[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 404_page_image.jpg (59 KB, 468x754)
59 KB JPG
Oops! Edition

Please post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.

Also talk about darkroom practices, enlargers, photo paper, techniques like dodging/burning, tools, and equipment related to enlarging, developing, and printing.

Thread Question: Did you pick up film as a hobby after shooting digital? Or did you just never stop shooting film? And do you do both simultaneously now (phone snapshits don't count)?

Previous thread: >>4520917
>>
>>4526501
I guess you could still harvest the silver from them, but the fixer may be more expensive than the silver you get. Apparently 1 8x10 sheet has .08 grams of silver.
>>
>>4526504
So 8 grams from a 100-pack of 8x10, assuming no losses. That's $17.20 at today's price. Not sure how you would even sell it, but I doubt that's breaking even considering all the other consumables, water and energy besides just fixer.
I have almost 4 gallons of saturated fixer sitting in the garage, I really should get on with that project of harvesting the silver from it, but I'm too lazy (and too cheap, mainly to buy a crucible and torch just for a silly hobby project).
>>
>>4526505
Maybe with a cheap homebrewed thiosulfate based developer you could make a few bucks.
>4 gallons of fixer
Same. Put some steel wool in it now and the silver drops out. You strain out the silver powder and melt it into a bar. Pawn shops and some jewelry stores will pay you for it.
It would be really cool if you made a little shutter button or some camera accessory/charm out of the silver you recovered from fixing film/paper also.
>>
Anyone buy film on Amazon? Or is it a mix of fake shit?
>>
>>4526514
Film is absurdly overpriced on amazon. Go to a local B&M store instead.
>>
I already have a Maxxum 7000 AF and a bunch of lenses. Is it worth stepping up to this 9000 AF with the MD90 Motor Winder? I really only shoot film on vacations/trips.
>>
File: IMG_2271.jpg (342 KB, 1280x855)
342 KB JPG
>>
>>4526534
most Kodak consumer films are available for prices similar to my local sellers
>>
>>4526629
Gold 120 5 pack 58, portra 5 pack 68. I guess it aint so bad really.
>>
>>4526582
The 9000's a nice camera but beware they are notorious for their aperture mechanism failing
>>
>>4526514
I don't think fake film exists, at least not in the way that most fake stuff do. At worst you'll get something short-dated that was potentially improperly stored. But then how many brick and mortar stores, even photography focused, do store their film refrigerated?
The few times I did buy from Amazon (because I absolutely needed some next day and B&H and others would take too long) it was just fine for immediate use.
Make sure to check who the actual seller is, and if it's not Amazon then have a look at their ratings and reviews just in case.
>>4526534
It was about 15-25% more than what I would pay if I could wait a few days. Annoying, but I wouldn't say absurdly so.
>>
>>4526695
>I don't think fake film exists, at least not in the way that most fake stuff do.
I've seen some weird complaints in reviews about the film being seemingly glued inside the canisters or other odd shit like that. I even saw one where the film was open, used and had someone else's photos on it (I don't even know how the fuck that can happen)
>>
>>4526830
Id mainly be worried about getting expired and poorly stored film from scamazon.
>>
>>4526834
I have a few rolls I'm sending off soon, so I guess I'll see how they turn out. I haven't bought any expired ones so far but the worst I've seen was a box that was expiring in only two months, while some others have almost a full year on them.
>>
File: IMG_0139.jpg (657 KB, 1880x1281)
657 KB JPG
>>4526168
gives me hope for my two rolls of unknown vintage
>>
File: Bigbitch.jpg (861 KB, 1053x1440)
861 KB JPG
Should I get the massive 8x10 enlarger with dichroic head? The guy said he would deliver it for free. 3.5k. The thing weighs over 500lbs.
>>
>>4526923
Over 8 feet tall.

>>4526877
I really loved the nps colors and feel like I need to get more rolls.
I hope your rolls work out well and you share some of the pics.
>>
File: gold029 (1).jpg (3.27 MB, 1295x1733)
3.27 MB JPG
Dog.
>>
File: Portra34.jpg (3.56 MB, 2011x1534)
3.56 MB JPG
Cows.
>>
>>4526656
Yeah I don't need it then, thanks.
>>
File: Portra38.jpg (3.37 MB, 1423x1885)
3.37 MB JPG
Two Cow
>>
File: Portra35.jpg (4.11 MB, 2177x1622)
4.11 MB JPG
Calf
>>
File: Portra32.jpg (3.55 MB, 1473x1977)
3.55 MB JPG
Bull.
This guy just started letting me give him head scratches after having him for multiple years. Had to get a few nice portraits of him in celebration.

That is all for now. Thank you.
>>
>>4527017
>>4527019
>>4527020
>>4527021
Mood
>>
File: 2026_0040_016.jpg (298 KB, 1500x1000)
298 KB JPG
Kot.
>>
File: Tri-X 3-10.jpg (1.41 MB, 2075x3130)
1.41 MB JPG
>>
Anyone ever attenpt RA4 reversal process? Tricky ass process. So many variables to understand when first starting.

>>4527022
Cannot wait for the grass to come back. Too somber without all the GREEN.
>>
File: 200 100 comparison.jpg (320 KB, 1497x1000)
320 KB JPG
First roll of fomapan 200 came out looking a bit thin at recommended parameters (6 min in fomadon LQN 1+10), edge markings included. Developer itself was fine, the roll of fomapan 100 I processed right before came out normal.
That's gonna be dense enough for scanning, but would that be too thin for good darkroom prints? I plan on getting into it eventually.
>>
Im a fool and left my unshot portra 160 film in my carry on luggage and it went through the scan because i was rushing

Will the carry on scanners ruin my rolls? Anyone had this happen to them?
>>
>>4527149
Carry on is fine. Checked luggage is probably fucked too an extent, but at least it's only 160.
I've had a couple of (shot) ProZ 800 rolls fucked in corner luggage. They were still mostly salvageable, just annoying to do so.
Since it's unshot then just use it for less important stuff. Or cut the loss and toss it if you can't afford the risk.
>>
>>4527128
Just looking at density and contrast it seems like they'll print fine. You may be fighting with contrast/ sufficient shadow detail on the top frames a bit, but it doesn't look extreme.
>>
>>4527149
That's pretty slow. It's probably fine. I would worry if it was 400+.
>>
File: Photos_cj5F4xUUza.png (588 KB, 678x829)
588 KB PNG
>>
>>4527158
Dont worry it’s just for my honeymoon in Greece

Good thing I brought digital too kek
>>
File: 000010370013.jpg (2.53 MB, 1818x1206)
2.53 MB JPG
>under/overexposure by a few stops usually throws off the white balance
>but white balancing off the frame lines and edges, which are unexposed and equivalent to -infinity stops, is completely fine
explain this
>>
>>4527208
>white balancing off the film base works
yeah
>>
>>4527208
everything is exposed relative to the film base
>>
>>4526695
I just saw a reel on instagram where a lady wedding photographer got a 5 pack of portra 35 off amazon and ended up with rocks inside the plastic film containers. LOL



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.