> NATIVE 35mm f1.7 main lens with 1 inch sensor> Dedicated two-step shutter button> Co-developed with Zeiss using Zeiss lens coatings. > Global releaseAnyone else going to buy this beast? This phone will replace an X100V.
>>4495591Phone cameras have mogged bulky overpriced mirrorless cameras for a few years now.
>>4495593I just can't stand the pleb 23mm main cameras that every phone has.
>>4495596Its ironic in the 2000s every digital camera was 35mm and people wanted 28mm and then eventually 24mm and now people want 35mm again
>>4495591>NATIVE 35mm f1.7 main lens with 1 inch sensorSo you mean a 10mm f/5 lens?
>>4495591Xiaomi has been doing this with Leica for years.
Zeiss lenses are awesome. Something to do with darker colours and how they turn to black
>>4495605>hel fell for the NPC zeiss pop meme
>>4495600Only at 23mm. Native 35mm is so much better.
>>4495623nubia has had native 35mm for years too
PLEASE come to T-Mobile I'll buy one.I have a Pixel 7 Pro that has a fairly decent camera but 1" sensor on something like that, with Zeiss lenses? I'm absolutely there, ultimate travel setup.
>>4495626True but the image samples I've seen are pretty poor. The rest of the phone is kinda buggy too apparently. >>4495628You'll probably have to buy one SIM-free. I know USA has retarded cellular bands as well so double check before buying. I think T-Mobile is actually one of the better ones to use.
so apparently they're available for purchase and DxO already reviewed it.https://www.dxomark.com/vivo-x300-pro-camera-test/HOLY SHIT, iToddler's BTFO with no recovery
>>4495630That is the Pro not the ultra. The Ultra has the 35mm lens and (I think) a bigger sensor?
>>4495591Too thick for comfortable pocket storage. Without a lens cap(EVEN THICKER) or the lenses being set back in a phone case those bitches will constantly be dirty take shitty pictures.Maybe one day they'll have a non gay or retarded "good camera" in a cellphone design. Sigh.
>>4495632holy cope
>>4495664>not an argumentStating facts is not cope. I bet you'll keep your blobmera tier phone in your purse lol
>>4495667>Ahhhhhhh its so big and bulky i better being my entire mirrorless setup over this instead i am literally going insane!!!!
>>4495591Good to know this exists because I too hate the 23mm main cameras. No phone fully replaces a digicam for people like me who dislike touch interfaces but it does mean I won't use my RX100 as much. The digicams have physical stabilization which makes a difference in low light and real flashes but I definitely prefer the in camera HDR on smartphones versus messing around with raw files. If they have a 23 or thereabout also with a 1" sensor as part of the camera stack, that is very compelling. >>4495628Also on Pixel 7 Pro which I don't like all that much so this new phone is looking like a good replacement candidate.>>4495599wrong equivalency. 10mm f/1.7 is equivalent to FF 35mm f/5. Definitely not a replacement for the X100V's 35mm f/2.8 equivalent. Not far from the GR's 28 or 40mm f/4 though.
>>4495591No example images?
>>4495686literally a few posts down in the link, brainlet
>>4495685>I hate 23mm cameras>if they also have a 23mm with a 1" sensorYou are stupid as fuck. They cannot have multiple 1" sensors on a single phone. you are a retarded gear queer with no idea about photography in the slightest
>>4495683Yeah I'm calling that a purse phone for sure. Looks nigh unpocketable tbqhwy.
>>4495702Not an issue for me because unlike you I dont wear XXXS skinny jeans
