New motto - gear only matters if your photo doesn't suck.
>>4528802you got it backwards!
>>4528802>newfag retard can't even link previous threadAll gearfags are retarded, huh?
>>4528855Checked. I can't say care in this case, though — they're little more than containment threads at this point.
>>>/p/gearThere are literally ten of thesePick one and post there instead>>4528856The few posters that need contained like anti-sony spammer and his mandatory archive stalker don't contain themselves to gear threads anywaysWe need someone supremely autistic and hostile to be appointed /p/ hotpocket
>>4528858That would be wonderful and long overdue, though the cynical part of me thinks that the position would only attract the exact dickhead who would make things worse and kill this slow board for good. Trying to self-regulate without proper mod and admin support only seems to encourage the troublemakers to approach things differently.
>>4528858That is the same person though. but it is best to have his fursonas clash in here then shitting up the board more. At least the photo threads are mostly safe since they are about posting photos
>>4528863I think visible poster IDs would benefit the board, at least it would expose the samefagging.
>>4528864That reminds me - I'm glad that I've never fallen for the bait where someone suddenly demands for you to post photos over an unrelated argument. I've never seen such demands being made in good faith.
>>4528864Actually if one of the furries was a mod it would actually be good because they both shill vintage DSLRs and would giggle and hand flap if they banned everyone talking about post-2013 digital cameras
>>4528869Ironic shitposting is still shitposting, and it needs to be handled by someone who's stable enough to be unbiased.
>>4528868Same
>>4528868>I claim to be an expert, and then when people call me out I dont take the bait. PROVE i'm not pulling shit out of my ass? lmao. i'm glad to be a nophoto fake expert.>>4528878case in point your friend in this is a literal iranny tranny neo-nazi
I know this sounds quaint, but what if we tried getting into the practice of actively ignoring shitposters and reporting their posts instead? We have one here that we can try that with now — what's the worst that could happen?
>>4528802/r/ing the screencap where either Burt or Bass shooped this on /p/ and travel sites for African safaris were spamming it kekI may actually have it somewhere I'll look today on my file server
Why are all these gear thread just copy pastas and spergin.No actual discussion about gear.uw lenses what to look for what to avoid and whyflash. What to look for what to avoidMacro lenses, tripods, macro lenses, macro rails, star trackers, filters, zoom lenses, batteries, power banks, memory cards, cages, all sorts of gearSame thead over and over againDp review same picture taken with a6700 over and over againSame plinkines video, same lrc speed up editig, same m43 equivalence. There are so many things to talk about and you anus tonguers post the same shit every gear head.Just poat news ffrom your ayatem of new lenses, cameras or whatever. It will bring more info than the curent discussion. Some chinese launched some wierd or interesting lens. Post and talk about it. Weird cameras. Weird lenses. Weird filters.
>>4528908I got your back bro
>>4528908
>>4528911There are a few anons here who are on a crusade to convince people to never, ever, ever buy a sony or a fujifilm camera and that the only real options for a compact are micro four thirds and the lumix S9. They repost the same intellectually dishonest, often flat out made up shit down to the images and the filenames over and over again until someone agrees with them, so, endlessly.They're either paid shills or NPCs that migrated from /g/, /v/, /pol/ etc. None of them are distinct from each other or act like honest human beings, and it's entirely feasible things you'd assume were one person are actually dmany ifferent indians working in shifts.
>>4528913>>4528914That's funny shit. I wonder if we could ever do something like that again.
>>4528921There are few people and this board. All have cameras already. Some have sony. Some have fuji. Trying to convince who? There are some anons asking for what to buy as their first camera but i belive most of them are some of these retards waiting for someboddy to post any camera recommendation just to have a flame war.
>>4528924You're talking to one of the flame-baiters right now. He will try to drag your conversation into one, no matter how you respond. The best thing we can do is starve them of this satisfaction and keep reporting them for derailing threads.
>>4528921>convince people to never, ever, ever buy a sony or a fujifilm cameraSounds like heroic prevention of buyer's remorse and even of dropping the artistic pursuit to me. Seriously, if you want a compact camera look no further than the EOS SL2. It's tiny but doesn't compromise on the things that matter like intrinsic photographic integrity. What you see is the scene, not some cave shadow abomination. It's a miniature window to the joy of reflex. And since last year, it even has official Magic Lantern support.A pint-sized powerhouse, at 122.4 x 92.6 x 69.8 mm. And with 24.2MP and the Canon 1.6x crop ratio, you get impressive reach too. Especially when paired to a 500mm lens like pic related. Despite the size, the ergonomics are top tier (for a Canon) too. It's no Nikon but it's pretty good. And it has a swivel screen. Seriously, what else could you ask for? Capability/size it's the top pick for sure.
