer is required to side with outspoken liberals if they want to keep their career and they're meant to boycott trump or something?
>>4433689I was watching some videos about the riots in California and it's so fucking gay how people go to protest to pose in hope of being in some iconic photoSelf absorbed as fuckevery video you see there's some rando posing doing a handsight or whatever and 4 photogs swirling around them taking pics like japanese touristsit's fake and gay
>>4434017We have truly entered the Age of CloutI expect royallties, Civ 8 devs.
eventually you will meet a man named Babu
>>4433965You don't really need anything more than the latest smartphone and Lightroom these days. Anything more is masturbatory jackassery for pixel hunters
>>4434017modern protesting is just cosplaying as a terrorist and doing gang signs
>>4434197>the bus and bike lanes are so fast you dont need a car! you masturbatory tiny dick speed racer!Get a job, al.
>>4434210Normal people don't care about high ISO pixel dotting and color halos dude, they care about visually striking pics and aesthetics. Only /p/etards give a shit about unnoticeable anamorphic subsampling artifacts. The average Joe is going to prefer the colorful Ken Rockwell image over boring, flat shitpix taken by autistic gearfags. Enjoy your monochrome snaps bro, I'm sure they're a hit at the nursing home lmao
>>4434213>bla bla blaStop coping. Get a job. Everyone prefers real cameras to phones. The only obstacles are cost ($500 for a decent micro four turds setup is appalling to 80% of americans, theyre leveraged to the tits) and fashion/convenienceit does not help that the more fashionable and convenient cameras are the most expensive
>>4434213if this was even 1% true then blumhouse would just shoot their movies on iphones, you think they give a shit?there is a noticeable difference to anyone who isn't retarded between a camera and a phone
>>4434213Normal people give up when they see the pricetags for anything thats both effortlessly good (modern apsc at least, not old canon m/ricoh gr apsc) and easy/non embarrassing to carry>inb4 autist: skill issue i shoot raw and bracket on my four thirds blob. it matches my cargo shorts.
>>4434224>I-I make bad financial decisions and... AND SO SHOULD YOU! AARRRRGH!Lmao. Only broke niggas wealth check this way. Just put the fries in the bag little bro>>4434225What is "28 Years Later" for 500, Alex? LolSmartphones are the future of photography and moviemaking. Mobile technology will keep improving while you flannel finooks play around with overpriced camera setups for a 1% improvement in DoF quality noticeable only on 4k monitors zoomed in by 800%It's not the quality that matters, it's how you use it ;)
>>4434228>omg i cant afford that so no one can! you could have given the money you spent on a car to me!Get a job. Holy shit.Get. A. Job. That is all.
>>4434228yes you totally arent the fry cook. saving money by coping about real cameras is clearly your sole path to financial freedom and the very make or break moment that will define the rest of your adult life. you have to be right, its totally not because you cant "justify" (afford) the small, stylish, high performing camera you want. you know what? its because you are a master investor and that small chunk of change is just what you need to be a millionaire! two more weeks! To the moon! You’re the money master!(I am being sarcastic. You are unemployed)
>>4432114>1. Meh whatever>2. Shit eating grin>3. 14 year old trying to look edgy for his Facebook profile>4. Basically the same as 3 but with different lighting
>>4434228cameras aren't even expensiveother than leicas everything tops out at $4,000 for a photography bodya phone costs $2000how is it much of a difference>but my phone costs $20you are a broke ass nigga and have no bitches then'
>>4434230>I spent 8000 dollars for something that could be done with 800! this will surely own the /p/honechads!You got scammed by Big Lens dude. Hate to break it to you but that rare Nikon lens from the 60s you bought on Etsy wasn't actually developed with lunar regolith collected from the apollo mission and consecrated with sasquatch blood for reduced ISO infetterance. That's slightly less pathetic than spending loads of dosh on fake JordansStop posting you're just embarrassing yourself lmao>>4434231Bro's psychoanalyzing off-topic like he just lost a youtube comment section debate LOL
>>4434235>big lenstake your meds
>>4434235>lunar regolith collected from the apollo mission>sasquatchcan't tell which one is the bigger hoax
>>4434245That's exactly what I'm saying lmao. These guys keep falling for scams and try to shame you for not falling for the biggest con. Really fuckin sad to see these guys bite the gear fraud hook, line and sinker. Barrelbrained behavior t b h
>>4434245>>4434247These guys know what's up. I work at CNN and they just use smart phones to record news broadcasts now. Cameras are pseudoscientific and look worse than a $20 android phone
>>4434235tldr get a job
>>4434249to be fair that's only done so they can fake more stuff on the go, smartphones would be more aptly called slyphones
>signs you may be developmentally delayed:>when other, wealthier men spend money you dont have, you get angry at them for "wasting money"an adult could recognize that the wealthier men are their superiors. but you are not an adult. you have the mindset of an autistic child who thinks adults are dumb for buying houses because you’re fine living in your room. it is time for you to grow up and realize the adults are your superiors. you sat on your ass. we succeeded. you can’t balance a budget and simply fear spending money. we can keep track of our finances and can simultaneously save, earn, and spend and come out wealthier than you regardless. it is time for you to accept this. it is time for you to grow up.
