I like editing the photos I take in Photoshop, anyone else take photos like this?1/5
Advice appreciated too2/5
3/5
4/5
I have more if you want to see5/5
I think it's a great idea and looks like a legitimate art project. Great thread. I think the execution could be improved though, so it's more impactful. >>4534857What I like about this one is the edge that continues infinitely. I followed it without realizing the image was manipulated, and it made me realize what was happening. Gave me quite an uncanny feeling. I think for both this one and >>4534858 the effect could be improved if the city below was much much larger, it would give a better sense of being lost in it. >>4534859I like that this one is a bit more clear in what you attempt, but also it might become cliché glitch city pretty quick.>>4534861This one is weird. I can't really pinpoint what you did. If it was posted in rpt I wouldn't have looked twice but I guess it makes sense here.>>4534863What's interesting in this one is that at first glance it really looks like a shitty urbex photo, but then you see what's going on. But there is no immersion like in the other one where the city is quite ominous, here it's more like a weird bridge. Maybe it would work better if the bridge lookes even more complex and gigantic.anyway, thanks for the thread
Mind sharing the original picture and explain what exactly are you doing?
>there is no photo threads on /p because critic is too harsh
>>4535294nobody here understands you can be critical without being a cockjockey about things.
>>4535295Nobody is being harsh here. And when people are harsh it's usually very justified. The reason why photo thread die is because 80% of OP never answer or engage with criticism, and posters learn it's a waste of time to write a whole ass paragraph when you won't even know whether OP read it.
>>4535298Trip on, poppet
>>4535295>>4535304>got called out for snapshitsCope and seethe
