>on the hunt for an ff lens equivalent of xf 18mm 1.4>canon charges 3k, lets try nikon>good lenses, crap bodies. lets try soney>bodies look promising.mp4>viltrox or sony 20mm... kind of>viltrox 26 2.8 is the closest. >2.8>ffguess i dont need a fucking camera
>>4524354Go for the Voigtlander 28mm f2 APOReal talk though, out of the 17 XF lenses I've owned, there are 3 I think are truly on par with pro tier FF glass when it comes to optical quality, and the 18 f1.4 is definitely one of them.
>>4524354>2.8>ffwell well wel 1.4 x 1.5 = 2.1 so don't get too snobby, sensorlet
>>4524373yeah, just shoot the Z 24mm 1.8s and crop down to 28mm. you get absolutely superb image quality and it wont cost more than $800 or so28mm is a joke focal length though just get on and get the Z 35mm f1.2s
>>4524354Sigma 28mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens (Sony E) ?
>>4524354Viltrox AF 28mm f/1.8 Lens (Sony E)
>>4524354Sony FE 28mm f/2 Lens
Thypoch 28mm f1.4>hunt for an ff lens equivalent of xf 18mm>bodies bodies bodiesDo you want a lens or a system you dumb freak
>>4524709I don't think anon knows either.
