Okay it's been a while since we've had these so...Let's start by posting the guy I visualize when I see a streetfag here on /p/. I'll post his work below, he really encompasses the creepy streetfag vibe. He's not unlike the freaks immortalized in Dario Argento's and Brian De Palma's classic gialli. His work is the validation of Susan Sontag's perception of photography as a form of rape.His name is not unlike that of the psychos in the horror thriller canon. Smooth Leg Greg, not unlike Buffalo Bill, Dale Longlegs, or Leatherface.Am I wrong in my perception? Anyways, street photography thread.
>>4519877One more picture of the photographer, truly encapsulates the feel of Lamberto Bava's La casa con la scala nel buio.
I mean his voyeuristic work does. Street at its finest, predatory photography.
>>4519880I believe the streetfag term for it is "confrontational photography".
>>4519877susan sontag was an unintelligent schizophrenic retard (no better than a 4chan philosopher) and this guy’s just an asshole who takes funny photos
>>4519882Sure, "funny photos". This has the same feel as Lamberto Bava's stalker in La casa con la scala nel buio.
>>4519884Sontag might have been a neurotic kike but she got it down to a T when it comes to streetfags
>>4519877>>4519884smooth legs Greg is more of a photographer than you'll ever be, cinefag. turn the trip back on, we all fucking know it's you with your letterboxdcore movie references. post your photography while you're at it. it's probably all missed focus pics of telephone poles, your 70s sunglasses collection and "artful" closeups of tree bark
Streetfags, this is your idea of art.
>>4519886>y-you are l-le cinefag!!!!Suppose I am, how does that make street creeping acceptable?
Last one, I've made my point
>>4519888got your confession, /fa/ggotron. not a surprise that you (cinefag) use the gayest board on the site next to /lgbt/ lmaodid your dog get monkeypox yet?
>>4519886Here's an utility pole I took, fag
>>4519891I went there to laugh at moop, also I don't have a dog. Faggot.I bet the streetfags on this board are prolific /fa/ users though
>>4519892you really don't want to start a pole measuring contest you can't win lmao
>>4519894Mine was ironic, I don't think yours is. Also AI isn't photography.
>>4519895the grain structure proves it's real. the american candy colors on your snapshit indicates that you train AI on Ken Rockwell photos lol
>>4519896Mine predates generative AI and I posted here long ago dipshit, you don't get to "no u" out of this quagmire
>>4519898well it looks like both of ours are real, but yours is fake in sentiment. posted utterly dishonestly and snapped carelessly from a phone. you can't make art from a fucking telephone
>>4519898bro literally copy-pasting his mid-ass letterboxd reviews onto an imageboard because his dopamine receptors are completely fried. bro has been spamming the exact same tier-1 Argento and Sontag NPC dialogue trees since 2014. absolute room-temp IQ film major behavior. go outside and touch a telephoto lens, bro's agoraphobia is off the charts.imagine sitting in total darkness typing out a whole 10-page video essay thesis on a cantonese milk carton board just because a candid street photo triggered your deepest fears. you've written more paragraphs about smooth leg greg than greg has taken frames this entire decade. post your gear or shut the absolute fuck up, holy shit. go watch french New Wave garbage and cry into your onions latte. touch grass.
>>4519900double dubs confirm holy shit lmaocinefag will never ever recover from this BTFOing
>>4519900You type like the kind of brainded fucktard who drooled over Emma Watson
>>4519900I shouldn't but I keep coming back to this shitty post, I'm not a French New Wave apologist and it's disgraceful that you'd imply such a thing... bastard
>>4519889Well the difference between modern street like you’re showing and classic street photography was the backing behind itMoMa, fashion industries, Guggenheim,film industry all backed famous street photographers and gave it legitimacy Whereas what you are criticizing is how anyone can take a photo in the streetAnd just because that’s what the greats once did doesn’t make it good or morally right Or to your eyes aesthetically pleasing Obviously there’s good street photos and bad onesIf you cherry pick you make yourself look like a retard which is what you have successfully done with this threadYou’re comparable to that guy you’re critiquing
A cinefag thread?The guy who had a crashout arguing that bestiality was okay if the dog fucked him and made cANON freak the fuck out because he had a dog, and had pretended to be cinefag as a joke?
>>4519920>the greatslol, lmao evenStreet photography isn't art, not even "good" street photography is.>>4519928Nice headcanon
>>4519929Read at your own riskhttps://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4220006/#4221517He defended this, had a boardwide meltdown and now his name and trip are automatic bansk3k.
>>4519930Lying bitch, thanks for posting the rebuttal. As you can see I was calling out the bullshit claims that white women fuck dogs. Also no, I didn't trip because I didn't want to. Fag.
>>4519932Pick a bridge and fall with style, zoophilehttps://archive.palanq.win/p/thread/4442111/#4452494
>>4519933>if you counter the zoophilia libel waged against white women you're the zoophilefunny how that works
>>4519936Yes you are a zoophile
>the guy who made a thread about a weird exhibitionist trannies 30 subscriber AGP vlog (how did he know it existed?) is also a dogfuckerKek. Smooth legs greg is not a photographer. Its a fetish channel. I googled it.
>>4519938>Why yes, I can't read, how could you tell?
>>4519939>a fetish channelHe's a /fa/ tripfag and he posts street photography he does, whether he considers himself a photographer or not is irrelevant. The output is the same as streetfags here. If anything, the fag's more honest by not pretending it's art.
lame threadperverts here will go to unhinged lengths to avoid doing or posting photography. literally no one cares that you hate street photography bud
>>4519940>no im not a zoophile i just said more people should have sex with dogs anf its morally ok to do so because uhhh the jews>>4519941>he’s not a photographer>he’s a tranny that posts videos of people sneering at himThat’s really it
>>4519877>>4519894desu, better than the am i talented? spammer fag.
>>4519987But he's not a tranny. In fact, /fa/ trannies like MWAHnon have expressed disgust at the fact that he's a "cis gay". He's a wannabe androgynous faggot.
>>4519938He's worse than a zoophile, even the French directors he lives so much say cinephilia is a disease and a perversion.
>>4520008I assume you meant "he likes so much" and no, other than Chris Marker I'm not a big fan of the French. I much prefer Italians.
>>4519977He literally posted photography though. CDS is getting out of hand, he posts and people lose their grip on reality.
