>>4513848
you're gonna have to give us some context here
is this your image? if not, whose is it?
if it's yours, how'd you make it? what was your process?
if not, how'd the artist in question do it?
if there's more like it, please post more.

I think this is a reference to David Hockney dying. Pop artist and pioneer of Polaroid photography in art. RIP.
He experimented with photographic cubism. If /p/ had heroes, Hockney would be one of them.

>>4513851

Yup. I saw a big exhibition of his photographs when I was a teen and it blew my mind.

This is how a person actually sees things. We don't see a whole. We see tiny fragments. At first glance Hockney's pictures look almost normal, but the more you look...

Some people might look at this and think this guy lived his whole life without a wider lens. But, this is how they actually see things. They see tiny fragments.

>>4513853
>>4513854
>>4513855
Damn alright David I just thought you were making boring paintings I didn't know you had some real shit going on too. RIP

>>4513851
I have a hero and his name is eggleston

>>4513855
This is absolute kino