All of these are just snapshots
>>4516030Make your own museum
>>4516030exactly snapshots are kino
>>4516030thats where you're wrong, bucko
Can someone please tell me what's the difference between snapshot and documentary photography?
>>4516042Documentary photography is based;Snapshots, cringe.
>justsnapshots can be great
>>4516030I think they hit different as prints
Occasionally a snapshit may appear as art, but it is rare.
>>4516050What makes a snapshot appear as art, you think?
>>4516051Nice light
>>4516061What makes light “nice?”
>>4516063You see it and go "nice"
>>4516064Gettin’ down to nuts and bolts today eh?
>>4516066If you see it you'll know exactly what I mean.
>>4516063You want that orange light that only exists one hour before sunset. If there isn't golden hour light don't even take a picture.
>>4516069Here is a good example. No point in taking pictures if the sun didn't just rise or it's about to set. Also digital cameras can't take pictures of the golden hour light. There is no point in shooting digital at all.
>>4516070anon, both these suck
>>4516070Its crazy how lighting turns this absolutely nothing photo into pure kino. >>4516073Retard doesn't understand photography. Photography is light. Best light is golden hour. One day you will learn.
>>4516070You can use other light to good effect as well, but you gotta snap the right shot for it to work.
>>4516076What I'm saying is that if you took a photo or a dope subject. Like 10/10 composition. The best light you could light it with would be 10/10 orange golden hour light. Anything else is like a 9 or 7 or even 8 or something.
>>4516077Are you fucking retarded?
>>4516077Wickedly boomer take, bro.
>>4516077Based
>>4516051Coincidence and luck.
>>4516042Documentary photography is of something worth documenting.
>>4516089How does one discern what is documentary-worthy?
>>4516096I don't think it can be measured objectively, especially when splitting hairs. But you can say for certain on the far ends that somethings are and aren't. >9/11Worth taking a photos>The line at subwayNot worth taking a photo of
>>4516030> Art thing is "just" thingAnd?Are not able to formulate 1 relevant critique about his work?
>>4516064Only relevant post in the thread
Eggleston shore etc are grifts, not artists. Any value is limited to art student in jokes.
>>4516030They are snapshits and they are not and have never been art. He came from wealth and knew people. He was a loser gay boy and this was the only way his dad could ensure he wouldn’t be a failure. That’s it.
>>4516030Snapshots gain value as time progresses.
>>4516030I like the jacket and the dude standing by the polethe others are meh
>>4516070>digital cameras can't take pictures of the golden hour lightlmao
>>4516176he's right though
>>4516177>>4516070Shut up stupid.
>>4516179this is a pleasing image
>>4516030It truly is about who you know and not what you know.
>>4516179not a bad photo but the point still stands.
>>4516179I wanna set it as my wallpaper do you have higher res of that ing?
>>4516075So what? I should take photos only when sun is super angled?
>>4516030>/p/osers defending this shityeah of course
>>4516042Early life section
>>4516064There's no reason photography has to be more complicated than this.
>>4516242>There's no reason photography has to be more complicated than thisThere's a reason, that is if you want to make good photography often
>>4516255That's just deliberate recalibration of what light makes you say "nice."
>>4516260Composition/geometry isn't purely light but i do agree they are moving the camera around until you say "nice"
>>4516176>>4516179I beg to differ.
>>4516176>>4516179>>4516262
>>4516263>>4516262>fool's golden hour
>>4516263>>4516262Amateur. Upload the raw and I’ll show you how it’s done.
>>4516077What if you don't want the photo to be orange?
>>4516289Too bad.
>>4516263t. rawtherapee or some other dog shit editor
>>4516282Just so you can make it look like the slide? I'll have to think about that.
>>4516292its crazy how every darktable/rawtherapee user can take pics with any camera and make it look like a lumix m43
>>4516219<--->>4516263>>4516262>Babby's first /p/hotographNigga these would have got absolutely eviscerated in old /p/
>>4516328/p/ is dead shoogar. Not even sure why the board hasn't be repurposed to /p/irate yet.
>>4516330Dead? Debateable. I think a lot of what used to be here was bots and board tourists. I do miss people like d and 5h0e who were always dropping knowledge. No one really does that anymore.
>>4516336fe2fucker getting booted was the final straw for me unfortunately. Anyone who actually wants to do something with the hobby gets pushed out.Only reason you stick around is stubborness, I'm guessing. At least you post shit instead of what seems to be endless gearfag wars or brand shilling. Hell, I don't post any more just because the only responses end up being "I can tell this is a Nikon" etc.Anyway, old /p/ had higher standards. I'm not actually sure that was a good or bad thing, but the userbase is so small now that any feedback is welcomed at all.
>>4516340fe2 knew too much and said things he wasn’t allowed to talk about, because they don’t exist and were russian disinfomove along citizen
>>4516336>No one really does that anymore.Days ago i posted what i consider the best lenses for Nikon F and i don't think anyone read it>>4516340>userbase is so small now that any feedback is welcomed at allWe are at year 2006 or alt-imageboard levels, you now know what it feels like but to be fair old forums that had decent activity also died down, the Bentacks forums, Manual Focus Lenses, even mid-life dentist crisis forums like FredMiranda.After the plandemic it all tumbled down.
>>4516282>>4516298I want to see the RAW too
>>4516362>>4516282The TIFFs are missing from that roll, but you get the full JPG and NEF.https://www.filemail.com/d/fcubnwmlypcggqo
>>4516437
>>4516443PROOF digital is superior and looks like real life! Film subscriptiontographers btfo!