>>4528924> Trying to convince who?With how cheap indians and AI are, if they convince one retarded tourist to buy a lumix S9 the profit margin from that one single sale pays for ten years of shilling.Bot threads and bot posters are already obviously on /g/ and /pol/ so why wouldn't they target every consumer board? Shilling is borderline free and if they do it long enough, local NPCs repeat the shills lines for actually free.I can't help but remember the weird posters who were always here to remind us of when canon and nikon refurbs were on sale even though no one from here would seriously buy junk like the nikon z30well, one did, he ended up hating it but that one sale probably paid for another ten years of shilling
>>4528927Why the fuck do you keep doing this? Why do you keep helping to derail threads by responding to the bait?Just fucking stop. This is beyond tiresome - I just want an actual functional board for once. Just stop.
>>4528926>saying there are shills and autistic fanboys here is flame bait actuallyAnd why does it bother you? You're not one of them are you?
>>4528929>nikon z30The sorrow of mirrorless, this time without even an EVF to cope about how you're supposedly not missing out on a DSLR.>>4528932Can't let fujislugs get away with lying to people
>>4528935>There are dishonest shills here and the most common ones really have it out for sony and fuji>Shill: YES I AM FUJI IS BAD NO ONE BUY A FUJI ITS BAD ITS BAD ITS BAD DO NOT BUY A FUJIkek worlds smartest
>>4528937I don't care man, enjoy your worms. The real shills are the ones running cover for Fuji's and Sony's bullshit.
>>4528941>no, i dont want honesty. i want consensus. i don't value truth. i value reputation, vibes, and consensus. i don't care if someone has to lie nonstop if the end result is the consensus i want.very feminine
>>4528948lmao the whole point of Fuji and Sony shills is silencing the truth about the issues their scameras have and manufacturing consensus. I'm sorry Fuji's flagships are poorly built but it's part of the sorrow of mirrorless.
>>4528950>silencing the truthSome retard spamming dpreview test chart screenshots and manufacturing issues from extremely sparse and low quality data is the truth now? The most recent "truth" was saying all sony cameras have a problem because an astrophotographer ran into an issue with an ancient sony that only shot compressed raw. This "truth" ignored that similar issues actually occurred with other brandshttps://www.cloudynights.com/forums/topic/746131-nikon-coloured-concentric-rings/page/1https://www.canonwatch.com/sensor-banding-issue-canon-eos-5d-mark-iv/Which would mean the actual truth is... many older cameras weren't as good as cameras are today, and many had issues in extreme usecases.Why is it that all your "truth" is the same limited evidence, low quality shit reposted exclusively on 4chan no matter how many times it's been smacked down by someone more educated than you?
>>4528954I was talking about the worms and the terrible build quality but thanks for bringing the Sony rings to the table too.
>>4528959>the wormsAn adobe issue that vanishes when using higher quality software>The terrible build qualityA half dozen reddit posts out of millions of cameras soldIt certainly cant be worse than "err 20: the brand" (canon).
>cANON puts his trip on and gets occupied>all the other threads "the shills" were propping up slide off the front pagei'm nooooticing
>>4528914>>4528913>>4528908OP here, the funny thing is I had trouble looking up the image and then just googled "giraffe savannah sunset" and it was the first result. Of course this was before covid and the AI shittery.
Fuji and xtrans have real issues but they're way less significant than any of the shit cANON and "the shills" post about>Xtrans is a tad lower resolution than its bayer equivalent and is getting noisy from the teeny tiny pixelstrue, a 40mp fuji camera can compete with ff if it shoots 20mp jpegs so its basically $2k for aps-c mirrorless to finally surpass the canon 5d mark 3>fuji AF misses sometimesmostly true about their telephotos and the primes with older AF motors, it's a really bad sports photography brand and not every lens is modernized>something something weather sealingtrue about the x100, which is ironic because its meant to be the travel camera, but also not as big of a deal because its easy to keep tucked under a coat. about as common as olympus cameras dying if your metric is forum complaints otherwise.a similar post could be made about sony but i dont feel like itbla bla bla true about the a7iii and much older cameras but not relevant today3 forum posts complaining applies to every branddont use your shutter as a dust cover and it wont break
>>4528962>An adobe issue that vanishes when using higher quality softwarelol, present on the camera's JPEG engine too
>>4528950Plastic virgin vs adamantium chad
Any Fuji/Sony is a toy compared to a humble 6D
>>4528970Yeah camera jpeg engines aren't ideal for pixel peeping grade work. I can literally see individual pixels in this screenshot. That's why capture one exists. If you're shooting jpeg just drop the output size and sharpening settings and it looks fine. This applies to every camera.Remember when you linked the entire blog post this snippet is from and in context, the argument you wanted to make from this snippet fell apart? Of course you do but truth isn't your pursuit, consensus and vibes are. You're a propagandist. Inherently feminine. If you say something wrong and get told off, you're not going to learn something from that, you're going to repeat yourself later. It's amazing how slimy you are. Always changing the terms, finding a red herring, and if you are wholly defeated you forget it ever happened.there was some quote from some book that touched on this behavior. there's some irony to it, given the source, and your beliefs.
