[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images(82).jpg (18 KB, 757x405)
18 KB
18 KB JPG
Redpill me on screen vs viewfinder debate.

Personally I find screen to be way more comfortable. Viewfinder is a total pain in the ass.
>>
>>4497897
This is dumb bait and not a "conversation". Use what you want dumbass
>>
>>4497897
Anyone who actually uses the viewfinder over the screen is simply a child larping as an army man looking down the rifle scope. The viewfinder offers absolutely no advantages over the screen and anyone who uses it looks immature.
>>
>>4497900
You are why we don’t allow women and fags to have rights, mashallah. Muhammad was right about many things.

>>4497897
Viewfinders are more usable in bright light and make it easier to hold the camera steady for long exposures or tracking moving subjects.
>>
>>4497900
>>4497902
Also when debating EVF vs the rear screen the EVF is often better quality, higher res, OLED with greater dynamic range, and higher refresh rate.
>>
File: 1646019669220.gif (832 KB, 829x728)
832 KB
832 KB GIF
>>4497900
This. So Much This.
>>
File: el troon.jpg (91 KB, 634x804)
91 KB
91 KB JPG
>>4497900
this poster is going to commit a mass shooting while dressed as a woman, 100%
>>
Slightly more stupid "debate" than 35mm vs 50mm
>>
Despite having video monitors, movie directors still use the traditional optical viewfinder on the camera to get a precise idea of colours, framing and lighting. A video monitor/evf can be deceptive in all of these concerns. They are also useless in bright light, and give unrealistic representation in dark conditions.
>>
>>4497911
>A video monitor/evf ... give[s] unrealistic representation in dark conditions.
This was such a big issue for me when I got my first mirrorless camera I had to keep reminding myself. Eventually I learned that going off the histo and light meter was a far better idea and got used to that, but it's just a non-issue with OVFs
>>
>>4497900
Absolutely based. Viewfinders are for unc millennials.
>>
>>4497902
Yeah and muhammad also fucked kids so who cares really?
>Viewfinders are more usable in bright light
I don't have this problem.
>easier to hold the camera steady for long exposures or tracking moving subjects.
Use a tripod then? Are you dumb? You think holding your camera like a widdle army man is gonna fix your issues? At best it's placebo.
>>4497905
Any respectable photographer doesn't care about these things. Keep throwing acronyms and technical jargon around and see if your photography improves (it won't).
>>4497907
Low tier bait.
>>
This whole thread is clearly bot posting
>>
tiltable EVFs are awesome.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.