/p/, I long for the 2000s. I miss the hangouts where someone always had a digital camera and was snapping away. I miss that sweet overexposed, sharpened, sometimes saturated look that naturally came from a digicam. Please post candid photos from the 2000s like picrel. The more unique the better.If you need help, go to Google Images and search (month) (year) and the word "flickr"ex - June 2005 flickr
>>4501799you might also be missing when people took photos with the idea only a few of there friends would ever see them so they are more just fun and unserious and as a result more real feeling.I dont think it is ever possible to get photos like this ever again as everybody knows anything can be posted online for millions to see so they dont act like this anymore in photos.
>>4501823
>>4501799anon i really think ur on to something
i couldnt find anything crazy too crazy tho. i gotta look more
>>4501823Wilton's place?
>>4501823Yes that's the idea. Everything was organic. Your friend brought his camera to the hangout or to the amusement park. Wherever. Snapped a few pics of us all being silly and our true selves. The pictures rarely made their way online and if they did it was weeks later when they hooked it up to their PC.I don't like all these retarded recreations by people under 25 trying to live secondhand nostalgia with their stupid filters. It completely misses the point. That specific digicam look was unique to the time period and is therefore associated with the purity of mankind.
>>4501799Jump on pbase and go to the pages for any digishit camera. Usually you can find galleries of pics like this.Search the camera on google followed by “pbase.” Much easier than using Pbase’s search system.
>>4501940>secondhand nostalgiaI think the zoomzooms feel like they don't have anything of their own, that there is nothing distinct about this era which is why they latch on to times past when trying to find an identity.