>>4528973>everyone's battery froze except for mine>better cameras are worseair gaps are good insulation, who knewbetter luck to everyone next time, keep your battery insulated
Brand wars the way we know them here, are all pretty meaningless considering it's the same Jap cartel selling you the same technology in differently shaped plastic package.What is meaningful is pointing out issues with particular cameras.> OM/Olympus has shit IQ> Snoy has shit colors> Fuji has shit AFAll these things are true and people need to know.
>>4528980Mostly skill issuesEven olympus shit IQ can be remedied by realizing four micro four thirds megapixels equals one full frame megapixel, therefore the om-5 is a 5mp camera. super sharp and noise free.
I need autistic opinions on panny vs. sony. Wanna shoot sigma lenses, which system to buy into? It's going to be my second system so doesn't matter that much desu. I just like that sigma seems to still be a family business and less zogged than all the others.
>>4528855You need to go back
>>4528983>Wanna shoot sigma lenses, which system to buy into?Panasonic obviously, it's on the L-mount alliance.Both are kinda shit but the only reason Sony isn't the worst brand in the market is that Fuji exists
>>4528983Nikon. Not only can it use every sigma lens via ETZ adapters, it can use leica lenses with a compatible sensor covering and focus confirmation with 6 bit MTZ adapters on the expeed7 cameras. And native Z mount lenses, which are actually good, unlike most of L mount.Panasonic is pretty much garbage unless all you care about is video codecs and filming in log. All panasonic does is enable literally every video feature a sony sensor supports and half ass the rest of the camera. L mount is also pretty much garbage except for sigma lenses so there's nothing else worth using. It's really typical for panasonic users to film with EF and PL lenses instead of native L mount glass.Sony is just slightly worse nikon that got to the market earlier so they're always slightly ahead, at a premium.
>>4528987>It's really typical for panasonic users to film with EF and PL lensesThat's really typical of videofags as a whole, not a Panasonic thing but an existing collection of lenses thing.
why are APS-C lens mounts (Sony E [initially intended as such], Fuji X) barely smaller in diameter than full frame? i feel that's a missed opportunity to make them more compact
>>4528929>junk like the nikon z30>>4528935>The sorrow of mirrorless, this time without even an EVF to cope about how you're supposedly not missing out on a DSLR.Sorry, but what's wrong with the Z30? It doesn't have weird image quality defects like its closest competitor. Yeah, it doesn't have an EVF but I can't really use those with my glasses, so why would I pick the Sony over the Nikon?
>>4528990Panasonic is just a video thing.
>>4528994We've been over this. It's just ACR and the shitty settings dpreview uses it with. It doesn't represent what a raw would look like in a real raw processor at all.
>>4528994> Magically, two shots from the same sensor are demosaic'd differently.
>>4528985>>4528987>>4528990I shoot nikon already, z7ii is my main camera. I'm just sceptical of the ETZ adapters actually working. At least in le reddit they are saying it works best with first party sony lenses and support for sigma can be patchy. Not that expensive to try but if I got one and wasn't pleased with the performance then I'm locked into sony. Don't much care for the newer panasonic bodies since they have that fan thing going on. But I used to have S5 at one point and it was decent. Off topic, video shooters really have ruined cameras for photo enjoyers. Enjoy the massive dynamic range of the E500.
>>4528991Because with a smaller sensor you don't have the mount in the way of the light causing vignetting. The baby mount in the Sony cameras combined with the short flange means the rays have to enter the camera body really obliquely. Curving light in the air isn't feasible.