>>4434256TLDR learn financial responsibility, critical thinking and the most valuable skill of making well reasoned decisions. Jeremy Fragrance goes over this in his guides>>4434257The devil is in the 1% of detail smartphones don't cover. They're WAY more noticeable on the Ari Aster Mini camera than smartphones but it's inconsequential to honest photographers>>4434258It's not anger I'm just pointing out that you got scammed lmao. Keep posting incel fanfiction
>>4434259Get a job kid
>>4434258ironically you don't even have to be wealthy to own a cameraI have a $30,000 Leica and I'm a NEET
>>4434264You snap with a $300 secondhand Fujifilm cam with $5k in gear. I snap with a $1.5k Sony Xperia 1 V. You want to know my job? That's my job lol. Photography is a man's game and if you can't make money in a man's game you should just put the fries in the bag, because it's over for you. Go back to muckraking on grandpa's farm and ask for an allowance for your lens wipes lmao
>No way could full frame be better than my toy camera>Everyone must be a scam victim but me! I have monetary sense!No you have a poor sense of scale due to a lifetime of poverty.
>>4434272I'm a full time photographer. I take pictures with my 2009 iPhone, nobody, literally nobody, can tell the difference between the photos and those from your camera. You wasted money boomer.
>>4434274Oh man, now you're lying. I'm revising my narrative from lifetime of poverty to 30 years of no sex.You know, you're not smart when people on the internet actually think you're stupid. You're just really pathetic. It's like you pulled down your pants in public to revel in the jeers.>They could just ignore me, but no, they tell me to put my pants on! RENT FREE I WINMan, have sex. Seriously. And no, not with your dog.
>>4434275he doesn't realize he's not trolling. he keeps going because the responses hurt.
>>4434276Well yes, he's here every day because the responses inevitably hit a little too close to home lol.
>>4434275Sex is a fucking scam. Using my hand feels just as good. You boomers get scammed into paying for dates and shit when you could just be jerking off, pathetic.
>>4434277Kek this. He must have had his jimmies rustled if he keels coming back. Are you actually poor anon?
>>4434275>And no, not with your dogDon't invoke dogfucking in any context, not even as a joke to own the poor phonefaggot. There are worse posters lurking /p/ that you don't want to attract.
>>4434280 #Never forget the poster who thought the dog pictures here were uncomfortably suggestive
>>4434286Exactly. Just mentioning specific things summons certain anons like evil spirits. Someone mentioned a niche topic earlier and a particular tripfag showed up. They comb the archives. They never sleep.
>>4434289Crop your cropped pixel pitch equivalence for reach
>>4434290Noooooooooooo. Es ist verboten!
Why did this thread turn into a bunch of faggots whining
>>4434650In fairness that's every thread that isn't /fgt, /rpt/ or people's personal threads
>>4432114Two is the best, makes him look like a cartoon dad.4 is literally hitler.
