>he takes pics landscape
>>4525222i do not care for the opinions of people who look like they play golf
I dun geddit
>>4525225Zoomies are too lazy to turn their phones so they want even a picture of 4 guys standing next to each in front of a vista they spent a ton of money to get a photo in front of to be shot in portrait.You're welcome.
>>4525284>he thinks it's about lazinesstime for your nap gramps
>>4525297>NOOO ITS BECAUSE IT FITS BETTER WHEN I DOOMSCROLL AND I DONT HAVE TIME TO TURN MY PHONE BECAUSE THEN ID HAVE TO WAIT .1S TO SCROLL TO THE NEXT VERTICAL VIDEO NOOOO>TAKING PHOTOS TO ENJOY THEM INDIVIDUALLY IS LE OLD FASHIONED AND ADHD IS IN!You’re not hip. You’re hampered. Literally brain damaged. Tech billionaires, political elites, and hasidic jews don’t let their kids use smartphones, fyi. Let that sink in.
>>4525225It's because zoomers have to take photos in aspect ratios that are good for scrolling and posting on social media, which means it has to be vertical. Shit like TikTok and Instagram just aren't made to have anything that's wide and will just auto crop it to look vertical.
>>4525222>he shoots film and then scans the negatives>he shoots film and uses a lab>he shoots snoy>he shoots fool framemental illness
>>4525358I do all those and nobody here can tell kek. Literally makes no difference.
>>4525358What about slide film?
>>4525362slide is for snoy people, horrible colors.
>>4525358Pretentiousness+a photo that shit+being such a gearfaggot you’re trying to bring back exif=all of your opinions are wrongSony’s marketing department will be compensating you shortly. You really made buying a FF snoy sound like a good move there.
>using any lens with >5 elements at allI physically cringe
>>4525297You won't say what it's "actually" about because there is no answer, you stupid kid.
>>4525364You're fuming lmao, he did well just for that reason. Getting rid of all EXIF was done not to spite gearfags but to protect incompetent fujislugs who shoot nearly still subjects at like 1/22000s and sky high ISO
>>4525389>Getting rid of all EXIF was done not to spite gearfags but to protect incompetent fujislugsIt made this place better since photos are now judged on how they look and not what camera was used. It's a based change.
>>4525396>Inb4 guys check out this sick photo I took with my full frame niggon!>PSYCHE. It's actually a lolympus >Lmao no-one can actually tell the difference
>>4525398Yes.
>>4525396it's only a based change if you're a worm faggot and get bullied everywhere for spending money on overpriced toys
>>4525407You'll never know though evidently kek.
>>4525358>Yeah bro the white border just makes it look and neat *slaps branded technical slop text contiguous with the image on the entire frame's length*
>>4525358dangerously based
>>4525223Advice for life
>>4525407Nah you're just a shit photographer.
>>4525358>He takes a perfectly functional digital camera and tries his best to make the photos look like they are b&w film shots
>>4525396They could have just left the settings and not show camera brand or model