>>4528999Yeah, each raw format is different. If you use competent software like capture one this isn't an issue.>>4529001The newer ones improved sigma compatibility a bit. Autofocus is a bit worse for sigma, especially the older lenses, but it's not like native panasonic performance is going to be better. The worst offenders are still feature laden zooms.>>4529004Dude this argument was already had and your side got fucking wrecked>>4528720>>4528725
>>4529010>your sideit was just him with his trip offall those arguments die as soon as he goes back to playing his cANON character
>>4529010
>>4529013Concession accepted
>>4529011>implying it wasn't you playing both sides to discredit me with unrigorous representations of what the argument is
The moderators are absolutely fucking useless here. This place will never get back under control until we're able to cull the shitposting and schizo spam, but that won't happen if they won't respond to reports.
>>4529023>only gear threads are affected>the problem is cANON starting shit in gear threads and and getting humiliated by a superior autist>photo threads are totally untouchedworking as intended
>>4529024They NEVER stay in the gear threads. Anytime someone starts a new discussion thread, the same people start shitposting immediately and drive away any potential newcomers. It's been a fucking echo chamber for years.
>>4529028>look at every thread where cANON started his autistic sony/fuji hate and got btfo>its a gear threadperfectfuck gear threads
>>4529024>and getting humiliated>>4529029>and got btfoNice headcanon
>>4528950Current Fuji flagships are X-H2 and X-H2s. Both are solidly built. X-T5 is a prosumer model and yes, it's pretty cheap feeling. Mushy buttons and wobbly dials. I bought one and sent it back the next day.
>>4528970Is there anything wrong with the quality of these images?>>4528910The only worm I can see here is you.
>>4529033You can see the worms in the wall above the dog's snout, lol. Well, maybe (You) can't, being blinded by cognitive dissonance.
>>4529035Even on the snout itself you can see wormy textures now that I took a second look. And this is on a downsized image. It looks as if you overlaid a worm texture above the fur. Hilarious shit.Shooting Fuji is like taking your negatives to an incompetent lab that causes reticulation due to poor handling of temperatures.
>>4529035That's a jpg with added grain. This is how the unprocessed RAW looks like. I don't really see a problem with this considering that I shot this handheld at 1/125s with ISO 4000 on APS-C sensor. I think it looks pretty good.>>4529036So a 300% crop of a screenshot of a jpg. I think you're just mentally ill.
>4529036>zooms in on countable pixels of dog fur with fake film grain>ITS WORMSThe way cANON routinely humiliates himself here is the best advertising sony and fuji have ever gotten on 4chan
>>4529010>Yeah, each raw format is different. If you use competent software like capture one this isn't an issue.So are you saying Sony's firmware isn't competent?
>>4529039Post orher cameras of same resolution for comparisons. With similar shap lenses
>>4529039Bro…>dpreview test shooter uses camera wrong>4chan nophoto blames the cameraif you want to blur the image to eliminate aliasing you can use a worse lens, stop down, raise the ISO, or use a mist filter. you dont need an OLPF so even your best lenses sharpest aperture is blurry. you’d know if you took photos instead of browsing dpreviewSony users = famous prosSony haters = dpreview trolls
>>4529039https://archive.palanq.win/p/search/image/XZ0CFqP4AAis98kM0bUcUw/Same MD5Same filenameSame argument
>>4529037I think it looks pretty good... for a Fuji lol.It's well known that not every picture is equally affected by the issue. However I'm doubting your "added grain" is so wormy, I think you smeared the picture further in this version to make them go away. In any case, the dark part above the snout still looks wormy. Just admit you don't care about how a camera performs but what it looks like, because you wanted a fashion accessory.
>>4529041>>4529042Do you think people havent corrected this disinfo bot before?https://archive.palanq.win/p/search/image/XZ0CFqP4AAis98kM0bUcUw/Same MD5Same filenameSame argumentCheck each thread, every time it has been proven wrongIt keeps reposting like it never happened
>>4529043Is he supposed to look up a new picture each time the argument comes up?
>>4529044Thank god you have a trip. What a sad little person you are.
>>4529046>Keeps getting proven wrong>Keeps trying again>>4528976BroMoire spammer is cANON
>>4529045Thanks for Correcting the Record™, anon.>>4529048Whatever helps you sleep at night.
/p/ - one tripfag humiliating himself and everything he believes in while everyone else Posts Photos(tm)If mods cared it would be a matter of banning one name, one trip, and a half dozen MD5 hashes but its obviously too funny to stop
>I bought a 40MP camera but if I resize to 1.83MP the image looks alright... kindaThis is the point fujislugs are currently at, kek. They spend hours massaging the raws to drive the worms out and still fail so they have to cope with what amounts to a thumbnail. All because they wanted to have a Leica but couldn't afford it so they settled for an ungenuine japanese simulacrum.