>>4434650It's 4chang
>>4434867this1, 3 and 4 just make think of Ben Stiller in Zoolander too much
>>4436397pic related
>>4434197You are a poor retard.>>4434213They don't, until they do.The single most important thing for normies is whether an image looks good. Most of this is subject, but if the subject/light is good they can then appreciate quality or be disappointed.Most image quality comes from the lens, next the image processing, then the sensor quality.Smartphones fail at the lens but so did old point and shoots, they don't fail bad enough to complain about unless it's for portraits or important shit. Snapshots, they're fine. Biggest issue with this is people DON'T CLEAN THEIR LENSES but clean phone lenses are good enough for most things, including landscapes.Smartphones majorly fail at the image processing. This is what defines "the look" of the image beyond the subject/lighting and is where things go horribly wrong. You can get around this by using 3rd party apps and shooting RAW but most don't bother, and wind up with the "Samsmug" or "Applel" or "HuaWHY" look on their images and then blame it on the lens, and think a new one will do better, and it doesn't, it's just more of the same with different post-process/ai shit and they become repeat customers never understanding why their images look so fake.Smartphone sensors are actually good enough for a lot of things but for single-shot (no bracketing or multi-sampling possible to increase IQ+DR) capture they are a bit too noisy, and this results in copium attempts at de-noising, and this just circles back into shit image processing with fake looking NR artifacts. In a well lit scene within the DR of the sensor (not extreme contrast) and for a subject that doesn't require cropping/digital zooming, they're fine.Problem is people want to crop/zoom, not shoot RAW, and shoot under shit lighting, never use a tripod, never clean their lens, and shoot without blocking sources of glare, so it all adds up to BAD. Mostly user error, but a good chunk is the device.Used $100 DSLRs do better in the hands of retards.
Should have an Israel flag behind him
>>4434213normal people careyou think 12 people on /p/ and another 50 between fredmiranda and dpreview prop up the camera industryor literally anyone who has a mac or a computer with a screen about as good
>>4436457>they're fineLolno. They look turbo shit. Phone photos have a look, just like HDR cope always did and still does.
>>4438895And anyone who prints. All but the best chinkdroid phone cameras shot in raw produce worse looking prints than the sooc jpegs than a point and shit from 2011. the phone look stands out, bigtime, unless its a boring photo with no detail of note ie: office building, car.
Unless you bought some ccp spyware slab with a 1" sensor that only works on asian networks, phone lenses and sensors are not good enough. They are worse than most older compacts, but they have auto HDR. Better to choose a phone thats better at being a phone and get a ricoh gr or sony zv1 or something. save your phone battery. take photos that are out of the reach of global corporations.
>>4433328This one yeah GOAT>>4433282This goes hard tho
Does anyone know where the full body shot of the portrait comes from?
>>4438888chcked
>>44321143 is the best one.
>>44321144 is def the bestwould say 1 is second just because it was the first one and was funny at the time2 is kinda boring3 is shitty, one of his eyes looks way too bigger than the other to the point where it's weird
4 > 3 > 1 > 2
>>4436397>>4436398kek
>>4432167so brave sister
2 is the only good one3&4 look like something a jeet would spew out after making a Darth Donald meme portrait 1 is shit
>>4433282You only need someone mimicking trump like Newsom to really get how pathetic he is
>>4465526trvmp won troony
>>4432117bokeh abuse
>>44321141. Pedophile getting away with it but nervous AF. 2. Holyfuk I did it, back to being the buffoon desperate for attention.3. lol we rigged the Supreme Court, time to commit unlimited fraud & theft from the taxpayers. 4. Spineless repubs allowing me to do everything, no reason not to destroy civil rights, Due Process, Habeus Corpus, separation of powers, become a powerdrunk wannabe tinpot dictator wantonly committing crimes against Constitution & even the Declaration of Independence, and start attacking US cities bc Heritage Foundation wants to send southern confederate states armies marching and attacking the north, so fuck it let’s burn the motherfucker down. 4 is the best, obv, & best bc there’s now no question, like his cabinet, he’s due to be dragged out of a ditch & strung up just like Saddam, shouting about his greatness to the burned bodies of his gullible traitorous cult worshippers with their small arms, as the rope snaps tight and the whipped horses rend him his rotten fucking guts on the front lawn of the White House, saving him from the lengthy misery of cancer. That’s the future they’re working toward in the time of that photo.
>>4466539The irony of a maskcuck alleging Trump is authoritarian and a pedo>And by the way, you know, I sit on the stand, and it's getting hot, I've got hairy legs that turn — that — that — that turn — um, blonde in the sun. And the kids used to come up and reach in the pool and rub my leg down so it was straight and watch the hair come back up again. They'd look at it. So, I learned about roaches, I learned about kids jumping on my lap, and I've loved kids jumping on my lap.
>>4466539rent free
>>4466539and thank god i was getting sick of so called principlesdo what makes sense. fuck principles.
