[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: wilshire manor.jpg (3.72 MB, 3456x2315)
3.72 MB JPG
itt: post your non-standard color photos. your lomo turquoise, your harman red, your aerochrome, and all the like. I guess if you do weird stuff with your digital sensors that's fine too.

shot a roll of kono donau II last weekend, its a blue monochromatic c-41 film rated at ISO 8.
>>
File: tower.jpg (3.02 MB, 2278x3432)
3.02 MB JPG
>>
File: urban light.jpg (3.72 MB, 2370x3547)
3.72 MB JPG
>>4515552
it has some non-blue pigment in it clearly. overexposed it pushes greenish and under it becomes almost purple. the negatives look weird too, its a clear plastic base but in the frame it's a characteristic yellow-orangey look
>>
File: urban night.jpg (3.94 MB, 2370x3564)
3.94 MB JPG
it makes for decent digital editing too since its super low ISO, very little grain. no idea how it'd print
>>
File: pay to park.jpg (3.85 MB, 3558x2370)
3.85 MB JPG
>>
File: tower 2.jpg (3.72 MB, 2370x3537)
3.72 MB JPG
>>
File: building gradient.jpg (3.63 MB, 3539x2370)
3.63 MB JPG
>>
File: blue corner.jpg (3.63 MB, 2370x3575)
3.63 MB JPG
>>
File: blue cross.jpg (3.66 MB, 2320x3454)
3.66 MB JPG
>>
File: dark blue rockface.jpg (4.16 MB, 3574x2370)
4.16 MB JPG
>>
File: abstract 1.jpg (3.57 MB, 3514x2334)
3.57 MB JPG
tried my hand at a bit of editing/cropping as well, I like how they turned out
>>
File: abstract 2.jpg (1.23 MB, 1355x1364)
1.23 MB JPG
>>4515562
I guess that one was actually just leveled and edited normally, these have much more slider movement
>>
File: abstract 3.jpg (1024 KB, 2503x2505)
1024 KB JPG
>>
File: abstract 4.jpg (3.32 MB, 2612x2588)
3.32 MB JPG
anyway pls respond and show me your funny color pics
>>
File: YellowPolaroids.jpg (65 KB, 645x822)
65 KB JPG
Ill post some random stuff I did. I had some yellow Polaroids at one point
>>
File: trichrometest1.jpg (301 KB, 842x559)
301 KB JPG
I also tried doing a trichrome effect. It was shot with my Ricoh GR3. I just took 3 b&w jpg's and they turned out with really weird colors.
>>
File: trichrometest3.jpg (246 KB, 844x557)
246 KB JPG
>>4515616
another
>>
>>4515615
a portrait
>>
File: layeredtest5.jpg (269 KB, 560x842)
269 KB JPG
>>4515617
Another one with a similar approach.
>>
File: 20250627_115109.jpg (4.54 MB, 3000x4000)
4.54 MB JPG
>>4515551
Ziatype. You coat the paper in a blend of different chemicals and it changes the color/contrast of the print. The process is somewhat similar to platinum palladium prints.
>>
>>4515615
its a lovely shade of piss

>>4515616
>>4515619
reminds me of the cover for -><- by collider

>>4515622
very cool effect and look, but I wish the brushwork were more intentional and the composition wasn't cut off.
>>
File: EggBottle.jpg (4.45 MB, 2122x2633)
4.45 MB JPG
>>4515662
Yeah agreed... It's the only image I could easily find that had some of the more dramatic color that ziatype can produce. You can get deep purple, blue, black, browns, and even split tones if you do it right. Very cool process and mich more accessible than plat/pd.
Here's another one. I have some of my dog as well, but I guess I'll stick with eggies for the time being. Most of the dog ones are pretty neutral toned anyways.

A fun fact ablut ziatype is that the images are incredibly stable. Platinum/palladium processes are estimated to last around or greater than 500 years!
>>
The ghost of the cow parts in the garbage are coming back to haunt you. Featuring: calf idol.
>>
>>4515622
>>4515670
I was looking at Kallitype as an affordable option. Do you have any experience or comments on it before I get in too deep? I just don't like the blue of a cyanotype and can't afford platinum
>>
>>4516183
None at all, but I would highly recommend getting into alt processes that you think look cool. They are a ton of fun.
Are you going to make your contact negatives with a printer?
>>
>>4516184
Thanks, wasn't expecting a response so quickly. I'm interested in prints with good dmax and closer to a traditional black/white print in terms of look, which is why I was looking at Kallitype. I would have to make negatives with a printer. I don't own an enlarger, so why contact prints appeal to me as an option for home printing. That and they look great. I don't have a huge space to set up an enlarger and darkroom wash station either. Just an apartment inside bathroom.
>>
>>4516187
Totally doable in a small bathroom. I do my conventional contact printing and enlargement prints in a 4x4 tent. It's cramped, but I make it work.

My advice is invest in a quality contact printing frame. You want a lot of pressure on your negative and paper or you will get soft images and highlight tonality will suffer. Good brushes are also very nice to have. I forget the name of them, but theres a brand everyone likes to use. Also silver nitrate stains EVERYTHING. I have beakers that I use to move silver nitrate and the outside of them that is completely dried and clean-ish looking will leave black stains on your fingers if you grab them. Stains on clothes are a permanent blackish purple. The stains last for about a week on your skin. Be aware since you're in a rental.

Printing digital negatives are really nice for contact printing alt processes because you have so much freedom to fine tune your contrast curve. You can get really attractive images without fussing with calibrating your exposure and development to get enough contrast and density in your film negstive to make a good looking print.
>>
>>4516191
Thanks for the info and tips anon. I'll be sure to look into a good frame and brushes. I appreciate the heads up about staining, too. If I make some prints one day, I'll be sure to post them.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.