[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: cover7-2017556980.jpg (266 KB, 1920x1080)
266 KB JPG
>Go to Japan
>Only shoot Kodak Portra 400
>>
yeah so?
portra is a film for the digital age, just make it look how you want in post
>>
>Go to Japan

This is the first mistake
>>
>>4516992
Portrait film is real color film. Consumer stuff was terrible. It'd turn brown hair black, pull blues to cyan, reds to magenta, etc... it was designed to look super-saturated. I hated it. I have a pack of Fuji Xtra 400 sitting in the freezer, I'm gonna toss it when I move.
>>
>>4516992
I wouldn't do it, but people should shoot whatever they want
>>
>>4516992
Only if I can push it to 800
>>
>>4517057
nta but what do you think of ektar?
I’ve taken a liking to it recently but that’s also partly because the negatives don’t curl and are super easy to handle (do my own dev & scans)
>>
>>4516992
>Not picking up a roll of Pro Image 100 from a local mom-and-pop store
>>
>>4517070
whities do be looking red with ektar though
>>
if i went to meme slanty eye anime world i'd probably shoot vision3
>>
>>4516992
this buy fuji superia premium for those vivid magentas! wow!!
>>
File: MINT PLUS PLUS PLUS.png (468 KB, 903x699)
468 KB PNG
>>4516992
>Go to Japan
>Everything is MINT
>>
>>4517138
Lol i saw this listing. I cant fucking believe how much 1N's have gone up. Some fuckhead 'tuber must have made a video about how they're lowkey slept on & ngl straight fire
>>
>>4517138
>>4517139
their whole rating system is fucked I don't know why they bother
like
>Excellent+++
>Pre-owned, minimal signs of use
>Appearance is beautiful, tiny scuffs from normal use.
>Optics: Very good condition.
>There is heavy fog due to balsam separation.
>There is no fungus.
>There is no scratches.
>There is coating deterioration on the rear element.
bruh this thing is so fucked I don't know how you can tell whether there is fungus & scratches or not
https://www.ebay.com/itm/366534378206
>>
>>4517232
>their whole rating system is fucked I don't know why they bother
Yeah I mean its just not a standardised system, its like tuning 'stages' on a car. Every shop has different definitions of what each category means so its pointless.

>https://www.ebay.com/itm/366534378206
Well thats more haze than lens
>>
>>4517232
i actually dont know what the japanese do to abuse their lenses so badly

so many of the cheap lenses there have haze or fungus...is it the tropical weather + improper storage and smoker households?
>>
File: s-l1600-1.jpg (199 KB, 1600x1067)
199 KB JPG
>>4517301
>tropical weather + improper storage
it's gotta be that
the GX680 system has this flocking on the back surface of the lenses, like a velvety foam material
99% of the GX680 lenses from japan, the flocking is fucked — shrunken, cracked, and/or somehow shiny
it's so bad I've just come to accept it, it's not like it would be super hard to re-flock them
but then on the other hand, >50% of the listings NOT from japan, the flocking is fine
remember these lenses were last produced like 20 years ago
>>
File: portra400102019020.jpg (1.85 MB, 3740x2139)
1.85 MB JPG
sue me then
>>
>>
File: portra80010112019018.jpg (1.85 MB, 4031x2633)
1.85 MB JPG
>>
>>
File: kodakgold800112019036.jpg (2.85 MB, 3689x2236)
2.85 MB JPG
kodak gold is good too
>>
File: kodakgold400112019013.jpg (4.98 MB, 2417x3882)
4.98 MB JPG
>>
File: kodakgold400112019035.jpg (3.98 MB, 3891x2380)
3.98 MB JPG
>>
>>4516992
>Only shoot Kodak Portra 400
yeah should have shot Ektacolor 400 instead
>>
File: 81BKL1xvFWL.jpg (318 KB, 2409x1269)
318 KB JPG
At least shoot glorious Nippon slide film

>poor dynamic range
skill issue

>expensive
>can afford to fly and stay at hotels
>>
>>4517315
i'll see you in court.
>>
>>4517315
>>4517316
>>4517317
>>4517318
>>4517319
>>4517320
>>4517321
we get it, you hate color and properly focused sujects
>>
>>4517411
Doesn't look like missed focus to me, just looks like either bad scans or a mid lens on the camera.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.