>>44321143>4>2>1
>>4466588You guys are gonna LOVE it when this administration is removed from office and an actual leftist strolls in, and instead of shutting down all these same abuses of power, makes them their own, and uses them against right wingers, orgs and causes. If you had any idea the fucking hurricane you’re inviting upon yourselves by being so shortsighted & greedy, amassing absolute unchecked power in the hands of one single position for a few short years…. well you wouldn’t be a fucking Republican lol. Every day, every abuse, we’re just adding it all to the list, & each is another action we’re going to take, run with, amplify even further and destroy you. So enjoy that rigged Supreme Court, obliterated human rights, concentration camps, & military occupation right now, while you’re still on the outside. You’re about to be guilty bc we fucking say you are & oh look at that the SC ruling says you get no due process so enjoy being “lost” in an Ugandan cell lolAll bc baby is afraid of the doctor wahhhhh.
>>4466862>Surely, principles and precedents!What you are describing would set off a civil war before it left step one.An actual liberal would just restart biden's agenda and keep on siphoning money from the people and prioritizing corporate profits AKA jobs numbers and the GDP.
>>4466862you're basically saying "you cant put the japanese in internment camps. YOU'LL BE NEXT BECAUSE EQUALITY IS LAW AND PRECEDENT IS GOD!"america does not actually work like that and never has.all the moralizing is a facade, like china pretending to be humanist.
>>4466869>but if the left does what we’re doing it’d be warThat is already the objective. What the fuck do you think the point of sending our armies into northern cities is, peace and brotherly love? No one expected LA to be such a dud, but going in uninvited to Chicago should turn every window on every city street into a snipers nest, and as soon as they take out the Texas Guard, it’s full-on race war. The time to start paying attention to the cause was 1997 when Gingrich adopted It nationally. US was already a dead republic by 1976, & has no future but war and the total breakup of the union. We’ve been stockpiling ammo for 20 years for this, and thank god Trump came along & is Red Caesar, finally putting our revolutionaries in power to make it happen. Starting with the non-whites, then solidify the Christian States vs Mormons next door, take all the $ back from the Jewish banks, while we chain those negro Baptists back in the fields where they belong, & crush the North for a century of aggression & oppression against us. If you’re not part of the plan, you better pick a side. There’s gonna be a million great opportunities for photography coming up fast but choose the wrong side and you won’t live to see yer little picture book published.
>>4466876In reality, nothing will happen.>no, it will, because THESE ACTIONS ARE UNAMERICAN AND WRONG!Right. And everyone marched down and blew up the NSA when snowden got leaky too.>BUT THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY? VALUES?These things don't actually matter people just want material gains. Holy wars only happen for holy things. No religion no jihad. The arbitrary bullshit of the founding fathers has consistently been proven to not be worth fighting for.No one is even going to be taking kino photos. Just 200mm+ snapshots. All of the people who are well armed, and have something to fight for... aren't being targeted. And don't care. And will remain untargeted if they don't take photos. In fact, all of the people who are well armed, and have something to fight for, are on the feds side.Your big political waterslide doesn't even have a ladder for people to get up there. Your dreams of being an important revolutionary will never come true. You are just going to be another person saying "oh yeah that happened" about... internment camps, american eugenics, the repatriation of the mexicans...
>>4466869>an actual liberal would just restart biden's agenda>doesn’t know the difference between leftist & liberal>thinks Biden was “liberal”>heard the word “agenda” & thought it sounded convincing even though has no fucking idea what its referring to>sure as hell thinks he’s got some shit to say that everyone needs to hear thoThis is why you should really do yourself the favor of just speaking for your own dumbass position instead of showing everyone in half a sentence how spectacularly you don’t understand your opposition. You have no fucking idea what awaits you now. You’d better hope you defeat democracy & rig the maps to prevent representative gov from ever unseating you again, bc nigga nobody wants to go backward, they want blood first and a new country second.wait…>…of siphoning money from the peoplelol lololol. LOLOLOLOLOOLOLLLLOLLOL HOLY fuck are you in for a brutal awakening the day you learn of the 30 trillion dollars of gov spending your openly corrupt thief in chief has just racked up for you and the next 5 generations of your doomed offspring to pay for, as he lined his pockets with billions right on up the Forbes richest list in the last 8 months. But yeah, tell me more about Biden, who Repubs investigated 14 fuckin times straight & cleared every time bc they never found any trace of corruption or involvement in his pathetic junkie ass sons attempt to cash in on the family name. Wow really scored big on that one didn’t ya. But her emaiiils, meanwhile Trump family runs all their emails on their own private servers & destroys digital & physical records legally req’d to go to library of congress in their spree of lawlessness..Nope, the libs lost, and handed you all the rope last election, and you immediately hung yourselves with it. Good job, maybe some more pump & dump crypto scams will fix tanking the economy, or you know, just click your heels together & pray lol.