>>4529041
>>4529052Worms are a hefty price to pay to eliminate moire, I'd rather live with it. Honestly the best way to make someone pick a Sony is giving them Fuji as the only alternative, literally the worst brand on the ILC market.
>>4528856>containment threadsthis only works if janitors actually contain the problem to those threads
>>4529052I wonder how these compare after moire removal on Sony. Those algorithms do soften the picture a little bit.
>>4529052This is just bad processing. The problem is totally and completely fixed using competent RAW software. Stop pixel peeping.
>>4529059>s-stop noticing!
>>4529051Fuji makes you so angry it's funny
>>4529059>The problem is totally and completely fixed using competent RAW softwareYou mean software that runs moire removal algorithms automatically? Should Fuji RAWs be processed in Capture One then or is it only ok if software benefits your proffered brand?
>>4529064>preferred
>>4529063The bad faith argumentation rooted in lies is what frustrates me. Fucking cultists.
>>4529059I'd argue your processed image still looks worse than Fuji. Fuji is softer but looks natural. Yours is still showing false colors.
>>4529066You should do some introspection about being bad faith, you might actually feel better
Hi anons. I am poor but wanted a telephoto, so I purchased a "vintage" Meyer Optik Telemegor 400mm f/5.5 for $100 and put it on a M43 camera. Let's have a look at bokeh and sharpness.
>>4529064Multi-pass demosaicing that's less prone to aliasing is cheating now?These issues disappear entirely in capture one. At a clear cost. Even on a decently modern PC with dedicated graphics and hardware acceleration, it takes a second or two to generate previews each low resolution raw and way way longer for high resolution and xtrans files.Sony and Fuji partnered with capture one a long time ago (with free limited licenses) and funneled tens of thousands of potential customers away from adobe. Long term, adobe has worse support for these two brands than capture one does. Use the correct software suite for your camera.Sony, Fuji, Phaseone/leaf/mamiya -> Capture oneCanon, Nikon, Panasonic -> Adobe (Nikon is officially directly partnered with adobe. Nikon camera matching profiles look better in adobe than C1. surprise.)Hasselblad -> Phocus
>>4529071Wide open f/5.5, 1/125s, auto iso 640. Lots of softness and "ring" bokeh.
>>4529071Stopping down, f/11, 1/125, auto iso 2000.
>>4529071f/22, 1/60, auto iso 3200. This is the best look IMO.
>>4529071Closed all the way down now, 400mm f/32 (800mm f/64(!!!) on full frame), 1/30, auto iso 3200.All the shots were on a tripod with self-timer but my shutter speed was limited by the wind moving the leaves. I didn't want motion blur to affect results.
>>4528856>em dashClanker
>>4529073>>45290784 mft pixel = 1 ff pixel therefore this lens is sharp ackshually
>>4528802fuck captchas
I'm seeing this shilled basically everywhere.Should it be my first full frame digital camera? I have a couple of AI lenses already for my film SLR that could be adapted.
>>4529117its major overkill. like if the sony a7iii were actually a good camera instead of a steaming pile of dog shit. the z6ii is fine for a clueless retard the autofocus is just a bit shitty for sportslike stuff
Did I make a mistake getting an f/4 14-150 zoom? I already have an f/1.4 20mm prime
>>4529052This ia useless. I don t take photos of teat charts give me the same picture of the walls and buildings, at the same zoom and crop so i can see irl differences.I need to see compared to other cameras how noticeable that is. Is it 1%, 10%, over 9000%.Fyi i have the 6700. I.m not gonna replace it, i m not gonna sell it i m not gonna shoot it wit .50 AP i m not gonna blender it. This is what i have this is what i m going to use.I just want to see if all this sperging is genuine or you are just retarded so post sone fucking irl pics of the same subject with more or less same lighting conditions so i can see the superiority of other brands sensors
>>4529145Bruh not many people own both Sony and Fuji cameras with comparable MP count and similar lenses because why would they? Pretty much none of these who do are interested in pixel peeping comparisons on 4chan. This DPReview chart is the best you're gonna get. If you're happy with your 6700 then just ignore these threads. Comparison is the killer of joy.Gear has some importance but I assure you that moire at 100% crop is not something that's gonna hold back your photography.
