[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Who the fuck likes this focal length? What is its purpose?
>>
File: DSC_3097.jpg (3.51 MB, 2832x4256)
3.51 MB
3.51 MB JPG
28mm filters out the bokehfags and gearfags, if you need 100mm f0.95 to make good pictures you suck
>>
>>4462881
you forgot to mention that you are a fat retard like you always do
>>
>>4462866
Fat people like it because it makes them look skinnier
>>
>>4462881
This would be really compelling if the person saying it had a shred of evidence that they'd ever taken a good photo at any focal length, let alone 28mm. Go be fat somewhere else.
>>
File: ContactSheet-001.jpg (1.26 MB, 2000x3000)
1.26 MB
1.26 MB JPG
>>4462866
28 is dope
>>
4462884
4462888

>Provide evidence slamming no-talent hacks and a decent photo taken at 28mm
>ad hominem

Never change 4chan incels
>>
28mm 1.4 is pretty fun though. I'll post some later.
>>
>>4462893
Tag me properly you retarded fatass. No one is using ad-hominem. You presented a photo, it fucking sucks. Everyone can see it fucking sucks. I tell you it fucking sucks, and that the rest of your photos fucking suck. I also tell you that your argument would be more compelling if you presented relevant information, and that there is no evidence that you have relevant information (good photos). Fucking think for once, you post like Brian Griffin. Everything goes over your head and you strut around like a winner. It's small wonder that recent poll put you as the most hated person here.
>>
4462897
>Where are my (YOU'S)! WHAAAAAH!!!
>>
>>4462897
i like his photo :) i think its pretty good

28mm is one of my favorite focal lengths actually half my shots on a kit zoom are 28-35mm
>>
>>4462897
The poll that was so fake an israeli fed paid a random brazilian $3 to bot it?
>>
>>4462898
>>4462902
>receives criticism
>cognitive dissonance, brain turns off
>well im just going pretend that didnt happen im actually the best and also im barely even 200kgs and smell like onions
>>
>>4462898

>Someone actually defending me
>mfw

4462903

Ad hominem isn't criticism it's just called being a faggot
>>
I don't like 28mm that much either, 24 or 35 is often much better. I like it on crop though.
>>
>>4462881
oh no I agreed with Sugar on something. It feels wrong
>>
what are the best 28mm for Nikon z ?
>>
File: MDR_7747-edit-BW-7-6.jpg (1.7 MB, 1680x1440)
1.7 MB
1.7 MB JPG
I honestly haven't used it much and I'm having a hard time adjusting to it for some reason. I actually find it easier to go wider, and I don't even do that very often. Picrel is the "best" 28mm shot I've taken lately.
>>
>>4462881
this is a good photo and this guy here >>4462897 knows how to describe himself:
>Everything goes over your head and you strut around like a winner.

Anyway, try using wide angles indoors or in cramped spaces.
>Who likes it?
Boomers love wide angles.
>>
>>4462905
>>4462929
Nah kill just kill yourself man
>>
>>4462937
you are very impolite
>>
File: DSCF6691bw.jpg (1.11 MB, 3000x2000)
1.11 MB
1.11 MB JPG
i like 28 for groups of peopel and close quarters
>>
>>4462897
>Tag me properly
>Tag me
>Tag
>>
File: Garry.jpg (249 KB, 1000x658)
249 KB
249 KB JPG
>>4462866
It is better than 35mm that is never enough wide or tight. At least 28mm is always wide enough to pack everything in to frame. 35mm and 50mm is for photographers than can not take a good picture so they rely on the dof to save them.
>>
Utter garbage, the Winogrand length and phonefag length. Snapshittery is all it's good for. It's one of the many reasons Leica Q pix sux so much. K3k!
The underwater photo is good because being underwater actually changes the effective focal length by a 4:3 factor. A 28 underwater behaves like a 37 outside, roughly 35. In other words, a 28 is what you need to be uncle Terry in the depths.
>>
What are you saying, it’s too wide or too tight, it seems like a very natural looking frame to see
>>
28 is just right. 24 gets distorted, 35 is just meh. Perfect wide-angle.
>>
File: 1137c-0832.jpg (874 KB, 1000x667)
874 KB
874 KB JPG
>>4463129

>Gear made this photo good

Spoken like a true gearfag, Helmut Newton and Daido Moriyama worked in 28mm, do they suck too?
>>
>>4462897
>It's small wonder that recent poll put you as the most hated person here
It was literally a samefag schizo that voted the same options multiple times
>>
>>4463124
shhh, retard
>>
>>4463157
well yes
>>
>>4463159
You know for a fact that's a cope. Every time you post here you're met with hate. You're an incredibly hard person to like.
>>
>>4463173
Yes, keep on making up nonsense and samefagging to agree with yourself. Literally nobody here cares but you. You're a sad individual.
>>
>>4463181
>th-the poll was f-fake!!!
>th-they hacked it to make me look bad!!!
Do you see how retarded you sound?
>>
>>4463188
Bro some guy literally said he paid a brazillian $3 to put in 20 votes or whatever
>>
That poll wasn't just shitposting? Someone is actually taking those results as gospel? Like our local schizos don't have enough meaningless spam material as it is.

Shit, I wanna be schizo too. Who's ring do I kiss?
>>
>>4463192
>>4463193
>a-anyone who says it didn't get magically hacked is schizophrenic guise!!!
Why not just accept the obvious truth that literally no one likes you. No need to do mental gymnastics about how "the site got hacked by your stalkers" when the explanation is obvious. People who try to steer the discussion of an anonymous photography forum to be about themselves, their life, and how special they are, are generally socially stunted man-children. People just don't wanna hear from you.
>>
>>4463205
No, strawpolls are fake as fuck. Anyone with a VPN or a phone with an airplane mode toggle can spam votes.

>>4460343
>>4460352
>>
>>4463211
Personally, I think it's one or two really obsessed guys that don't even post photos, which makes the whole thing even sadder.
>>
You're a schizo. Brazillian dude is the only guy who came out with any benefit to the poll
>>
>$3.50 for 6 high value (you)s
Was it worth it? The expenditures of the leica man are simply disgusting...
>>
>>4463157
Helmut mostly shot longer lengths, 28mm is far from representative of his work. Moriyama does indeed suck.
I reject your gearfag claim, it's the AoV/perspective and even if your gear was brushes and paint it would be the same.
>>
>>4463157
In photography, using the correct gear for the photo does in fact determine if a photo is good or bad.

You shot a 35mm portrait due to optical tricks. 28mm above ground is really tacky and overdone.
>>
>>4463129
>>4463221
shouldn't you be talking about dogs in some other thread
>>
>>4463193
>Nobody likes you because of a poll!
>Poll is fake
>Wait n-nobody took the poll s-seriosly i was only pretending to be retarded!!!!!
>Samefags himself in agreement
>>
>>4462866
Phones



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.