[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1763329131444616.jpg (99 KB, 800x600)
99 KB JPG
I have never ever regretted buying a camera this much this quickly

Over processed piece of shit, exposure is all over the place, the colors are all phone tier artificial overdone shit, panning is jittery, it's all shit
>>
>>4519454
we know you never buyed it
>>
>>4519454
examples? From what I've seen it looks fine and those kinds of cameras can fit a niche that is hard for others to do.
>>
>>4519460
Retard
>>4519461
Well I only shot private things I don't wanna share. Just think of the worst Samsung smartphone camera overprocessing with artificial colors that aren't accurate, but eh exposure is mostly way overexposed and sometimes way underexposed.

And if you don't believe me, just order it, see for yourself and return it
>>
>>4519463
Can you shoot an example of a non private thing? There's probably some color setting in there to turn down the crazy smartphone look. Dial the sharpness down, maybe there's a "natural" color profile. Really surprised a gimbal phone would have jittery panning. Could be a lemon? I'd return it. I haven't looked that closely at it, just saw the usual flood of early influencer vids and watched one. It looked fine but glad to know it might be garbage.
And no, I am not going to buy one just to see but given that most of the people who have reviewed this are shills, if you did a negative review online somewhere, that could save people a lot of money.
>>
>>4519521
I already returned it
>>
You never owned one, did you?
>>
File: screenshot.png (159 KB, 1149x1400)
159 KB PNG
>>4519605
Are you brain dead? What would be the point, you stupid retard?
>>
>>4519605
he bought it to film porn
>>
>>4519454
>co engineered with LEICA

the mark of death
>>
>>4519657
TRVKE
>>
File: luna360.jpg (286 KB, 2762x1522)
286 KB JPG
actually it beats full frame chud
>>
>>4519696
>f/4 ISO 25600
Brother my cannot pos r can see in the dark with those settings. Pick a better comparison camera if the snoy can't deal with it.

Also
>1" Sensor
>"PureVideo" Mode
So it's a software cheat then? And not a true representation of the organic sensor capabilities?
It's never a fair battle with you sensorlets baka.
>>
File: 25600.jpg (434 KB, 1633x1678)
434 KB JPG
>>4519732
>my cannot pos r can see in the dark with those settings
I don't think so, chud



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.