>>4466879Oh woops I thought you were more normal and not a wignatI accidentally read your post. Didn't meant to do that. Still nothing will happen. It's another great american nothingburger. Because the people on the feds side are just going "lol" and watching. No religion no jihad. Put down the gun and put your pants back on. The enemy you thought you had was just a bunch of common criminals. The allies you thought they had live by "dont care got mine".It's a real shame we won't get much kino because feds and cops literally hate photography but it is what it isBust out that 100-400 if you want to maybe get something
>>4466880>bla bla bla its the end of the world because muh magic debt numbersI don't think you understand, this matters as much as I care.>WAR IS COMINGNo, people just want doordash.
>>4466876I’m ready. The tards on the right are only armed with small arms bc they’re still culturally stuck in the 1940s and think they’re going to be GI Joe Marlboro Man like all the movies they watched where “one man with a gun” saves the status quo. You’re going to find out how much more dangerous technology has enabled people to become. March your fatass armies on the north and attack Chicago. Do it faggots, it’s gonna be fun.
>>4466884To be fair, it doesn’t really matter that the people want DoorDash, Hegseth wants civil war. He wrote about it at length in his book. So do Vance, Miller, Bannon, Noem, Honan, several SC Justices, & their big Tech donors. The ppl who want war are now in the position to make it happen and are paving the way institutionally & legally (or rather breaking down the legal protections). They’ve been very excited to name Dems, liberals, Rino’s, and blue cities & states as legit military targets, themselves as perpetual victims, & as of yesterday, it isn’t the Dept of Defense anymore, it’s the Dept or War, though war has not been declared on any foreign nation. I now return you to your regularly scheduled territorial pissings.
>>4466886>reality when some above average IT nerd causes more damage with an injection attack at the right place at the right time, than the two most accurate hitmen this side of the Mississippi armed with the best rifles money can buy>can't photograph a remote hack; most boomers can't email effectively let alone understand what a hack really can do>photograph of a wingnut with an AR15 and beeg scope on it garners more attention than evidence of a major cyber attack crippling an entire section of the economy/military/essential infrastructureTurns out imagery is a powerful tool insofar as people can understand it. Trvmp is ubiquitous with the right-wing agenda so if you can get a photo of him holding a M700 it'll both be analagous to Pootin riding a donkey armed with a Saiga, and be far more impactful than reality ever could to these old fucks.Except wait, AI imagery exists and anyone over 40 doesn't give a fuck / doesn't care about the difference and now we can have infowars with zero effort because being born before 1985 means you're a gullible retard.
>>4466887>t-the world is ending! war is coming!Which country's propaganda are you swallowing? Or shitting out?You live in the US right? It's just barracks warmers frisking sketchy looking black people
>>4433282>>4433328politics aside these are iconic. the second is a photojournalist's wet dream.
why so much seething ITT?
>>4433667Journos have unironically been using Sony for a while, even >>4433328 was with a Sony. I'm not sure I've ever seen a Fuji used by any professional, everything is just Canon and Sony from my experience.Source: worked in real estate, commercial and portrait photography
>>4469956>Sony>Sony>Fuji>Canon and Sonythey're all the same nobody cares
>>4432114I find 3 best of the bunch. 1 a snap 2 insincere 3 almost as good as the mugshot, 4 somethging in lighting annoys me and short focus does not make it better.>>4469954murricans + politics.(I unironically like this one.)
>>4432114I think 4 looks the best, looks kinda old timey, as if it were shot in Kodachrome or was a colored black and white photo.
>>4466539>s named tyler with a tranny boyfriend
>>4469991It's AI
>>4469991>>4471640The people in positions of power are already using AI and people are falling for it. Soon enough people will realize photography is an art, not an imprint of truth. And they will realize that most "photojournalism" is actually propaganda photography, not real journalism as well. Or so I hope. When you realize the pictures that you see aren't necessarily representing reality, you start valuing them as art, for their own sake. Especially after C2PA has been exposed as the FRAUD it is.
>>4471640Yes it's AI and it's more interesting that the actual portraits taken by real people. Sad, isn't it. >>4471647Only the mugshot is representing reality.
