[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/p/ - Photography

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


>crushed blacks! lost detail in the shadows!
>part of the sky is blown out!
>why are the subjects in the CENTER?
>needs some serious cropping dude
>>
Total slop. If you took my advice and used a do-everything zoom, you would actually be able to see the detail on the people and the cottage

This is why you leave the primes to the pros people!
>>
>>4537517
>overexposed
>needs more space for the man walking on the path
>>
>>4537520
>>4537517
Weird green tint and wrong white balance, and you're clearly not setting your tone curves in camera because you dont have the skill to shoot jpeg or these would be more realistic and honest. Typical raw editor guesswork.
>>
>>4537517
>no information in her CRUSHED BLACK hair and clothing
>>
>>4537522
lemme guess... canon rp. no dynamic range. and you mirrorless shills say it doesn't matter.
>>
File: 1719378313520594.jpg (3.63 MB, 4500x2888)
3.63 MB JPG
>>4537517
>scene is just too high contrast, too much clipping in the blacks, take at a different time of the day bro
>>
File: Night at Gurzuf.jpg (960 KB, 3000x2247)
960 KB JPG
>>4537517
>some bad GLARE reflected by the water
>busy composition, what are OUR EYES SUPPOSED TO BE DIRECTED TO?
>needs some cropping, lots of unnecessary space!
>>
>>4537525
Should have used a CPL and a long exposure (micro four thirds has better IBIS, fool framer. yeah, i see your HDR)

sharp water just shows you dont know how to use a camera
>>
>the snow is TOO BRIGHT, it is DRAGGING MY EYES DOWN and DOMINATING THE COMPOSITION
>CLIPPING in the dark parts of the tree trunks! can you even METER correctly?
>>
>OP's posts: mad because overexposure
>other posts: actually funny
>>
>>4537521
>Weird green tint
Shouldn't have used a Sony.
>>
>>4537517
>the image here is just TOO BUSY. there are TOO MANY SUBJECTS - what am I SUPPOSED TO BE LOOKING AT?
>needs some SEVERE CROPPING
>>
>>4537517
>not enough DETAIL in the SHADOWS
>why so much space at the top? CROP it out
>>
>>4537534
Ok, now it sounds like your screen is broken

This image has a lot of detail in the shadows
>>
>>4537535
>but there's just NOT ENOUGH shadow detail, there COULD BE MORE. some parts of the image have NO TEXTURE. PURE BLACK IS EVIL.
>>
>>4537524
Literally just a snapshot. Learn to compose.
>>
>>4537536
You're just seething about this specifically over and over again. It's getting cringe.

I've never even seen it outside of ken rockwell's blog and that weird jpeg panasonic shill's posts
>>
>>4537538
>YOU JUST DON'T GET IT. CLIPPED BLACKS AND WHITES ARE SIGNS OF THE AMATEUR, THEY JUST RUIN THE IMAGE. LEARN TO HDR IN LIGHTROOM AND GET BACK TO ME CHAMP.
>>
>>4537538
Kek you come across as a bigger whiner than him

You had to post this twice because no one cared the first time
>>
>>4537517
There are neither crushed blacks or clipped whites in that, and the composition is great.
>>
Autists predictably not picking up on sarcasm: the thread
>>
>>4537522
The person who photographed the painting fucked up.
>>
This thread is great lmao
>missed focus
>>
>>4537519
>>4537521
>>4537523
>>4537526
>>4537531
Kek
>>
>>4537546
uh huh
>>
>>4537562
Calibrate your screen
>>
>>4537563
Even at its brightest, I can't imagine black away like you
I'm not racist enough ig
>>
>>4537562
Look at that noise pattern in the shadows. THIS IS WHY YOU DONT USE A CANON RP. Buy a nikon d5300! NOT A D7500. Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
>>
>>4537517
that some really crappy iso performance and bokeh.
>>
>>4537575
do people really buy four digit nikons?
>>
>>4537575
Nice caricature of what I actually say, faggot.
Stay mad.
>>4537605
People buying 4 digit Canons is the real mystery.
>>
>>4537538
Hello Karen



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.