groundskeepers and hikers unite!post your most grandiose landscapes
>>4518590Wow
>>4518590nice shot anon, very nice
>>4518497Is this Velvia?
>>4518693Nikon d610 with a 50mm I flattened the image and then used tone curves to bring out what I wanted in lrc instead of the usual sliders
>>4518711could you post the default jpg/whatever raw converter you used output? I'm curious to see the difference because I would have the sky be much brighter although it's going to look less saturated.
>>4518712You think it’s a little rockwellian? Valid. The version I had printed maintained the bit of hazy white clouds around the mountain tops there but when resizing for /p/ I figured I’d play around with tone curves. I notice a lot of “professional” photographers use masks and tone curves like crazy and color grade all photos to create specific instagram themes. It’s a neat concept that I have been trying to learn so don’t judge the edit I posted too harshly. I’ll post the original this afternoon. As a side note I also bracketed for the photo and created a blend because this was taken outside of golden hour. In order to get the sky blue without the highlights completely blown a second image was taken 2 down so there’s no single “default”
>>4518712
>>4518807thanks, I prefer the sooc for this one desu but messing with curves is an important activity for post processing
>>4518525>>4518590beautiful>>4518943could be way off but is this in davenport, ca?
>>4519158BingoWonderful shot of Tahoe
>>4518590Holy smokes what a photo
>>4518590Nice photo, but the masking on the rocks is terrible. They glow and light looks weird.
>>4518807This looks so much better. Excellent example of how editing can ruin a perfectly good picture. Please never use Photoshop again.
>>4520291You have a photo you would like to contribute with?
*chirp*
Why would anyone post their landscapes here when there's a /rpt/?
Ugh! So THIS is why the site is dying...
>>4521679This is a phone photo isnt it?
>>4522503beautiful, thanks for sharing. Where is this?
>>4521658pretty nice but i want to see more of that heart on the right
>>4522522Torres Del Paine in Patagonian Chile
>>4522633any more photos from there? that landscape looks kino
>>4522734Yeah, I’ll see what I got when I get home from work
>>4522788
>>4522791
>>4522792
>>4522793
>>4522794
>>4522795
>>4522792Very pretty set brother
>>4522822Thanks!
>>4522836
a seascape landscape from Kassandra, a peninsula in Greece
>>4522882
>>4522883Oops, forgot image
>>4522885Maybe not
>>4522886
>>4522889
>>4522894
>>4523179
>>4522890Where’s that at?
>>4523736An island off ao neng, Thailand
Feel slightly uncomfortable about posting this, but please critique. I'm still relatively new to photography, and I know almost nothing about landscape stylistically. Tried to get kinda cute here with the composition, but I don't know if it really works. This is Mount Lassen shot from just under the summit of the nearby Cinder Cone that I nearly died (of exhaustion) climbing. I wish Cinder Cone's grade was slightly more symmetrical with the trees', but I still like the idea.>>4522788This feels really cinematic. I love the foreground, and the rocks in the distance look awesome. Where is that?>>4523181Holy shit, I love that. What aperture setting was this taken with? I love how much detail you have in the clouds despite the depth of field very clearly separating the foreground and background.
>>4523775Thanks for the compliments. First pic is low tide at ao neng Thailand, Second pic, Andes foothills along the way to MP f/8. Wish I had some tip or critiques for you, but I’m a noob too. Nice pic tho, I appreciate the foreground consideration
im shy lol
>>4523740Oh cool! Ao Nang was awesome when I went, sadly didn’t get to stay that long. Should have spent all my time there instead of Phuket.
My best landscape pano to date.
>>4523775Not great content and composition-wise The blurry rocks in the foreground are just an ugly distraction from the mountain. There are no interesting elements that "point" or lead your eye towards the mountain in the background. It just feels bland and boring overall. The cloudless sky doesn't add any interest either.Aside from the blurry foreground rocks it is a well executed shot on the technical side, so there is that at least. Scout locations with good fore, mid, and background then wait for the weather to be bad enough so there are cool clouds and then catch some interesting light. Excellent landscape photography usually requires a lot of time scouting the perfect spot, patience to wait until ideal weather, and commitment to planning and executing that plan when all the elements align for that one perfect shot, or just hike a lot and hope you get lucky. :D
>>4523775I like it, but there's a big mound of rocks and stones blocking about a quarter of the photo.
will post a few of mine, they're all years old since I haven't had time for photos lately
>>4524990
>>4524991
>>4524992
>>4524994
>>4524995
>>4524996
>>4524997
>>4524998
>>4524999thoughts on this one? I think it's kind of cool but I'm not sure if the lighting looks too fake
>>4525000
>>4525001last pic. took this during a bicycle ride at like 4:30 in the night/morning, it was in june so the sun was just coming up
>>4522503nice stuff>>4522882extremely cool colors, it really looks like that without editing? I haven't seen such a landscape before>>4522896excellent foreground choice>>4523928good composition, but I think it needs different editing, I feel it should be brighter and more colorful>>4524816this is indeed good, would probably have been even better if you were more lucky with the clouds
>>4525005Doing the lords work, thanks for the critiques. Yes they look that way
>>4525002>>4525001>>4525000Which phone? Xiaomi?
Looks like Switzerland
>>4525101Cool
>>4522889>>4525101God i love winter scenes at golden hour
>>4525292is this mars
>>4525397film doesn't work on mars because the silver in the film needs oxygen to oxidize
>>4518497
Apologies if this is more suitable for /gear/ but what are the pros and cons of different full frame systems for landscapes and is there a recommended "gold standard"? I'm mostly looking for more megapickles and better dynamic range, a lower minimum ISO and better low-light performance than the hard-working K-70 I currently own. Digital MF seems great but I don't do photography for a living and don't have a trust fund.And to keep things more on topic I'd appreciate any feedback on this older photo. The crop works pretty well IMO but it was also something of a necessity because I had some crap on my filter and didn't realize it until later. Oh well.