>>4529130superzooms are always a meme
>>4529119>Z5 is overkill>get Z6Huh?
>>4529150I m just curious how the my camera compares to others in the market and if any other brands have better eqp. Not because i have buyer remorse. I m quite happy with the camera. There would be some stuf i would like the cameras to have like joystick or some search option to go fast trough settings. but joystick is available on ff more expensive and bigger cameras that i did not want to buy. For my first camera i don t know if there was something better in that price range new. A6700 was the latest model. All other brands latest models were more expensive and cannon was not an option for their lens limitations.Was my decision right or wrong i don t care as i can t change anything and i m also not using the camera as much as it should and at it s maximum capability to want more. Yes better night and low light capability would be better but is sensor limitation so if i want i would get a ff. Atm i just want more lensesFast Ultra wides, fish eye, some super zoom for moon and wide life. Maybe a tilt shift just to see what is all about. Some big magnification macro like 10x. i just want to explore all sort of picture taking but is expensive like crazy.
>>4529117It could be worse, it could be a snoy. Go for it.
>>4529160Nikon LLM strikes again.
>>4529163You should ignore all moire discussion in here, it's all trolling at this point.Pic is moire on Fuji btw.
>>4529145Defects that show up in test charts show up in real images, just more subtle. The purpose of a test chart is to make it repeatable and comparable.DPReview's studio comparison scene also has all kinds of real life objects and textures to compare different cameras.this is the source for pic related and the previous crop.https://img.photographyblog.com/reviews/sony_a6700/sample_images/sony_a6700_45.jpg
I want to get a GR to have it in my pocket everywhere I go. I don't know if I prefer 28 or 40mm equivalent since 35 would be my usual go to edc; these two both have their merits and downsides for me. Leaning towards 28 because landscape and there is always cropWhich one would you get and why?
>>4529169If the only thing is that colour fringing i can live with that. I did not notice it until now but i don t shoot clothing or architecture that much. But isn t that mostly attributed to lens. How you firenwciate between lens coma and sensor one?
>>4529080That was another trap, like the one I set yesterday >>4528830. I'm really digging this desperation of yours.
>>4529174>i don t shoot clothing or architecture that muchThe false colour effects are also visible on natural scenes, especially in situation like pic related where small points of light filter through leaves/branches.https://www.dpreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/5863043706-L1001173.ACR-adjusted.jpeg?original>How you firenwciate between lens coma and sensor one?lens issues generally don't have striping or small scale colour variation, and they will get worse towards the periphery while sensor issues are stronger in the center where the lens is sharpest.
>>4529169This is an AI spambot. https://archive.palanq.win/p/search/image/5FoMtqg6oLHLtq9DH3AErQ/>>4529174Its caused by using too sharp a lens/aperture for photographing grids or low quality raw converter. Moire is a skill issue. You can make a lens less sharp by using a smaller/much wider aperture or a softening filter. F5.6 and F8 tend to be the sharpest. Capture one interprets raw data better so moire is less common to begin with. This usually happens on high quality cameras like sony and nikon because every photo on a low quality camera is slightly blurry no matter what and slightly blurry photos don’t get as much moire. But, then every photo is blurry and you’d be like that fuji anon who paid for 40 megapixels to shrink it down to 18 megapixels to hide the blur.
>>4529175To add, I've also never seen a bot on 4chan check anyone's digits. Some of you guys are so hopelessly neurotic that you'll start sweating at every potential sign -- even ones that were left for you specifically.
>>4529176This is an AI spambot. https://archive.palanq.win/p/search/image/934yQKgMhP_eEtrQOBIS_A/
>>4529178Wow. Why do mods let a bot like that run? It would be so easy to ban it. It doesnt change its image or even the filename.
>>4529178> Its caused by using too sharp a lens/aperture for photographing grids or low quality raw converter. Moire is a skill issue. You can make a lens less sharp by using a smaller/much wider aperture or a softening filter. F5.6 and F8 tend to be the sharpest. Capture one interprets raw data better so moire is less common to begin with.So dpreview photographers are low skill sharpness freaks and use shitty softwareWhy does anyone use that shit site
>>4529169Hey Alexa, recommend me some shows on prime video I might like.>>4529160A used Z6II is cheaper than the Z5II, besides having the LCD display on top and better build quality. But both are overrated. I'd rather use a 20 year old DSLR.
>>4529182Mods? Here? On /p/? Buddy, they'll ban people for talking mad shit about SNOY or that one insufferable jeet spamming the /gear/ threads and that's about all you're gonna get.
