[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: shakey.gif (3.89 MB, 498x338)
3.89 MB GIF
I'm quite surprised that we haven't really seen Ai being used in panorama stitching software.

I would have thought that, by now, we would be seeing neural feature matching, depth aware alignment, generative seam reconstruction, etc. Ai being used to identify surfaces and textures and blend them properly. To spot perspective and angle changes and account for them in the stitching.

Yet here we are, with photoshop and PTGui, still using stitching methods from 2007. I guess theres just no money in stitching. Except maybe for adobe, who are on their asses right now and charging people extra just to generate small image fixes.
>>
>>4537477
gpt does it flawlessly so why bother making an app for it
>>
>>4537489
ChatGPT is terrible for image stitching. As much as it will tell you it's going to leave your original images looking the same, it never does. Plus it's not exactly going to give you Tiff or DNG files at full resolution.
>>
>>4537477
I always use the HDR merge and panorama stitching built in to capture one

Even before they added more advanced AI features, it worked perfectly and the end result DNG just looks like a photo taken with a better sensor or a larger FOV unless you fuck up by using photos with motion blur or extreme misalignment. C1 has just always been basically flawless software.
>>
>>4537495
>ChatGPT is terrible
poorfag detected, of course it is when the likes of you just use the free website version
>>
File: 0440.jpg (924 KB, 1800x1800)
924 KB JPG
>>4537477
I used Hugin before Google devoured Panoramio years ago. It was bit clunky but did the job for me. Dunno how outdated it is these days.
>>
>>4537766
I have more paid for editing software than you will ever own, chile. I even have paid ChatGPT.
>>
>>4537477
>Yet here we are, with photoshop and PTGui, still using stitching methods from 2007.
remember microsoft ICE? that shit was amazing, like 15Mb installer, SUPER lightweight and with a simple interface that gives way better results than ptg or hugin or any of those fuckarounds, and then they killed it and you can only find the installer on shady filehippo style repositories
>>
File: fdfgd.jpg (54 KB, 233x402)
54 KB JPG
>>4537885
remember it? shit, its still on my desktop



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.